Functional Connectivity Measurement After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Connectivite
1 other identifier
observational
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To compare functional connectivity after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) between a group of post-comatose TBI with restored consciousness and a group of post-comatose TBI with persistant disorder of consciousness at admission in rehabilitation
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Mar 2015
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 26, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 6, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2019
CompletedMarch 20, 2020
March 1, 2020
3.3 years
February 26, 2015
March 19, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
cortical functional connectivity
the index is calculated from methodology of the article cited below (2)
connectivity index measured on MRI recorded at discharge from intensive care unit (ICU) (30 days post-TBI on average) and compared between the two groups of patients (group "normal level of consciousness" versus group "disorder of consciousness")
Secondary Outcomes (6)
consciousness level measured with Coma recovery scale -revised (CRS-R)
CRS-R score at discharge from intensive care unit (ICU) (30 days post-TBI on average)
consciousness level measured with Coma recovery scale -revised (CRS-R)
day 60 after first MRI
cortical functional connectivity change
connectivity index change (measured on MRI done day 60 after first MRI and compared to MRI done on day 0
Slow wave sleep quantification
EEG at discharge from intensive care unit (ICU) (30 days post-TBI on average)
structural connectivity
DTI At discharge from intensive care unit (ICU) (30 days post-TBI on average)
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Conscious patients
group: TBI patients awoken from comatose state with normal level of consciousness. intervention: fMRI (resting state) and structural (DTI)
DOC patients
group: TBI patients awoken from comatose state with abnormal level of consciousness intervention: fMRI (resting state) and structural (DTI)
Interventions
One hour brain MRI recording without active task for the patient, no sedation
Eligibility Criteria
severe TBI admitted in ICU and ready to be discharged to rehabilitation with or without DOC
You may qualify if:
- severe TBI
- no general anesthesia since 7 days
- no neuroleptic nor hypnotic drug since 3 days
- medical criteria fulfilled to be discharged from ICU
- medical insurance
You may not qualify if:
- age \< 18
- contra indication to MRI
- consent refusal from the family
- neurological trouble before TBI
- patient protected by law
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Grenoble University Hospital
Grenoble, France
Related Publications (2)
Nakase-Richardson R, Whyte J, Giacino JT, Pavawalla S, Barnett SD, Yablon SA, Sherer M, Kalmar K, Hammond FM, Greenwald B, Horn LJ, Seel R, McCarthy M, Tran J, Walker WC. Longitudinal outcome of patients with disordered consciousness in the NIDRR TBI Model Systems Programs. J Neurotrauma. 2012 Jan 1;29(1):59-65. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.1829. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
PMID: 21663544BACKGROUNDAchard S, Delon-Martin C, Vertes PE, Renard F, Schenck M, Schneider F, Heinrich C, Kremer S, Bullmore ET. Hubs of brain functional networks are radically reorganized in comatose patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 11;109(50):20608-13. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1208933109. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
PMID: 23185007BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lydia Oujamaa, MD
University Hospital, Grenoble
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 26, 2015
First Posted
January 6, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2015
Primary Completion
July 1, 2018
Study Completion
October 1, 2019
Last Updated
March 20, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03