Saudi Outcomes of ECMO-treated MERS-CoV Patients
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Induced Respiratory Failure
1 other identifier
interventional
35
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A highly pathogenic human coronavirus causing respiratory disease emerged in Saudi Arabia in 2012. This viral infection termed Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) is associated with high mortality rate in approximately 36% of reported patients. The World Health Organization (WHO) reported 1,374 laboratory-confirmed worldwide infections, including at least 490 related deaths, from September, 2012, to July 24, 2015.2 The higher incidence of MERS-CoV infections in Saudi Arabia may be related to multiple factors, including seasonality, increased proactive screening, poor infection control measures, low relative humidity, and high temperature. Infected patients with MERS-CoV usually have abnormal findings on chest radiography, ranging from subtle to extensive unilateral and bilateral abnormalities. MERS progresses rapidly to respiratory failure, in approximately 2/3 of infected patients, which has a high mortality rate, particularly in immunocompromised patients. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has emerged as a rescue therapy in patients with refractory hypoxemia during the H1N1 epidemic.The use of veno-venous (VV)-ECMO provides respiratory support for patients with respiratory failure, whereas the use of veno-arterial (VA)-ECMO could be helpful in those with cardiorespiratory failure.10 However, the survival rate of the infected patients with H1N1 who required the use of ECMO varies considerably among the Caucasian and Asian countries (90% survival in Sweden and 83% in the UK13 vs. 35% in Japan). This large discrepancy could be explained with lack of satisfactory equipment, therapeutic guidelines, training of staff, and effective systems allowing patient transfer to the dedicated ECMO centres. Guery and co-investigators described the use of ECMO in two French patients with cardiorespiratory failure secondary to MERS-CoV infection.This has been extended for treatment of refractory hypoxemic respiratory failure during the Saudi MERS-CoV outbreak.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1
Started Sep 2012
Typical duration for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 4, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 10, 2015
CompletedDecember 10, 2015
December 1, 2015
2.7 years
December 4, 2015
December 9, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mortality rate
In-hospital mortality
For 2 months after admission to hospital
Secondary Outcomes (20)
Use of antiviral medications
For 2 months after admission to hospital
Use of steroid medications
For 2 months after admission to hospital
Use of interferons
For 2 months after admission to hospital
Use of immunoglobulin
For 2 months after admission to hospital
Use of vasopressor medications
For 2 months after admission to hospital
- +15 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (11)
Number of participants with diabetes milletus on blood glucose test
For 1 month before admission to hospital
Number of participants with pregnancy on pregnancy test
For 9 months before admission to hospital
Number of participants with hypertension on blood pressure recordings
For 1 month before admission to hospital
- +8 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients received Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) support
Non Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatients did not receive Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) support
Interventions
Patients received veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) support
Patients received no Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) support
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Positive infection with Middle East Respiratory Syndrome virus
- Refractory hypoxemic respiratory failure
- Eligible for use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support (ECMO)
You may not qualify if:
- Neonates
- Children
- Patients treated with ECMO for primary cardiac failure
- Following heart transplantation
- Following lung transplantation
- Following cardiac surgery
- Patients with an alternative diagnosis who had no virus isolated
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal Universitylead
- Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabiacollaborator
- King Abdulaziz Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Dammam University KFHU
Khobar, EP, 31952, Saudi Arabia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anees Sindi, FRCPC
King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Muhammed S Alshahrani, FRCPC
University of Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 4, 2015
First Posted
December 10, 2015
Study Start
September 1, 2012
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Study Completion
October 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 10, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share