NCT02638870

Brief Summary

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional bowel disorder with recurrent abdominal pain and disordered defecation and is one of the most common gastrointestinal problems. In practice, IBS was frequently diagnosed as an exclusion diagnosis for patients with recurrent abdominal pain without an organic cause. Visceral hypersensitivity is the major contributing factor of abdominal pain in IBS. Accordingly, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are widely used for IBS, especially if abdominal pain is a prominent symptom. Indeed, meta-analysis also exhibits the clinically significant efficacy of low dose TCAs in IBS. Nevertheless, over 40% of IBS patients receiving TCAs had no improvement in symptoms after treatment. Theoretically, if TCAs are used for IBS patients with hypersensitivity, its efficacy could be increased. Although rectal distension test might be used to identify hypersensitive patients with IBS, it has been used only for clinical research because it is painful for the patient. On the contrary, colonoscopy is frequently performed in IBS patients to rule out organic disease and for the purpose of colorectal cancer screening. In a study by Kim and colleagues, IBS patients reported higher pain score after colonoscopy than non-IBS patients. This has prompted the hypothesis that pain scoring during/after colonoscopy could also segregate IBS patients with visceral hypersensitivity showing better treatment response of TCA than those without. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the colonoscopy-related pain perception and the treatment response of amitriptyline in IBS patients and to investigate the predictive values of the colonoscopy-related pain scale in identifying IBS patients with a response to amitriptyline treatment.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
118

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2016

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 20, 2015

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 23, 2015

Completed
9 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2016

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

December 24, 2015

Status Verified

December 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

December 20, 2015

Last Update Submit

December 23, 2015

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • treatment response of abdominal pain/discomfort

    The primary outcome was the treatment response of abdominal pain/discomfort. The investigators defined a response when a patient experienced a fall of 30% in abdominal symptom compared to baseline.

    After the intervention period of 4 weeks, the treatment response was determined.

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • treatment responses of urgency of defecation

    After the intervention period of 4 weeks, the treatment response was determined.

  • treatment responses of bloating

    After the intervention period of 4 weeks, the treatment response was determined.

  • treatment responses of overall IBS symptoms scores

    After the intervention period of 4 weeks, the treatment response was determined.

Interventions

This was a prospective, observational study conducted at Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. Enrolled IBS patients underwent colonoscopy and colonoscopy-related pain score was evaluated. After colonoscopy, all patients received 5 mg amitriptyline once daily at bedtime for the first week and 10 mg for the subsequent 3 weeks. After the intervention period of 4 weeks, the treatment response was determined.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients with IBS according to the Rome III criteria were recruited in the outpatient clinic at Samsung Medical Center. Inclusion criteria were age 18-75 years and no evidence of inflammatory bowel disease or malignancy on colonoscopy.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with IBS according to the Rome III criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • Inflammatory bowel disease or malignancy on colonoscopy.
  • Previous abdominal surgery other than appendectomy or cesarean delivery,
  • Major psychiatric disorders or Beck Depression Inventory-II score of ≥19
  • Significant cardiopulmonary diseases or any malignancies
  • Taking pain modulators including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) or tricyclic antidepressants
  • Polypectomy during colonoscopy.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine

Seoul, 135-710, South Korea

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Interventions

Amitriptyline

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Colonic Diseases, FunctionalColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DibenzocycloheptenesBenzocycloheptenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic ChemicalsPolycyclic Compounds

Study Officials

  • Poong-Lyul Rhee, M.D.,Ph.D.

    Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Yang Won Min, M.D.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Prof.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 20, 2015

First Posted

December 23, 2015

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion

August 1, 2016

Study Completion

October 1, 2016

Last Updated

December 24, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-12

Locations