Comparison of Oral 30 % Dextrose and iv Midazolam Sedation During MRI in Neonates
1 other identifier
interventional
112
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the effectiveness of oral glucose administration during MRI for imaging of newborns and compare with midazolam sedation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jan 2015
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 30, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2016
CompletedJanuary 1, 2016
December 1, 2015
1.1 years
December 30, 2015
December 31, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Success rate of the procedures to keep the neonates quietened, motionless and slept during the procedure and to consider all images qualitatively appropriate for interpretation
Approximately 1 year
Study Arms (2)
oral 30% glucose
ACTIVE COMPARATORoral 30% glucose total 200 mg/kg with 0.5-1 mL increments
IV midazolam
ACTIVE COMPARATORintravenous administration of midazolam 0.1 mg/kg
Interventions
30% glucose solution was administered orally through a teat. 1 mL 30% glucose solution was added following placement of the teat into the mouth of the newborn. After suckling of 0.5-1 mL glucose solution, the motionless and sleepiness of newborn was evaluated. If the target conditions was not achieved, 0.5-1 mL increments of glucose was added until the newborn kept motionless or asleep.
IV 0.1 mg/kg midazolam was administered.MRI was routinely performed and the newborns who did not keep motionless or asleep and had motion artefacts were sedated with intravenous 0.5 mg/kg propofol.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Neonates requiring MR imaging for diagnosis
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with fever, cold symptoms, suspicion of difficult airway, hypovolemia, cardiac, renal, lung disease, malformations
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Anis Aribogan, Prof
Baskent University Department of Anesthesiology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Ass Prof
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 30, 2015
First Posted
January 1, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2015
Primary Completion
February 1, 2016
Study Completion
February 1, 2016
Last Updated
January 1, 2016
Record last verified: 2015-12