A Device for Screening of Fall Risk in the Elderly
Evaluation of Screening Accuracy of a Device for Fall Risk Assessment in the Elderly: a Cross-sectional Study With a Futility Design
1 other identifier
interventional
184
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the screening accuracy of a device (OAK) in assessing fall risk in the elderly, compared to the assessment provided by the Algorithm for Fall Risk Assessment of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The OAK device is a technologic system, based on virtual reality. It allows to quickly perform a fall risk assessment integrating clinical indexes of the Brief-BESTest (The Balance Evaluation System Test), and kinematic and posturgraphic indexes. The participants interact with the OAK device through simple exercises, then the device provides an assessment of their functional mobility, equilibrium and postural reactions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Nov 2015
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 12, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 14, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2017
CompletedJune 29, 2017
February 1, 2017
1.1 years
January 12, 2016
June 28, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
OAK failures in the fall risk assessment
Proportion of participants for which the OAK device is not able to provide a fall risk assessment
Baseline
OAK sensitivity in the fall risk assessment
Proportion of participants assessed by the OAK device as moderate/high risk of falling among those at moderate/high risk according to the CDC Algorithm for Fall Risk Assessment
Baseline
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Adverse events
Baseline
Serious adverse events
Baseline
Rate of falls
During the previous 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Moderate/High Risk
EXPERIMENTALParticipants assessed as moderate/high risk of falling according to the CDC Algorithm for Fall Risk Assessment
Low Risk
EXPERIMENTALParticipants assessed as low risk of falling according to the CDC Algorithm for Fall Risk Assessment
Interventions
The OAK device evaluates the fall risk through exercises assessing mobility, equilibrium and postural reaction.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Able to walk without walking aids.
- Signed informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Neurological, musculoskeletal and orthopaedic disorders limiting mobility function and equilibrium. Psychiatric disorders. Any other medical condition limiting mobility function, as diabetes, obesity, serious ocular disorders (e.g. glaucoma), vestibular disorders (e.g. labyrinthitis) and proprioceptive disorders (e.g. ataxia).
- Pacemaker.
- Surgical interventions for orthopaedic disorders (e.g. knee or hip prosthesis) during the previous 6 months.
- Drug intake altering coordination and equilibrium (e.g. anti-epileptic, sedative-hypnotic drugs).
- Pregnancy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedic Hospital
Milan, 20161, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Castellini G, Gianola S, Stucovitz E, Tramacere I, Banfi G, Moja L. Diagnostic test accuracy of an automated device as a screening tool for fall risk assessment in community-residing elderly: A STARD compliant study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Sep;98(39):e17105. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017105.
PMID: 31574809DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Giuseppe Banfi, MD
banfi.giuseppe@fondazionesanraffaele.it
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 12, 2016
First Posted
January 14, 2016
Study Start
November 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
May 1, 2017
Last Updated
June 29, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02