Safety and Efficacy of Using SightSaver Visual Evoked Potential (VEP) for VEP Monitoring in Prone Spine Surgery
SightSaver
A Pilot Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Detecting Subtle Visual Changes During Visual Evoked Potential (VEP) Monitoring Using SightSaver ™ Flash Visual Evoked Potential Stimulator in Spine Prone Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Post-operative visual loss (POVL) following non-ocular surgical procedures is an infrequent but severe complication. Little is understood about this complication, but most cases seem to result from loss of blood flow to the optic nerve. This is a pilot, single center, prospective, randomized, two-arm study involving 20 subjects at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center who are scheduled to undergo spine surgery that requires prone position and at least two hours of general anesthesia or total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Patients will be randomized to either general anesthesia or TIVA, and wear the SightSaver device to monitor visual evoked potentials (VEPs) during surgery in order to detect possible changes in optic nerve function that may lead to POVL. We hypothesize that this new, flexible, disposable device will yield better results and more patient satisfaction than devices currently used for visual monitoring during prone spine surgeries.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 11, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 31, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 1, 2017
CompletedAugust 1, 2017
July 1, 2017
1.5 years
December 11, 2015
March 28, 2016
July 5, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Efficacy in Detecting Subtle Intraoperative VEP Changes Using SightSaver Visual Stimulator During Spine Prone Surgeries Under Balanced General Anesthesia Versus TIVA.
Number of Participants with Subtle Intraoperative VEP Changes Observed Using SightSaver Visual Stimulator During Spine Prone Surgeries Under Balanced General Anesthesia Versus TIVA
VEP waveforms recorded every 30 minutes during the entire procedure for up to 6 hours.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
The Difference in VEP Changes in Amplitude Among Both Groups
Every 30 minutes during surgery for up to 6 hours
The Difference in VEP Changes in Amplitude Among Both Groups
every 30 minutes during the entire procedure for up to 6 hours
Safety of Using SightSaver Visual Stimulator During Spine Prone Surgeries Under Balanced General Anesthesia Versus TIVA
From start of surgery up to 24 hours after surgery
Study Arms (2)
VEP under TIVA
EXPERIMENTALPatients undergoing prone spine surgery will receive an anesthesia regimen using propofol (TIVA) for maintenance
VEP under balanced anesthesia
EXPERIMENTALPatients undergoing prone spine surgery will receive an anesthesia regimen using Desflurane as part of balanced general anesthesia
Interventions
Propofol will be administered for anesthesia maintenance in patients randomized to the TIVA arm of the study. In order to record the VEPs, standard half-inch sub-dermal needle electrodes will be inserted subcutaneously around the visual area and the SightSaverTM visual stimulator will be placed to monitor VEP during surgery.
Balanced general anesthesia with desflurane will be administered for anesthesia maintenance in patients randomized to the balanced general anesthesia arm of the study, In order to record the VEPs, standard half-inch sub-dermal needle electrodes will be inserted subcutaneously around the visual area and the SightSaverTM visual stimulator will be placed to monitor VEP during surgery.
Propofol will be administered for anesthesia maintenance in patients randomized to the TIVA arm of the study. In order to record the VEPs, standard half-inch sub-dermal needle electrodes will be inserted subcutaneously around the visual area and the SightSaverTM visual stimulator will be placed to monitor VEP during surgery.
Balanced general anesthesia with desflurane will be administered for anesthesia maintenance in patients randomized to the balanced general anesthesia arm of the study, In order to record the VEPs, standard half-inch sub-dermal needle electrodes will be inserted subcutaneously around the visual area and the SightSaverTM visual stimulator will be placed to monitor VEP during surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or Female older than 18 years of age
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status of I to IV and scheduled to undergo elective spinal prone position procedures under general anesthesia or TIVA only with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring with an expected duration of surgery to be at least 2 hours
- If female, have been surgically sterilized or are postmenopausal; if of child-bearing potential, must have a negative serum pregnancy test the day of surgery
- Ability and willingness to sign informed consent
- Literate in the English language
You may not qualify if:
- Prisoner status
- Women who are pregnant or lactating/breast feeding
- Patients with a history of contact allergies to foam and/or plastic devices
- Any condition, which, in the opinion of the investigator, would make the subject ineligible for participation in the study, such as a history of unstable cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, hepatic, neurologic (seizures), hematologic or endocrine abnormality (hyperthyroidism, unstable Diabetes type I/II)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Sergio Bergese
- Organization
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sergio D Bergese, MD
Ohio State University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 11, 2015
First Posted
December 31, 2015
Study Start
September 1, 2014
Primary Completion
March 1, 2016
Study Completion
March 1, 2016
Last Updated
August 1, 2017
Results First Posted
August 1, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Enrolled subjects will be assigned a subject identification number and we will not collect any identifiable data