Evaluating Community Health Centers' Adoption of a New Global Capitation Payment
eCHANGE
2 other identifiers
observational
400,000
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The investigators are conducting a prospective analysis of the Alternative Payment Methodology (APM) demonstration project sites. The investigators' goal is to conduct a cross project analysis of findings. The investigators propose to use mixed methods to study processes and outcomes associated with the APM natural experiment in payment reform. The investigators hypothesize that Community Health Centers (CHCs) participating in the APM demonstration project will redesign their workflows to better focus on patient and population health needs, resulting in reallocation of financial resources, lower overall costs, changes in utilization patterns, and improved quality.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jul 2015
Longer than P75 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 2, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 22, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2020
CompletedOctober 14, 2019
October 1, 2019
4.8 years
December 2, 2015
October 10, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Internal services utilization
Number and type of internal services utilized including number and ratio of "traditional" face to face visits vs. "nontraditional" encounters and communication via phone, personal health record, and email
≤3 years pre-APM implementation and ≤3 years post
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Quality care measures
≤3 years pre-APM implementation and ≤3 years post
External services utilization
≤3 years pre-APM implementation and ≤3 years post
Medicaid expenditures
≤3 years pre-APM implementation and ≤3 years post
Other Outcomes (1)
Study the change processes associated with APM implementation
≤3 years pre-APM implementation and ≤3 years post
Study Arms (2)
Control Group - non-intervention
Clinics that did not participate in the APM project
Alternative Payment Model -intervention
Oregon developed an Alternative Payment Methodology (APM). Under this APM pilot participating CHCs will receive a prospective payment system (PPS) payment as a capitated equivalent in a per-member-per-month rate for all of their Medicaid patients
Interventions
Oregon developed an Alternative Payment Methodology (APM). Under this APM pilot participating CHCs will receive a prospective payment system (PPS) payment as a capitated equivalent in a per-member-per-month rate for all of their Medicaid patients
Eligibility Criteria
Community Health Center (CHC) and clinic patients of which CHCs are participating in the APM demonstration (intervention) or are matched with APM CHCs (control)
You may qualify if:
- Total clinic population:
- established patients at intervention and control clinics aged 2-64
- Medicaid Population:
- Medicaid-enrolled patients at intervention and control clinics aged 2-64
You may not qualify if:
- Total clinic population:
- non-established patients at intervention and control clinics aged 2-64
- Medicaid Population:
- non-Medicaid-enrolled patients at intervention and control clinics aged 2-64
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Oregon Health and Science Universitylead
- OCHIN, Inc.collaborator
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundationcollaborator
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)collaborator
Related Publications (3)
Heintzman J, Cottrell E, Angier H, O'Malley J, Bailey S, Jacob L, DeVoe J, Ukhanova M, Thayer E, Marino M. Impact of Alternative Payment Methodology on Primary Care Visits and Scheduling. J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Jul-Aug;32(4):539-549. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180368.
PMID: 31300574BACKGROUNDAngier H, O'Malley JP, Marino M, McConnell KJ, Cottrell E, Jacob RL, Likumahuwa-Ackman S, Heintzman J, Huguet N, Bailey SR, DeVoe JE. Evaluating community health centers' adoption of a new global capitation payment (eCHANGE) study protocol. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Jan;52:35-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
PMID: 27836506RESULTCottrell EK, Hall JD, Kautz G, Angier H, Likumahuwa-Ackman S, Sisulak L, Keller S, Cameron DC, DeVoe JE, Cohen DJ. Reporting From the Front Lines: Implementing Oregon's Alternative Payment Methodology in Federally Qualified Health Centers. J Ambul Care Manage. 2017 Oct/Dec;40(4):339-346. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0000000000000198.
PMID: 28857887RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John Heintzman, MD, MPH
Oregon Health and Science University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Heather Angier, MPH
Oregon Health and Science University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 2, 2015
First Posted
December 22, 2015
Study Start
July 1, 2015
Primary Completion
May 1, 2020
Study Completion
May 1, 2020
Last Updated
October 14, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-10