USDA Healthy Incentives Pilot
HIP
1 other identifier
interventional
55,095
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The USDA Healthy Incentives Pilot (HIP) evaluated the impact of a 30% financial incentive on fruit and vegetable intake among adult participants in the USDA Supplemental Nutrition and Assistance Program (SNAP).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2010
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 4, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 8, 2016
CompletedJanuary 8, 2016
January 1, 2016
2.4 years
January 4, 2016
January 6, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Targeted fruit and vegetable (TFV) intake
Daily adult intake of fresh, canned, frozen, and dried fruits and vegetables without added sugars, fats, oils, or salt, excluding white potatoes, mature legumes (dried beans and peas), and 100% juice. In total and by USDA food pattern group (all targeted fruits; citrus, melon, and berries; other fruits; all targeted vegetables; dark green vegetables; red \& orange vegetables (including tomatoes and other red \& orange vegetables); starchy vegetables (excluding white potatoes); and other vegetables.) Assessed via computer-assisted telephone interview 24-hour dietary recall (Automated Multiple Pass Method). Measured in cup-equivalents based on USDA Food Pattern Equivalents Database (FPED). Secondary analyses assessed changes between follow-up rounds.
Intake in prior 24 hours; assessed in two follow-up rounds (4-6 mo and 9-11 mo post-implementation) with 10% replicate subsample in each round; data pooled across two follow-up rounds and replicate samples for primary analysis
Secondary Outcomes (3)
All fruit and vegetable intake
Intake in prior 24 hours; assessed in two follow-up rounds (4-6 mo and 9-11 mo post-implementation) with 10% replicate subsample in each round; data pooled across two follow-up rounds and replicate samples for main analysis
Intake of other foods
Intake in prior 24 hours; assessed in two follow-up rounds (4-6 mo and 9-11 mo post-implementation) with 10% replicate subsample in each round; data pooled across two follow-up rounds and replicate samples for main analysis
HEI-2010
Calculated based on intake in prior 24 hours; assessed in two follow-up rounds (4-6 mo and 9-11 mo post-implementation) with 10% replicate subsample in each round; data pooled across two follow-up rounds and replicate samples for main analysis
Other Outcomes (8)
Family food environment
Assessed at baseline (1-3 mo prior to implementation) and two follow up rounds (4-6 mo and 9-11 mo post-implementation); data pooled across two follow-up rounds for main analysis
Exposure to nutrition education and promotion
Past 3 months; assessed at baseline (1-3 mo prior to implementation) and two follow up rounds (4-6 mo and 9-11 mo post-implementation); data pooled across two follow-up rounds for main analysis
Food preferences and beliefs
Assessed at baseline (1-3 mo prior to implementation) and two follow up rounds (4-6 mo and 9-11 mo post-implementation); data pooled across two follow-up rounds for main analysis
- +5 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
HIP
EXPERIMENTALReceived a 30% rebate on targeted fruits and vegetables (TFV) purchased using SNAP benefits in participating retailers. TFV earning the rebate included fresh, canned, frozen, and dried fruits and vegetables without added sugars, fats, oils, or salt, excluding white potatoes, mature legumes (dried beans and peas), and 100% juice.
Non-HIP
NO INTERVENTIONReceived SNAP benefits as usual.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Households with residential or mailing address in Hampden County, Massachusetts
- Receiving SNAP benefits in July 2011
You may not qualify if:
- Child-only cases (households not including at least one member aged 16 or older eligible to serve as SNAP head of household)
- Cases with benefits signed over to residential or treatment facilities
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Abt Associateslead
- Tufts Universitycollaborator
- MAXIMUScollaborator
- USDA Food and Nutrition Servicecollaborator
- Massachusetts Department of Transitional Assistancecollaborator
Related Publications (7)
Abt Associates Inc. Healthy Incentives Pilot: Updated Study Plan. USDA, Food and Nutrition Service, 2011. http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/study_plan.pdf.
BACKGROUNDBartlett S, Beauregard M, Logan C, Komarovsky M, Wommack T, Wilde P, Owens C, Melham M, McLaughlin T. Healthy Incentives Pilot (HIP): Early Implementation Report. USDA, Food and Nutrition Service, 2013. http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/HIP_Early_Implementation.pdf.
BACKGROUNDChu, A. Evaluation of the Healthy Incentives Pilot (HIP): Participant survey weighting methodology. Alexandria, VA: USDA, Food and Nutrition Service, Office of Policy Support, 2014.
BACKGROUNDBartlett S, Klerman J, Olsho L, Logan C, Blocklin M, Beauregard M, Enver A, Wilde P, Owens C, Melhem M. Evaluation of the Healthy Incentives Pilot (HIP): Final Report. USDA, Food and Nutrition Service, 2014. http://www.fns.usda.gov/healthy-incentives-pilot-final-evaluation-report.
RESULTWilde P, Klerman JA, Olsho LEW, Bartlett S. Explaining the impact of USDA's Healthy Incentives Pilot on different spending outcomes. Appl Econ Perspect Policy 2015 (Epub ahead of print; DOI: Epub ahead of print; DOI: doi:10.1093/aepp/ppv028).
RESULTKlerman JAK, Bartlett S, Wilde P, Olsho L. The short-run impact of the Healthy Incentives Pilot Program on fruit and vegetable intake. Am J Agr Econ 2015;96:1372-82.
RESULTOlsho LE, Klerman JA, Wilde PE, Bartlett S. Financial incentives increase fruit and vegetable intake among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participants: a randomized controlled trial of the USDA Healthy Incentives Pilot. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Aug;104(2):423-35. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.129320. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
PMID: 27334234DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Susan Bartlett, PhD
Abt Associates
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Associate
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 4, 2016
First Posted
January 8, 2016
Study Start
June 1, 2010
Primary Completion
November 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
January 8, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Public use dataset available by request from USDA Food \& Nutrition Service.