Study Stopped
A corporate decision to terminate the study
Myopia Control Using Soft Bifocal Lenses
Randomised Clinical Trial: Myopia Control Using Soft Bifocal Lenses
1 other identifier
interventional
97
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether bifocal soft contact lenses (CLs) with low addition and nasally decentered optical zone are effective in controlling myopic progression in children. Visual manipulations induced by multifocal soft CLs with high addition have been shown to inhibit eye growth and myopia development in children by recent studies. Several theories have been proposed including alteration in peripheral defocus, reduced accommodation demand, alterations in binocular vision status and increased ocular higher order aberrations. However, those theories remain to be proven and the optical properties and performance of multifocal soft CLs have not been investigated in children.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 8, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 31, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 25, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2018
CompletedFebruary 25, 2019
February 1, 2019
2.7 years
December 8, 2015
February 21, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Changes in axial length in 2 years
Evaluate the changes in cycloplegic axial length in children wearing bifocal soft contact lenses with low addition used as daily disposable lenses compared to control subjects wearing single-vision spectacles for two years with single masking and randomisation
Every 6 months for a period of 2 years
Changes in cycloplegic refractive error in 2 years
Evaluate the changes in cycloplegic refractive error in children wearing bifocal soft contact lenses with low addition used as daily disposable lenses compared to control subjects wearing single-vision spectacles for two years with single masking and randomisation
Every 6 months for a period of 2 years
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Changes in wavefront aberrations in 2 years
Every 6 months for a period of 2 years
Changes in accommodation responses in 2 years
Every 6 months for a period of 2 years
Changes in wavefront aberrations of children with bifocal soft contact lenses in 2 years
Every 6 months for a period of 2 years
Study Arms (2)
Bifocal soft contact lenses
EXPERIMENTALDevice: Bifocal soft contact lenses Use of bifocal contact lenses with nasally decentered optical zone to control the progression of myopia
Single vision spectacles
NO INTERVENTIONControl: Single vision spectacles
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Refractive sphere: -0.75 D to -4.50 D
- Refractive cylinder: not exceed 1.00 D
- Spherical equivalent: -0.75 D to -5.00 D
- Best corrected distance VA (LogMAR): 0.14 or better in each eye and 0.10 or better in both eyes
- Difference in refractive error (spherical equivalent) in the two eyes: not exceed 1.00 D
You may not qualify if:
- Prior history of myopia control treatment
- Contraindication to contact lens wear
- Binocular anomalies (e.g. strabismus)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic Universitylead
- Menicon Co., Ltd.collaborator
- Queensland University of Technologycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Kowloon, Hong Kong
Related Publications (7)
Anstice NS, Phillips JR. Effect of dual-focus soft contact lens wear on axial myopia progression in children. Ophthalmology. 2011 Jun;118(6):1152-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.10.035. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
PMID: 21276616BACKGROUNDFujikado T, Ninomiya S, Kobayashi T, Suzaki A, Nakada M, Nishida K. Effect of low-addition soft contact lenses with decentered optical design on myopia progression in children: a pilot study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep 23;8:1947-56. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S66884. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 25284981BACKGROUNDLam CS, Tang WC, Tse DY, Tang YY, To CH. Defocus Incorporated Soft Contact (DISC) lens slows myopia progression in Hong Kong Chinese schoolchildren: a 2-year randomised clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jan;98(1):40-5. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303914. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
PMID: 24169657BACKGROUNDSankaridurg P, Holden B, Smith E 3rd, Naduvilath T, Chen X, de la Jara PL, Martinez A, Kwan J, Ho A, Frick K, Ge J. Decrease in rate of myopia progression with a contact lens designed to reduce relative peripheral hyperopia: one-year results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Dec 9;52(13):9362-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7260.
PMID: 22039230BACKGROUNDWalline JJ, Greiner KL, McVey ME, Jones-Jordan LA. Multifocal contact lens myopia control. Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Nov;90(11):1207-14. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000036.
PMID: 24061152BACKGROUNDGifford P, Cannon T, Lee C, Lee D, Lee HF, Swarbrick HA. Ocular aberrations and visual function with multifocal versus single vision soft contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2013 Apr;36(2):66-73; quiz 103-4. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2012.10.078. Epub 2012 Nov 10.
PMID: 23146418BACKGROUNDLlorente-Guillemot A, Garcia-Lazaro S, Ferrer-Blasco T, Perez-Cambrodi RJ, Cervino A. Visual performance with simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses. Clin Exp Optom. 2012 Jan;95(1):54-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2011.00666.x. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
PMID: 22070196BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pauline Cho, PhD
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 8, 2015
First Posted
December 31, 2015
Study Start
January 25, 2016
Primary Completion
September 30, 2018
Study Completion
September 30, 2018
Last Updated
February 25, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02