A Cluster-randomized Controlled Knowledge Translation Feasibility Study in Alberta Community Pharmacies
2 other identifiers
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Despite evidence of benefit for pharmacist involvement in chronic disease management, the provision of these services in community pharmacy has been suboptimal. The Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARiHS) framework suggests that for knowledge translation to be effective, there must be evidence of benefit, a context conducive to implementation, and facilitation to support uptake. We hypothesize that while the evidence and context components of this framework are satisfied, that uptake into practice has been insufficient because of a lack of facilitation. This protocol describes the rationale and methods of a feasibility study to test a facilitated pharmacy practice intervention based on the PARiHS framework, to assist community pharmacists in increasing the number of formal and documented medication management services completed for patients with diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. Methods: A cluster-randomized before-after design will compare ten pharmacies from within a single organization, with the unit of randomization being the pharmacy. Pharmacies will be randomized to facilitated intervention based on the PARiHS framework or usual practice. The Alberta Context Tool will be used to establish the context of practice in each pharmacy. Pharmacies randomized to the intervention will receive task-focused facilitation from an external facilitator, with the goal of developing alternative team processes to allow the greater provision of medication management services for patients with diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. The primary outcome will be a process evaluation of the needs of community pharmacies to provide more clinical services, the acceptability and uptake of modifications made, and the willingness of pharmacies to participate. Secondary outcomes will include the change in the number of formal and documented medication management services in the aforementioned chronic conditions provided 6 months before, versus after, the intervention between the two groups, and identification of feasible quantitative outcomes for evaluating the effect of the intervention on patient care outcomes. Results: To date, the study has identified and enrolled the ten pharmacies required and initiated the intervention process. Conclusion: This study will be the first to examine the role of facilitation in pharmacy practice, with the goal of scalable and sustainable practice change.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 14, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 16, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 5, 2023
CompletedJanuary 5, 2023
May 1, 2018
11 months
July 14, 2014
September 15, 2016
April 8, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Service Counts From Baseline to End of Intervention Period
Difference in the number of billable services (influenza vaccinations, Comprehensive Annual Care Plans and follow-ups, and Standard Medication Management Assessments and follow-ups) between the intervention period and the 6-months prior to intervention (baseline)
6 month intervention period vs. 6 month baseline prior to intervention
Study Arms (2)
Task-focused facilitation
EXPERIMENTALAn external, task-focused facilitation, informed by an evaluation of contextual factors using the Alberta Context Tool (ACT), will be applied to train community pharmacies to develop alternative team processes that enable a greater number of medication management services to be provided to patients with diabetes, hypertension, and/or dyslipidemia.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONThese sites will continue practice as usual, with no contact from study staff.
Interventions
An external, task-focused facilitation, informed by an evaluation of contextual factors using the Alberta Context Tool (ACT), will be applied to train community pharmacies to develop alternative team processes that enable a greater number of medication management services to be provided to patients with diabetes, hypertension, and/or dyslipidemia.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pharmacies: Community pharmacy locations of a medium-sized pharmacy chain with an interest in and the ability to provide medication management services, but have not fully integrated these activities
- Patients: Any Alberta residents qualifying for pharmacy clinical services as defined by the Alberta Pharmacy Fee Framework
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Albertalead
- Alberta Innovates Health Solutionscollaborator
- University of Waterloocollaborator
- University of Mississippi Medical Centercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
EPICORE Centre, University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2M8, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Rosenthal MM, Tsuyuki RT, Houle SK. A cluster-randomized controlled knowledge translation feasibility study in Alberta community pharmacies using the PARiHS framework: study protocol. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015 Jan 12;1:2. doi: 10.1186/2055-5784-1-2. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 27965782DERIVEDHoule SK, Charrois TL, Faruquee CF, Tsuyuki RT, Rosenthal MM. A randomized controlled study of practice facilitation to improve the provision of medication management services in Alberta community pharmacies. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 Mar-Apr;13(2):339-348. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.02.013. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
PMID: 27017157DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Meagen Rosenthal
- Organization
- University of Mississippi
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ross T Tsuyuki, PharmD, MSc
University of Alberta
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Meagen M Rosenthal, BA, MA, PhD
University of Alberta
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Sherilyn KD Houle, BSP, PhD
University of Waterloo
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 14, 2014
First Posted
July 16, 2014
Study Start
July 1, 2014
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Study Completion
August 1, 2015
Last Updated
January 5, 2023
Results First Posted
January 5, 2023
Record last verified: 2018-05