NCT02654327

Brief Summary

This is a trial of a new way of treating patients with respiratory failure. The investigators propose to deliver a multi-centre clinical trial to determine whether veno-venous extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (VV-ECCO2R) and lower tidal volume mechanical ventilation improves outcomes and is cost-effective, in comparison with standard care in patients who are mechanically ventilated for acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
1,120

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2016

Longer than P75 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 10, 2016

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 13, 2016

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 12, 2016

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 12, 2020

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

March 2, 2022

Status Verified

March 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

3.8 years

First QC Date

January 10, 2016

Last Update Submit

March 1, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

ExtracorporealAcute Respiratory Distress SyndromeProtective Lung VentilationVentilator Induced Lung InjuryCarbon Dioxide RemovalLungLung Injury

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • All cause mortality

    90 days after randomisation

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • Tidal volume (ml/kg Predicted Body Weight)

    day 2 and day 3 after randomisation

  • Ventilator free days

    28 days after randomisation

  • Duration of ventilation in survivors

    28 days after randomisation

  • Need for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)

    7 days after randomisation

  • Mortality rate

    28 days, 6 months and 1 year after randomisation

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Right Ventricular function

    Baseline & Day 2/Day 3

Study Arms (2)

Standard Care

NO INTERVENTION

Standard care with conventional lung protective mechanical ventilation

ECCO2R to enable lower tidal volume mechanical ventilation

EXPERIMENTAL

VV-ECCO2R to enable lower tidal volume mechanical ventilation (target tidal volume of ≤ 3ml/kg predicted body weight and a Pplat ≤ 25cmH20)

Device: VV-ECCO2R to enable lower tidal volume mechanical ventilation

Interventions

In the intervention arm a dual lumen catheter will be inserted into a central vein. VV-ECCO2R is commenced and managed as per study manual. Tidal volumes are then reduced on mechanical ventilation to enable lower tidal volume ventilation. Lower tidal volume facilitated by VV-ECCO2R will continue for a least 2 days up to a maximum of 7 days

ECCO2R to enable lower tidal volume mechanical ventilation

Eligibility Criteria

Age16 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Invasive mechanical ventilation using positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) ≥ 5cmH2O
  • Acute and potentially reversible cause of acute respiratory failure as determined by the treating physician
  • Within 48 hours of the onset of hypoxemia as defined by Pa02/Fi02 less than or equal to 20kPA

You may not qualify if:

  • Age \< 16 years old
  • Intubated and mechanically ventilated via an endotracheal or tracheostomy tube ≥ 7 days (168 hours) up to the time of randomisation
  • Ability to maintain Vt to ≤ 3ml/kg PBW while maintaining pH ≥ 7.2 as determined by the treating physician
  • Receiving, or decision to commence, ECMO in the next 24 hours
  • Mechanical ventilation using high frequency oscillation ventilation or airway pressure release ventilation
  • Untreated pulmonary embolism, pleural effusion or pneumothorax as the primary cause of acute respiratory failure
  • Acute respiratory failure fully explained by left ventricular failure or fluid overload (May be determined by clinical assessment or echocardiography/cardiac output monitoring)
  • Left ventricular failure requiring mechanical support
  • Contra-indication to limited systemic anticoagulation with heparin
  • Unable to obtain vascular access to a central vein (internal jugular or femoral vein)
  • Consent declined
  • Treatment withdrawal imminent within 24 hours
  • Patients not expected to survive 90 days on basis of premorbid health status
  • DNAR (Do Not Attempt Resuscitation) order (excluding advance directives) in place
  • Severe chronic respiratory disease requiring domiciliary ventilation (except for sleep disordered breathing)
  • +4 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Belfast Health and Social Care Trust

Belfast, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1301-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801.

    PMID: 10793162BACKGROUND
  • Fitzgerald M, Millar J, Blackwood B, Davies A, Brett SJ, McAuley DF, McNamee JJ. Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal for patients with acute respiratory failure secondary to the acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2014 May 15;18(3):222. doi: 10.1186/cc13875.

    PMID: 25033302BACKGROUND
  • Terragni PP, Del Sorbo L, Mascia L, Urbino R, Martin EL, Birocco A, Faggiano C, Quintel M, Gattinoni L, Ranieri VM. Tidal volume lower than 6 ml/kg enhances lung protection: role of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal. Anesthesiology. 2009 Oct;111(4):826-35. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181b764d2.

    PMID: 19741487BACKGROUND
  • Bein T, Weber-Carstens S, Goldmann A, Muller T, Staudinger T, Brederlau J, Muellenbach R, Dembinski R, Graf BM, Wewalka M, Philipp A, Wernecke KD, Lubnow M, Slutsky AS. Lower tidal volume strategy ( approximately 3 ml/kg) combined with extracorporeal CO2 removal versus 'conventional' protective ventilation (6 ml/kg) in severe ARDS: the prospective randomized Xtravent-study. Intensive Care Med. 2013 May;39(5):847-56. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2787-6. Epub 2013 Jan 10.

    PMID: 23306584BACKGROUND
  • Boyle AJ, Reddy K, Conlon J, Auzinger G, Bannard-Smith J, Barrett NA, Camporota L, Gillies MA, Jackson C, McDowell C, Patel B, Perkins GD, Szakmany T, Tunnicliffe W, Welters ID, McNamee JJ, McAuley DF, O'Kane CM. Evaluation of Plasma Biomarkers to Understand the Biology and Heterogeneity of Treatment Effect in Lower Tidal Volume Ventilation Facilitated by Extracorporeal CO2 Removal in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: A Secondary Analysis of the REST Trial. Crit Care Explor. 2025 Mar 27;7(4):e1246. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001246. eCollection 2025 Apr 1.

  • Agus A, McNamee JJ, Jackson C, McAuley DF. Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal compared to ventilation alone in patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: cost-utility analysis of the REST RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2023 Aug;29(33):1-34. doi: 10.3310/FCDQ8036.

  • Boyle AJ, McDowell C, Agus A, Logan D, Stewart JD, Jackson C, Mills J, McNamee JJ, McAuley DF. Acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure after treatment with lower tidal volume ventilation facilitated by extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal: long-term outcomes from the REST randomised trial. Thorax. 2023 Aug;78(8):767-774. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2022-218874. Epub 2022 Oct 5.

  • McNamee JJ, Gillies MA, Barrett NA, Perkins GD, Tunnicliffe W, Young D, Bentley A, Harrison DA, Brodie D, Boyle AJ, Millar JE, Szakmany T, Bannard-Smith J, Tully RP, Agus A, McDowell C, Jackson C, McAuley DF; REST Investigators. Effect of Lower Tidal Volume Ventilation Facilitated by Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal vs Standard Care Ventilation on 90-Day Mortality in Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: The REST Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Sep 21;326(11):1013-1023. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.13374.

  • Stokes JW, Gannon WD, Rice TW. Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal or Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Why Should We Care? Crit Care Med. 2021 May 1;49(5):e546-e547. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004844. No abstract available.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Distress SyndromeVentilator-Induced Lung InjuryLung Injury

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesRespiration DisordersThoracic InjuriesWounds and Injuries

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Intensive Care Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2016

First Posted

January 13, 2016

Study Start

May 12, 2016

Primary Completion

March 12, 2020

Study Completion

April 30, 2022

Last Updated

March 2, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Locations