Management of Displaced Supracondylar Fractures of the Humerus Using Lateral vs. Crossed K-wires
2 other identifiers
interventional
55
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Completely displaced (Type III) supracondylar fractures of the humerus are treated in the operating room and are held together with pins stuck into the bone. There are two ways of inserting the pins: crossed and laterally. The crossed method is often used because it is thought to be more stable, but this method also carries a risk of hitting the ulnar nerve. It is not known which method is more stable. Our hypothesis is that loss of reduction will be equivalent between the two pinning methods.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2008
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 28, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 1, 2006
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2017
CompletedJanuary 10, 2018
January 1, 2018
9.3 years
July 28, 2006
January 8, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Loss of reduction between lateral K wires and crossed K wires in the treatment of supracondylar fractures of the humerus (at pin removal)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Functional outcome (3 years post-op)
3 years
Rate of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury
Study Arms (2)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORCrossed K wire orientation for surgical management of a type III Supracondylar fracture.
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORLateral K wire orientation for surgical management of a type III Supracondylar fracture.
Interventions
Closed reduction of the fracture followed by crossed K wire percutaneous pinning.
Closed reduction of the fracture followed by lateral K wire percutaneous pinning.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female patients scheduled for closed reduction and K wiring of supracondylar fractures of the humerus under general anaesthesia a
- Type-3 Supracondylar fractures of the humerus.
- Aged 3 to 7 years old
- Consent to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Open supracondylar fractures of the humerus
- Children with pre-operative ulnar nerve injury
- Supracondylar fractures with compartment syndrome needing fasciotomy
- Supracondylar fractures needing vascular repair
- Refusal to provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
British Columbia Children's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3V4, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kishore Mulpuri, MD
The University of British Columbia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 28, 2006
First Posted
August 1, 2006
Study Start
July 1, 2008
Primary Completion
November 1, 2017
Study Completion
November 1, 2017
Last Updated
January 10, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-01