The Use of CoreBone Coral Particles vs. Cones for Preservation of Alveolar Bone
CoreBone
Comparison Between CoreBone Coral Particles and CoreBone Coral Cones as Graft After Extraction Sockets for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
1 other identifier
interventional
10
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Normally, dentists do not graft the socket after extraction of teeth. When they do graft they use particulate graft devices. The purpose of this study is to examine whether coral particles of 300-450um in comparison to coral cones of 4-5mm wide and 8-10 mm long will preserve alveolar ridge of maxilla or mandible when grafted immediately after tooth extraction. The coral grafting devices are processed from Porites corals grown in aquariums, under controlled environment. The devices are cleansed and sterilized by gamma irradiation. The measurements during follow ups will be performed from CT x rays and measurements by caliber and models.The width and height measurements from follow up x rays and models. The study will be performed on 10 patients, that two parallel teeth are diagnosed to be extracted, in same patient.The data will be analysed for bone loss and compared to previous published studies. Also comparison between two devices will be performed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 8, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 17, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2017
CompletedDecember 17, 2015
December 1, 2015
1 year
November 8, 2015
December 14, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Bone loss will be measured from dental impression models of the grafted site by caliper
The bone loss will be measured from dental impression models of the grafted site that will be taken 2 weeks,3 month,6 month after grafting,using a caliper for measurements from models.
2 weeks, 3 month, 6 month after grafting
Secondary Outcomes (1)
preferred device for socket preservation
2year
Study Arms (2)
CoreBone Cone device
EXPERIMENTALExperimental: CoreBone Cone device After extraction intervention will include the placement of CoreBone Cone device derived from coral that its dimensions is 4-5mm width and 8-10mm height. One cone for each extraction socket.Its advantage is that it fits well the socket site.Measurements from models taken at different times will be analysed for bone loss. Changes in width and height of alveolar bone will be studied at 3 and 6 month. We predict that CoreBone Cones are more effective than particulate device.
CoreBone 500 device
EXPERIMENTALAfter extraction intervention will include the placement of CoreBone500 device derived from coral that is particulate. 0.3-0.5cc for each extraction socket.Its advantage is that it fills well the socket site.Measurements from models taken at different times will be analysed for bone loss. Changes in width and height of alveolar bone will be studied at 3 and 6 month.
Interventions
coral derived devices in the form of Cones are placed in extraction sites for preservation of bone during 6month and more.
coral derived devices in the form of particulate (CoreBone 500) are placed in extraction sites for preservation of bone. Follow up during 6month and more.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- healthy individuals
You may not qualify if:
- smoking
- wound healing is disturbance
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident in maxillofacial department
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 8, 2015
First Posted
December 17, 2015
Study Start
December 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2017
Last Updated
December 17, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-12