NCT02627378

Brief Summary

A highly pathogenic human coronavirus causing respiratory disease emerged in Saudi Arabia in 2012. This viral infection termed Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) is associated with high mortality rate in approximately 36% of reported patients. The World Health Organization (WHO) reported 1,374 laboratory-confirmed worldwide infections, including at least 490 related deaths, from September, 2012, to July 24, 2015.2 The higher incidence of MERS-CoV infections in Saudi Arabia may be related to multiple factors, including seasonality, increased proactive screening, poor infection control measures, low relative humidity, and high temperature. Infected patients with MERS-CoV usually have abnormal findings on chest radiography, ranging from subtle to extensive unilateral and bilateral abnormalities. MERS progresses rapidly to respiratory failure, in approximately 2/3 of infected patients, which has a high mortality rate, particularly in immunocompromised patients. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has emerged as a rescue therapy in patients with refractory hypoxemia during the H1N1 epidemic.The use of veno-venous (VV)-ECMO provides respiratory support for patients with respiratory failure, whereas the use of veno-arterial (VA)-ECMO could be helpful in those with cardiorespiratory failure.10 However, the survival rate of the infected patients with H1N1 who required the use of ECMO varies considerably among the Caucasian and Asian countries (90% survival in Sweden and 83% in the UK13 vs. 35% in Japan). This large discrepancy could be explained with lack of satisfactory equipment, therapeutic guidelines, training of staff, and effective systems allowing patient transfer to the dedicated ECMO centres. Guery and co-investigators described the use of ECMO in two French patients with cardiorespiratory failure secondary to MERS-CoV infection.This has been extended for treatment of refractory hypoxemic respiratory failure during the Saudi MERS-CoV outbreak.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
35

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2012

Typical duration for phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2012

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2015

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 4, 2015

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 10, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

December 10, 2015

Status Verified

December 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

December 4, 2015

Last Update Submit

December 9, 2015

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Mortality rate

    In-hospital mortality

    For 2 months after admission to hospital

Secondary Outcomes (20)

  • Use of antiviral medications

    For 2 months after admission to hospital

  • Use of steroid medications

    For 2 months after admission to hospital

  • Use of interferons

    For 2 months after admission to hospital

  • Use of immunoglobulin

    For 2 months after admission to hospital

  • Use of vasopressor medications

    For 2 months after admission to hospital

  • +15 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (11)

  • Number of participants with diabetes milletus on blood glucose test

    For 1 month before admission to hospital

  • Number of participants with pregnancy on pregnancy test

    For 9 months before admission to hospital

  • Number of participants with hypertension on blood pressure recordings

    For 1 month before admission to hospital

  • +8 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients received Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) support

Other: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Non Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Patients did not receive Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) support

Other: Non Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Interventions

Patients received veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) support

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Patients received no Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) support

Non Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Positive infection with Middle East Respiratory Syndrome virus
  • Refractory hypoxemic respiratory failure
  • Eligible for use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support (ECMO)

You may not qualify if:

  • Neonates
  • Children
  • Patients treated with ECMO for primary cardiac failure
  • Following heart transplantation
  • Following lung transplantation
  • Following cardiac surgery
  • Patients with an alternative diagnosis who had no virus isolated

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dammam University KFHU

Khobar, EP, 31952, Saudi Arabia

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hypoxia

Interventions

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Signs and Symptoms, RespiratorySigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory TherapyTherapeuticsExtracorporeal CirculationSurgical Procedures, Operative

Study Officials

  • Anees Sindi, FRCPC

    King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Muhammed S Alshahrani, FRCPC

    University of Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2015

First Posted

December 10, 2015

Study Start

September 1, 2012

Primary Completion

June 1, 2015

Study Completion

October 1, 2015

Last Updated

December 10, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations