Families and Schools for Health
FiSH
Intervening in Family and Peer Contexts to Decrease Child Overweight
2 other identifiers
interventional
541
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to test the effectiveness of a child obesity intervention with multiple components targeting nutrition and/or psycho-social factors in children, their parents, and their classmates. The specific aims of the study are to (1) Determine the effectiveness of two family-level interventions for improving child outcomes (unhealthy eating, low activity, and overweight); (2) Determine the extent to which adding a family dynamics component enhances the effectiveness of a family lifestyle intervention and improves the child outcomes listed above; and (3) Determine the extent to which a peer-level intervention improves the effectiveness of two family-level interventions among overweight children.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2005
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 7, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 20, 2016
CompletedJanuary 20, 2016
January 1, 2016
5.1 years
January 7, 2016
January 14, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Body Mass Change from Baseline to End of 1st grade
Height and weight measured at Wave 2 (Spring 1st grade), vs. Baseline at Fall 1st grade
Wave 2, Spring Year 1
Body Mass Change from Baseline to End of 2nd grade
Height and weight measured at Wave 3 (Spring 2nd grade), vs. Baseline at Wave 1, Fall 1st grade
Wave 3, Spring Year 2
Body Mass Change from Baseline to End of 3rd grade
Height and weight measured at Wave 4 (Spring 3rd grade), vs. Baseline at Wave 1, Fall 1st grade
Wave 4, Spring Year 3
Body Mass Change from Baseline to End of 4th grade
Height and weight measured at Wave 5 (Spring 4th grade) vs. Baseline at Wave 1, Fall 1st grade
Wave 5, Spring Year 4
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Parent perceived responsibility, weight, child weight, concerns about weight, feeding practices - parent report
Wave 1 Fall year 1, Wave 2 Spring year 1, Wave 3 Spring year 2, Wave 4 Spring year 3, Wave 5 Spring year 4
Parent expectations about, parent modeling of, and parent perception of child beliefs regarding eating - parent report
Wave 1 Fall year 1, Wave 2 Spring year 1, Wave 3 Spring year 2, Wave 4 Spring year 3, Wave 5 Spring year 4
Family problem solving, communication, affective responsiveness, affective involvement, & general family functioning - parent report
Wave 1 Fall year 1, Wave 2 Spring year 1, Wave 3 Spring year 2, Wave 4 Spring year 3, Wave 5 Spring year 4
Parenting style (permissive, authoritative, authoritarian) - parent report
Wave 1 Fall year 1, Wave 2 Spring year 1, Wave 3 Spring year 2, Wave 4 Spring year 3, Wave 5 Spring year 4
Parent response to child negative emotions - parent report
Wave 1 Fall year 1, Wave 2 Spring year 1, Wave 3 Spring year 2, Wave 4 Spring year 3, Wave 5 Spring year 4
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (5)
Family Lifestyle (FL; n = 117)
EXPERIMENTALThis arm includes the Family Food \& Lifestyle intervention (FL). Parents and children meet for 12 weekly, 90-minute psychoeducational groups in children's schools. They meet separately for 45 minutes and then conjointly for 45 minutes.
FL + Family Dynamics (FL+FD; n = 88)
EXPERIMENTALThis arm includes the Family Food \& Lifestyle + Family Dynamics interventions (FL+FD). Parents and children meet separately for the full 90-minute psychoeducation sessions. The first 45 minutes are devoted to the Family Food \& Lifestyle intervention and the second 45 minutes to the Family Dynamics intervention.
FL + Peer Group (FL+PG; n = 124)
EXPERIMENTALThis arm includes the Family Food \& Lifestyle intervention plus the 12-session, Peer Group intervention.
FL + FD + Peer Group (FL+FD+PG; n = 130)
EXPERIMENTALThis arm includes the Family Food \& Lifestyle intervention plus the Family Dynamics Intervention plus the Peer Group intervention.
Control (n = 82)
NO INTERVENTIONNon-intervention control group
Interventions
12-week Family Food \& Lifestyle intervention, aimed at improving family nutritional intake, activity levels, weight perception, and parental monitoring of child eating. Material is delivered in psychoeducational groups in the children's schools.
The Family Dynamics intervention focuses on positive parenting (i.e., emotion coaching, praise, limit setting) and on child emotion regulation and positive problem solving. Material is delivered in psychoeducational groups in the children's schools.
Peer Group intervention conducted throughout one semester of the school year that includes 12 sessions of a guidance-type curriculum during class time sensitizing children to the importance of social inclusion of all children
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children with BMI% greater than or equal to 75% who were enrolled in first grade in participating schools.
You may not qualify if:
- Children with BMI% \< 75%.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Amanda Harristlead
Related Publications (9)
Harrist AW, Swindle TM, Hubbs-Tait L, Topham GL, Shriver LH, Page MC. The Social and Emotional Lives of Overweight, Obese, and Severely Obese Children. Child Dev. 2016 Sep;87(5):1564-80. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12548. Epub 2016 May 25.
PMID: 27223340BACKGROUNDShriver LH, Hubbs-Tait L, Harrist AW, Topham G, Page M. Child gender and weight status moderate the relation of maternal feeding practices to body esteem in 1st grade children. Appetite. 2015 Jun;89:62-9. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.01.017. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
PMID: 25624022BACKGROUNDHarrist AW, Hubbs-Tait L, Topham GL, Shriver LH, Page MC. Emotion regulation is related to children's emotional and external eating. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2013 Oct;34(8):557-65. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e3182a5095f.
PMID: 24131878BACKGROUNDShriver LH, Harrist AW, Page M, Hubbs-Tait L, Moulton M, Topham G. Differences in body esteem by weight status, gender, and physical activity among young elementary school-aged children. Body Image. 2013 Jan;10(1):78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2012.10.005. Epub 2012 Nov 24.
PMID: 23228485BACKGROUNDHarrist, A. W., Topham, G. L., Hubbs-Tait, L., Page, M. C., Kennedy, T. S., & Shriver, L. H. (2012). What developmental science can contribute to a multidisciplinary understanding of childhood obesity. Child Development Perspectives, 6, 445-465. doi:10.1111/cdep.12004
BACKGROUNDShriver LH, Harrist AW, Hubbs-Tait L, Topham G, Page M, Barrett A. Weight status, physical activity, and fitness among third-grade rural children. J Sch Health. 2011 Sep;81(9):536-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00624.x.
PMID: 21831066BACKGROUNDTopham GL, Hubbs-Tait L, Rutledge JM, Page MC, Kennedy TS, Shriver LH, Harrist AW. Parenting styles, parental response to child emotion, and family emotional responsiveness are related to child emotional eating. Appetite. 2011 Apr;56(2):261-4. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.01.007. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
PMID: 21232566BACKGROUNDTopham GL, Page MC, Hubbs-Tait L, Rutledge JM, Kennedy TS, Shriver L, Harrist AW. Maternal depression and socio-economic status moderate the parenting style/child obesity association. Public Health Nutr. 2010 Aug;13(8):1237-44. doi: 10.1017/S1368980009992163. Epub 2009 Dec 8.
PMID: 19968899BACKGROUNDHubbs-Tait L, Kennedy TS, Page MC, Topham GL, Harrist AW. Parental feeding practices predict authoritative, authoritarian, and permissive parenting styles. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008 Jul;108(7):1154-61; discussion 1161-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.04.008.
PMID: 18589022BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Amanda W Harrist, PhD
Oklahoma State University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 7, 2016
First Posted
January 20, 2016
Study Start
May 1, 2005
Primary Completion
June 1, 2010
Study Completion
June 1, 2010
Last Updated
January 20, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share