The Use of Telemedicine Tool in Supracondylar Humerus Fractures in Children
T-SCHF
Telemedicine in Supracondylar Humerus Fractures
1 other identifier
interventional
50
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Fractures of the supracondylar region of the humerus are among the most common pediatric injuries requiring the attention of an orthopaedic surgeon. Children with non-displaced fractures (Type I), as well as those with history of elbow trauma, have been traditionally managed with non-surgical immobilization. Recently published clinical guidelines support such practice, based on the result of two prospective studies in which either collar and cuff or posterior splint immobilization were used. When compared to collar and cuff immobilization, posterior splints resulted in better pain relief within the first two weeks of injury; however, critical outcomes, including the incidence of cubitus varus, hyperextension, and loss of reduction, were not reported. While posterior splints appear to be an attractive option for the treatment of non-displaced pediatric elbow fractures, a recent retrospective analysis on the use of posterior splints for the treatment of such injuries reported a small proportion of fractures demonstrating displacement. The potential for non-compliance with the use of removable devices, especially in the older pediatric population, is also a concern. The use of a removable immobilization that can reliably maintain fracture alignment, minimize the risk of non-compliance, and result in similar outcomes as those obtained with regular casting could be advantageous: It appears that such immobilization could be removed easily and safely at home, potentially resulting in a lower number of patient visits, decreased health-care costs, and higher patient/parent satisfaction. Telemedicine, defined as the use of telecommunication and information technologies in order to provide clinical health care at a distance, has been seldom used in the field of pediatric orthopaedics. Commonly mentioned attributes of telemedicine include improved access to healthcare providers, cost containment and increased healthcare efficiency, quality care improvements related to patient satisfaction, and potential reduction in travel time for patients and families. The purpose of this randomized, controlled, prospective study is to assess telemedicine as a tool for the treatment follow-up of non-displaced SCHF fractures in children. Investigators hypothesize that using telemedicine will result in comparable clinical outcomes as those obtained in patients treated in a clinical facility, with increased patient satisfaction and decreased healthcare costs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2016
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 16, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 28, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2017
CompletedMay 16, 2019
May 1, 2019
1.3 years
December 16, 2015
May 14, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Fracture displacement as measured by Baumann Angle
Fracture displacement will be assessed by comparing the initial values of the Baumann angle of the elbow, taken at the 1 week follow up visit, with those obtained during the 8th week follow-up appointment.
At 8 week follow up visit
Fracture angulation as measured by Shaft Condylar Angle
Fracture angulation will be assessed by comparing the initial values of the shaft-condylar angle of the elbow, taken at the 1 week follow up appointment, and the position of the anterior humeral line with respect to the capitellum, with those obtained during the 8th week follow-up appointment.
At 8 week follow up visit
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Recovery of Range of Motion Using a 6" E-Z Read Jamar® Goniometer
8 Weeks after injury
Elbow Pain Using the Revised Faces Pain Scale
Weeks 4 and 8 after injury
Study Arms (2)
Treatment in the Clinic Only
NO INTERVENTIONPatients in Group A will receive their follow-up care entirely at the investigators institution
Treatment in the Clinic and at Home
EXPERIMENTALCast removal at home using a telemedicine tool
Interventions
Instead of receiving follow up treatment in a clinical setting, patients randomized to the arm of the study requiring telemedicine will receive some of their follow up care at home.
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Patients younger than 2 or older than 10 years of age will be excluded, as well as those with a displaced or open elbow fracture, any associated generalized condition that affects the elbow range of motion, history of a previous injury or surgery to the elbows, a neurovascular abnormalities or suspicion of a compartment syndrome or a pathological fracture.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor of Orthopaedics
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 16, 2015
First Posted
December 28, 2015
Study Start
March 1, 2016
Primary Completion
June 1, 2017
Study Completion
June 1, 2017
Last Updated
May 16, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05