Wet Cupping (AlHijamah); Double Versus Single Cupping Technique
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness and safety of double (traditional) versus single (Asian) cupping techniques in chronic low back pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable low-back-pain
Started Nov 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable low-back-pain
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 6, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 16, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2016
CompletedSeptember 22, 2016
December 1, 2015
6 months
December 6, 2015
September 20, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain Numeric rating scale (NRS) before and after intervention
numeric pain scale to be measured before intervention then two weeks after
14 DAYS
Secondary Outcomes (3)
pain: McGill, Persistent Pain Intensity (PPI)
14 days
functioning (Disability) using the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ)
14 days
the Safety of the two wet cupping techniques, by collecting safety data after two weeks of the intervention
up to 14 days
Other Outcomes (1)
Patient satisfaction using the Integrative Medicine Patient Satisfaction Scale (IMPSS)
up to 14 days
Study Arms (2)
wet cupping : double cupping
EXPERIMENTALwet cupping: (traditional cupping technique): cupping (suction) - Scarification - cupping (suction)
wet cupping: single cupping
EXPERIMENTALwet cupping:(Asian cupping): Puncture by needles then cupping (suction):
Interventions
In double cupping (traditional technique): Cupping (suction) then scarification then cupping (suction). In single cupping (Asian): puncture using auto lancet then cupping (suction). In both techniques 4 out of 6 acupoints (BL23, BL24, BL25 bilateral) will be selected.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and Female
- Age equal or more than 18 years up to 60 years
- Chronic low back pain (at least the duration ≥ 3 months)
- Not on anti-inflammatory or pain killers for the last 15 days.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients received wet-cupping therapy before in the last three months
- Patients who have low back pain due to specific and known etiological causes (infection, tumor, osteoporosis, ankylosing spondylitis, fracture, inflammatory process, radicular syndrome, and cauda equinal syndrome)
- Patients who are inappropriate to the wet cupping treatment (AIDS, Hepatitis, Tuberculosis, Syphilis. The referring physicians will be advised to exclude those patients)
- Patients currently receiving any anticoagulant, antiplatelet medications
- Anemia, thrombocytopenia, Coagulopathy or Hemorrhagic disease like hemophilia
- Had undergone a surgery, or had bleeding injury, or had blood donation
- Uncontrolled hypertension, Ischemic heart disease, previous transient ischemic attack or stroke
- Diabetes, known renal and / or hepatic diseases
- Patients who are in pregnancy or have plan to conception
- Previously or currently drug addicts
- Any other severe disease or disabling medical condition
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
King Fahad Hospital
Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
King Fahad Hospital
Madinah, Madinah, Saudi Arabia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sulaiman AlEidi, MBBS
NCCAM , MOH, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- STUDY CHAIR
Mohamed Khalil, MD
NCCAM.MOH
- STUDY CHAIR
Ashry Gad Mohamed, MD
King Saud University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 6, 2015
First Posted
December 16, 2015
Study Start
November 1, 2015
Primary Completion
May 1, 2016
Study Completion
May 1, 2016
Last Updated
September 22, 2016
Record last verified: 2015-12