Mid-Atlantic Research Group Single-Operator Cholangioscopic Assessment of Biliary Strictures

NCT02615210 | Terminated DMC

• 1 other identifier: 23154
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 3
• Locations: 0 countries
• Sites: N/A

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if cholangioscopically-directed biopsies provide a higher diagnostic yield for malignancy in the setting of indeterminate biliary strictures when compared to standard means of sampling.

Conditions

Biliary Tract Neoplasms

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Number of malignant diagnoses across hree-sample techniques (Spy bite, forceps biopsy, brushings)

  Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the three-sample technique (Spy bite, forceps biopsy, brushings) compared to the two-sample technique (forceps biopsy and brushing) in differentiating malignant from benign biliary strictures

  72 Hours

Secondary Outcomes (3)

• Number of patients who receive additional diagnostic studies without receiving a cancer diagnosis

  1 year

• Endoscopic Satisfaction with SOC-directed biopsy

  2 hours

• Time from procedure to the initiation of treatment (in cases of malignancy)

  1 year

Study Arms (2)

Standard

NO INTERVENTION

Standard of care biopsies with optional SOC-directed biopsy afterwards

Study

EXPERIMENTAL

SOC-directed biopsies using the SpyGlass System plus standard of care biopsies

Device: SOC-directed biopsies using the SpyGlass System

Interventions

SOC-directed biopsies using the SpyGlass System DEVICE

The cholangioscopy procedure with the SpyGlass System is performed by a single operator with the SpyScope Access and Delivery Catheter positioned just below the operating channel of the duodenoscope. SpyBite Biopsy Forceps guided by the SpyScope Catheter are introduced and endoscopic-guided biopsy is taken at the level of the stricture. Target lesions will be identified under direct visualization using the SOC system, and 6-8 bites will be performed with the SpyBite forceps. Once SOC-directed biopsies are obtained, the SOC system will be withdrawn into the working channel of the duodenoscope and removed Patient will be contacted monthly to determine if they have undergone any additional procedures and to record potential adverse events.

Study

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 90 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Age greater than or equal to 18 years
• Presence of indeterminate biliary strictures with clinical indications for ERCP. Strictures are considered indeterminate when evaluation including cross-sectional imaging is non-diagnostic. Patients who have previously undergone ERCP with sampling will be included, as well as those who have not previously undergone ERCP.
• Strictures located above the intrapancreatic bile duct
• The Subject's physician determines and ERCP is clinically indicated
• Able to provide informed consent

You may not qualify if:

• Prior enrollment in the study or another study evaluating biliary strictures
• Presence of extrahepatic malignancy or previously-diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma
• Pregnancy
• At-risk populations including prisoners and mentally challenged
• Unwilling to provide informed consent
• Medically unfit to undergo ERCP
• History of liver transplant

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Temple University: lead
• Thomas Jefferson University: collaborator
• University of Pennsylvania: collaborator
• University of Pittsburgh Medical Center: collaborator
• Geisinger Clinic: collaborator
• McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre: collaborator

Related Publications (15)

• Lee JG, Leung JW, Baillie J, Layfield LJ, Cotton PB. Benign, dysplastic, or malignant--making sense of endoscopic bile duct brush cytology: results in 149 consecutive patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995 May;90(5):722-6.

  PMID: 7733076 BACKGROUND

• Glasbrenner B, Ardan M, Boeck W, Preclik G, Moller P, Adler G. Prospective evaluation of brush cytology of biliary strictures during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy. 1999 Nov;31(9):712-7. doi: 10.1055/s-1999-73.

  PMID: 10604612 BACKGROUND

• Kipp BR, Stadheim LM, Halling SA, Pochron NL, Harmsen S, Nagorney DM, Sebo TJ, Therneau TM, Gores GJ, de Groen PC, Baron TH, Levy MJ, Halling KC, Roberts LR. A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Sep;99(9):1675-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30281.x.

  PMID: 15330900 BACKGROUND

• Cote GA, Sherman S. Biliary stricture and negative cytology: what next? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Sep;9(9):739-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.04.011. Epub 2011 Apr 22. No abstract available.

  PMID: 21554986 BACKGROUND

• Draganov PV, Chauhan S, Wagh MS, Gupte AR, Lin T, Hou W, Forsmark CE. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional and cholangioscopy-guided sampling of indeterminate biliary lesions at the time of ERCP: a prospective, long-term follow-up study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Feb;75(2):347-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.020.

  PMID: 22248602 BACKGROUND

• de Bellis M, Fogel EL, Sherman S, Watkins JL, Chappo J, Younger C, Cramer H, Lehman GA. Influence of stricture dilation and repeat brushing on the cancer detection rate of brush cytology in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Aug;58(2):176-82. doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.345.

  PMID: 12872082 BACKGROUND

• Fogel EL, deBellis M, McHenry L, Watkins JL, Chappo J, Cramer H, Schmidt S, Lazzell-Pannell L, Sherman S, Lehman GA. Effectiveness of a new long cytology brush in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Jan;63(1):71-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.08.039.

  PMID: 16377319 BACKGROUND

• de Bellis M, Sherman S, Fogel EL, Cramer H, Chappo J, McHenry L Jr, Watkins JL, Lehman GA. Tissue sampling at ERCP in suspected malignant biliary strictures (Part 2). Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Nov;56(5):720-30. doi: 10.1067/mge.2002.129219. No abstract available.

  PMID: 12397282 BACKGROUND

• De Bellis M, Sherman S, Fogel EL, Cramer H, Chappo J, McHenry L Jr, Watkins JL, Lehman GA. Tissue sampling at ERCP in suspected malignant biliary strictures (Part 1). Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Oct;56(4):552-61. doi: 10.1067/mge.2002.128132. No abstract available.

  PMID: 12297773 BACKGROUND

• Weilert F, Bhat YM, Binmoeller KF, Kane S, Jaffee IM, Shaw RE, Cameron R, Hashimoto Y, Shah JN. EUS-FNA is superior to ERCP-based tissue sampling in suspected malignant biliary obstruction: results of a prospective, single-blind, comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Jul;80(1):97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.12.031. Epub 2014 Feb 19.

  PMID: 24559784 BACKGROUND

• Chen YK, Pleskow DK. SpyGlass single-operator peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy system for the diagnosis and therapy of bile-duct disorders: a clinical feasibility study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 May;65(6):832-41. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.01.025.

  PMID: 17466202 BACKGROUND

• Draganov PV, Lin T, Chauhan S, Wagh MS, Hou W, Forsmark CE. Prospective evaluation of the clinical utility of ERCP-guided cholangiopancreatoscopy with a new direct visualization system. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 May;73(5):971-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Mar 17.

  PMID: 21419408 BACKGROUND

• Chen YK, Parsi MA, Binmoeller KF, Hawes RH, Pleskow DK, Slivka A, Haluszka O, Petersen BT, Sherman S, Deviere J, Meisner S, Stevens PD, Costamagna G, Ponchon T, Peetermans JA, Neuhaus H. Single-operator cholangioscopy in patients requiring evaluation of bile duct disease or therapy of biliary stones (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Oct;74(4):805-14. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.016. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

  PMID: 21762903 BACKGROUND

• Ramchandani M, Reddy DN, Gupta R, Lakhtakia S, Tandan M, Darisetty S, Sekaran A, Rao GV. Role of single-operator peroral cholangioscopy in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary lesions: a single-center, prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Sep;74(3):511-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.034. Epub 2011 Jul 7.

  PMID: 21737076 BACKGROUND

• Siddiqui AA, Mehendiratta V, Jackson W, Loren DE, Kowalski TE, Eloubeidi MA. Identification of cholangiocarcinoma by using the Spyglass Spyscope system for peroral cholangioscopy and biopsy collection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 May;10(5):466-71; quiz e48. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.12.021. Epub 2011 Dec 16.

  PMID: 22178463 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Biliary Tract Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Digestive System Neoplasms; Neoplasms by Site; Neoplasms; Biliary Tract Diseases; Digestive System Diseases

Study Officials

• Jennifre L Maranki, M.D.

  Temple University

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: September 22, 2015
• First Posted: November 26, 2015
• Study Start: November 1, 2015
• Primary Completion: November 1, 2017
• Study Completion: November 1, 2018
• Last Updated: November 30, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-11