NCT02639897

Brief Summary

Direct laryngoscopy and intubation is an essential initial aspect of airway access during general anesthesia. To perform the procedure effectively, it requires adequate mouth opening, head and neck movement, and a normal temporo-mandibular joint mobility. Any issue with the above three results in a compromised upper airway at the outset and the condition is known as anticipated difficult airway, i.e. an airway that is difficult to access with conventional laryngoscopy and intubation methods. To overcome the difficulty, either one has to resort to newer advanced technique and equipment or the available conventional technique needs to be refined and modified to suit the requirement. While the former requires extraordinary expertise and finances, an option difficult to achieve in developing countries; the latter warrants focused interest to develop alternative approach with the same set of equipments. Since submucous fibrosis and the associated restricted mouth opening have taken the proposition of an epidemic owing to widespread use of betel nut and tobacco; these patients, when requiring surgery, are difficult candidates for GA and airway control. The fact that, when they arrive as pre-surgical candidates, they have variable degree of mouth opening restriction, which if approached with a strategy, may be amenable to conventional control of airway. If investigators paint all the patients with mouth restriction as difficult airway, it will result in uncalled surgical, economic, health system and psychological burden. Therefore, it is prudent to undertake research relating to refinement of airway access techniques with the easily available, cheap and user- friendly equipment (conventional laryngoscope), such that a proportion of above stated burden can be reduced. In view of the above, investigators plan to undertake a study to enhance our working knowledge with a conventional laryngoscope (Macintosh) to facilitate ways to control the airway difficulty secondary to mouth opening restriction. Investigators believe that the prospective knowledge thus generated would help us identify whether there is a feasibility of conventional airway management or an alternative advanced access technique is needed in the first place. This will prevent undue cancellations, delayed surgeries, and patient morbidity.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
46mo left

Started Oct 2026

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 13, 2015

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 28, 2015

Completed
10.8 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2026

Expected
3.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2030

1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2030

Last Updated

April 27, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3.7 years

First QC Date

December 13, 2015

Last Update Submit

April 22, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Macintosh Blade Length Measurement (in centimeters)

    Length of Macintosh blade size 3 and 4 as such (static) and during active direct laryngoscopy (active).

    0 to 5-minutes

  • Macintosh Blade Width Measurement (in centimeters)

    Width of Macintosh blade size 3 and 4 as such (static) and during active direct laryngoscopy (active).

    0 to 5-minutes

  • Inter-incisor Angle on Macintosh Blade Contact Point (in degrees)

    The angle formed by the line between the two contact points, viz. a point formed by upper incisor contact of upper flange curve (convex) of the Macintosh laryngoscope blade, and a point of contact between the lower incisor contact with lower flange curve (concave curve) of the Macintosh laryngoscope blade. The line formed by joining these two contact points with the baseline of the laryngoscope will form an angle. This angle will be noted as functional separation of eugnathic, retrognathic or prognathic maxilo-mandibular orientation

    0 to 5-minutes

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Upper Airway Measurements (in centimeters)

    0 to 5-minutes

  • Correlation Assessment

    0 to 5-minutes

Interventions

Tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy using Macintosh laryngoscope blade

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients scheduled for surgery under general anaesthesia with airway control by direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation

You may qualify if:

  • Consenting adults
  • Both gender
  • Age: 20-65 years
  • Normal preoperative upper airway evaluation and without the presence of anticipated airway access difficulty
  • Patients scheduled for surgery under general anaesthesia with airway control by direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient refusal
  • Anticipated airway access difficulty
  • Edentulous patients
  • Patients with dental problem (missing tooth, overlap, cosmetic treatment)
  • Vulnerable Patients: High risk situation, major surgery, extremes of age, obstetric patients
  • Previously difficult airway

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Sir Ganga Ram Hospital

New Delhi, 110060, India

Location

Study Officials

  • Amitabh Dutta, MD

    Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, INDIA

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Ameya Pappu, MBBS

    Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, INDIA

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Nitin Sethi, DNB

    Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, INDIA

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Consultant

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 13, 2015

First Posted

December 28, 2015

Study Start (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2030

Last Updated

April 27, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Locations