NCT02630641

Brief Summary

The general hypothesis put forward in this study is that the degree of cohesion (agreement) in the relationship, or dyadic adjustment affects a patient's quality of life and clinical course during the first few critical months following diagnosis and the introduction of treatment. The level of cohesion in the relationship is certainly not the only parameter associated with changes in the quality of life. Other factors must also be investigated such as level of education, circumstances surrounding the diagnosis (new diagnosis or relapse), management (single therapy or adjuvant therapy), the level of physical activity, the patient's age and the presence of functional disorders, etc.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,000

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2015

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 11, 2015

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 15, 2015

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

May 12, 2023

Status Verified

May 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

December 11, 2015

Last Update Submit

May 11, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in quality of life of the patient.

    Assessment of the dyadic adjustment and its impact on the quality of life of the patient through self-questionnaire by the patient and the partner

    Baseline and 6 months

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Assessment of representations of illness

    Baseline

  • Correlations between quality of life specific to prostate cancer, general quality of life and dyadic adjustment.

    6 months

  • Proportion of couples with a consistency or inconsistency level of dyadic adjustment

    6 months

  • Investigation of factors associated with patient's perception of dyadic adjustment on changes quality of life

    Baseline and 6 months

Study Arms (1)

Prostate cancer patients

Drug: Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) agonist therapy

Interventions

This is a non-interventional study. Thus, investigators are free to choose GnRH agonist therapy product, and modalities of administration in accordance with local Summary of Product Characteristics.

Prostate cancer patients

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Prostate cancer patients and their partners recruited by urologists.

You may qualify if:

  • Patient presenting with histologically confirmed prostate cancer.
  • Patient eligible to start GnRH agonist therapy, either as monotherapy or adjuvant therapy, and for whom one of these treatments was selected voluntarily by the urologist, prior to the start of the study.
  • Patient currently living with the same partner for at least 6 months.
  • Patient and partner capable of reading, understanding and returning an evaluation self-questionnaire 6 months after the initial consultation.
  • Patient giving its written consent to participate to the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • The subject is participating in another clinical trial.
  • Patient who has received a GnRH agonist therapy during the last 2 years.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ipsen Central Contact

Paris, France

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Droupy S, Colson MH, Pello-Leprince-Ringuet N, Perrot V, Descazeaud A. EQUINOXE study: Impact of relational cohesion and sexuality on the quality of life of patients treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist for prostate cancer. BJUI Compass. 2021 Oct 19;3(1):45-54. doi: 10.1002/bco2.92. eCollection 2022 Jan.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Interventions

Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pituitary Hormone-Releasing HormonesHypothalamic HormonesPeptide HormonesHormonesHormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone AntagonistsNeuropeptidesPeptidesAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsOligopeptidesNerve Tissue ProteinsProteins

Study Officials

  • Ipsen Medical Director

    Ipsen

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 11, 2015

First Posted

December 15, 2015

Study Start

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion

November 1, 2017

Study Completion

November 1, 2017

Last Updated

May 12, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-05

Locations