Assessment of the Effectiveness of IV and SC Abatacept (Orencia) Patient Alert Cards in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in a Sample of EU Countries
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Abatacept (Orencia®) IV and SC Patient Alert Cards in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in European Economic Area Countries
1 other identifier
observational
203
5 countries
36
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to determine a) if the implementation of abatacept (Orencia®) patient alert card (PAC) resulted in effective understanding of key safety messages and b) if the degree of understanding of key safety messages is associated with improved clinical and safety outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Nov 2016
Shorter than P25 for all trials
36 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 10, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 17, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 29, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 28, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 28, 2017
CompletedJune 16, 2017
June 1, 2017
5 months
December 10, 2015
June 14, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (13)
Patient survey: Proportion of patients treated with abatacept who are aware of the existence of the PAC
At patient enrolment
Patient survey: Proportion of patients treated with abatacept who have received the PAC
At patient enrolment
Patient survey: Proportion of patients who have utilised the PAC, and the extent of its use
At patient enrolment
Patient survey: Levels of patient knowledge and comprehension related to the important identified risks of allergic reactions associated with abatacept treatment
At patient enrolment
Patient survey: Levels of patient knowledge and comprehension related to the important identified risks of associated with abatacept treatment
At patient enrolment
Patient survey: Mean scores for correct responses for questions grouped by objectives
Objectives: distribution, awareness, utility, utilization and knowledge
At patient enrolment
Patient survey: Mean total score for correct responses
At patient enrolment
HCP survey: Proportion of HCPs who prescribe or administer abatacept in rheumatology centers who are aware of the PAC
Day 1
HCP survey: Proportion of HCPs' who have utilized the PAC, and the extent of its use
Day 1
HCP survey: Levels of HCPs' knowledge and comprehension related to the important identified risks of infections and the need to screen for specific infection prior to initiating or administering abatacept
Day 1
HCP survey: Mean total score for correct responses
Day 1
HCP survey: Mean scores for correct responses for questions grouped by objectives
Objectives: distribution, awareness, utility, utilization and knowledge
Day 1
Retrospective chart review study (clinical outcome study): Proportion of infections leading to hospitalization
Approximately 3 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Major determinants of patients knowledge of the key messages contained in the abatacept IV, Subcutaneous (SC) formulation PACs among patients
At patient enrolment
Major determinants of understanding the key messages contained in the abatacept IV, SC formulation PACs among patients
At patient enrolment
Major determinants of implementation regarding the key messages contained in the abatacept IV, SC formulation PACs among patients
At patient enrolment
Determinants of Health Care Professional (HCP) understanding, Implementation regarding key messages contained in the PAC based on data collected in the abatacept IV and SC formulation PACs among HCPs
Day 1
Retrospective chart review study (clinical outcome study): Proportion of patients with results of any test to screen for Tuberculosis (TB) prior to administration of therapy of abatacept
Upto 8 years
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Patients survey
Adult patients treated with abatacept for rheumatoid arthritis
HCP survey
HCP with at least 1 patient taking abatacept
Retrospective chart review study
Adult patients treated with abatacept for rheumatoid arthritis
Eligibility Criteria
Cohort 1: Patients enrolled by physician or nurse based in hospital rheumatology departments and physician clinics and offices Cohort 2: Physician or nurse based in hospital RA department and physician clinics and offices Cohort 3: Patients enrolled by physician or nurse based in hospital rheumatology departments and physician clinics and offices
You may qualify if:
- Patient survey (cohort 1):
- Patients has taken abatacept within the previous 3 months for rheumatoid arthritis
- Patient is 18 years of age or over
- HCP survey (cohort 2):
- a) Physician or nurses working in rheumatology centers, with at least 1 patient taking abatacept in the previous 6 months for rheumatoid arthritis (by prescribing, administering or by follow up)
- Retrospective chart review study (cohort 3):
- Patient survey questionnaire completed , Informed Consent Form (ICF) signed
You may not qualify if:
- Patient survey:
- Patient has participated in a clinical trial for their arthritis in the previous 12 months
- Currently an employee of BMS
- HCP survey:
- Physicians or nurse who have recruited patients for the Patient survey
- Currently an employee of BMS
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (36)
CHU Limoges - Hopital Dupuytren
Limoges, 87042, France
APHM - Hopital Sainte-Marguerite, Marseille
Paris, 75571, France
Acura Kliniken
Bad Kreuznach, 55543, Germany
Local Institution
Bad Kreuznach, 55543, Germany
Bad Nauheim
Bad Nauheim, 61231, Germany
Local Institution
Bad Nauheim, 61231, Germany
Local Institution
Frankenberg, 9669, Germany
Local Institution
Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
Heidelberg
Heidelberg, 69121, Germany
Local Institution
Zwickau, 8056, Germany
Zwickau
Zwickau, 8056, Germany
Hospital Coruña
A Coruña, 15006, Spain
Hospital Ccal. de Barbastro
Barbastro, 22300, Spain
Hospital Elche
Elche, 3203, Spain
Hospital Elda
Elda, 3600, Spain
Local Institution
Elda, 3600, Spain
Hospital Getafe
Getafe, 28905, Spain
Hospital Gregorio Marañon
Madrid, 28007, Spain
Local Institution
Madrid, 28007, Spain
Hospital Merida
Mérida, 6800, Spain
Hospital Virgen del Puerto
Plasencia, 10600, Spain
Local Institution
Plasencia, 10600, Spain
Hospital Virgen Macarena
Seville, 41009, Spain
Hospital Mutua de Terrasa
Terrassa, 8221, Spain
Local Institution
Malmo, 20502, Sweden
Local Institution
Solna, 17176, Sweden
Nevil Hall Hospital
Abergavenny, NP7 7EG, United Kingdom
Local Institution
Basingstoke, RG24 9NA, United Kingdom
Royal Derby Hospital
Derby, DE22 3NE, United Kingdom
Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Dewsbury, WF13 4HS, United Kingdom
Eastbourne District Gen. Hosp.
East Sussex, BN21 2UD, United Kingdom
Local Institution
Harlow, CM20 1QX, United Kingdom
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Harlow, CM20 1QX, United Kingdom
Arrow Park Hospital
Metropolitan Borough of Wirral, CH49 5PE, United Kingdom
St Helens Hospital
St Helens, WA9 3DA, United Kingdom
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 10, 2015
First Posted
December 17, 2015
Study Start
November 29, 2016
Primary Completion
April 28, 2017
Study Completion
April 28, 2017
Last Updated
June 16, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-06