NCT02634879

Brief Summary

The shift towards value-based reimbursement in U.S. healthcare is accelerating. Payment reform initiatives have taken many shapes-accountable care organizations, bundled payments, value-based purchasing, medical homes, global payment-but all share the common strategy of tying provider (physician, hospital, health system) reimbursement to performance on costs, outcomes, or both. Yet, pay-for-performance has demonstrated little effect on physician behavior and patient outcomes. Payers and provider groups are in need of novel approaches to structure provider incentives-both financial and non-financial-to better promote the delivery of quality, cost-effective care. In this project, the study team plans to study how behavioral economic principles can improve the effectiveness of physician incentives to deliver higher quality and lower cost care. They will test the application of specific behavioral economic principles including immediacy, social pressure, and loss aversion in incentive design and implementation. The study will contribute to an empirical foundation for re-design of existing physician incentive programs and implementation of new policies through secondary data analyses and a multi-arm experiment that evaluate the impact of promising behavioral economics principles on the effectiveness of provider financial and nonfinancial incentives.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
83

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable diabetes

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2016

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 7, 2015

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 18, 2015

Completed
14 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2016

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2017

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

December 12, 2018

Status Verified

December 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

December 7, 2015

Last Update Submit

December 10, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Physician performance

    Measured by physician-level CI composite quality measure score

    Baseline to 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Physician Practice Behavior

    Baseline to 12 months

  • Physician Incentive Payouts

    Throughout the 12 months

  • Patient satisfaction

    6 months to 12 months

Study Arms (3)

Control

NO INTERVENTION

Control Group

Loss Aversion

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Each physician in this arm will have access to funds prior to earning them.

Behavioral: Incentive Change

Group Incentive

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Each physician will receive 50% of their potential incentive based on group performance. Physicians will also receive information on the performance of physicians on key CI measures in their group.

Behavioral: Incentive Change

Interventions

Group IncentiveLoss Aversion

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Physician at participating provider organization (PCP and specific specialties)

You may not qualify if:

  • N/A

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Navathe AS, Volpp KG, Caldarella KL, Bond A, Troxel AB, Zhu J, Matloubieh S, Lyon Z, Mishra Meza A, Sacks L, Nelson C, Patel P, Shea J, Calcagno D, Vittore S, Sokol K, Weng K, McDowald N, Crawford P, Small D, Emanuel EJ. Effect of Financial Bonus Size, Loss Aversion, and Increased Social Pressure on Physician Pay-for-Performance: A Randomized Clinical Trial and Cohort Study. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Feb 1;2(2):e187950. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7950.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Glucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Amol Navathe, MD, PhD

    University of Pennsylvania

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2015

First Posted

December 18, 2015

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion

June 1, 2017

Study Completion

December 1, 2017

Last Updated

December 12, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share