NCT02613013

Brief Summary

This is a 10-centre randomized controlled clinical trial to explore whether laser peripheral iridoplasty (LPIP) plus laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) is more effective than single LPI to control the progression of primary angle closure with multi-mechanism based on the UBM classification.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
240

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2015

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2015

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 5, 2015

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 24, 2015

Completed
4.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2020

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

September 6, 2018

Status Verified

September 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

4.4 years

First QC Date

November 5, 2015

Last Update Submit

September 5, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Progression rate determined by number of patients who progress after laser treatment for each group.

    PAC progression defined as presence of any of the following: 1. Acute angle closure crisis 2. Intraocular (IOP) was 8mmHg higher than initiation 1 month after the laser procedure 3. IOP was ≥22mmHg when measured three times of continuous 1 month after the lase procedure 4. The progression of peripheral anterior synechiae ≥ 1 clock hour within 3 years after the laser procedure as measured by gonioscopic examination. 5. glaucomatous neuropathy within 3 years after the laser procedure

    3 years

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Additional medication or surgery required questionnaire

    3 years

  • The change of the best corrected visual acuity after the laser procedure

    3 years

  • The number of the cornea endothelial cells

    3 years

  • The change in angle width and configuration as measured by ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM)

    3 years

Study Arms (2)

single LPI

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

LPI was performed with a VISULAS diode laser of 532 nm (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA). 30 minutes prior to the procedure, a drop of 2% pilocarpine will be instilled into the eye every 15 minutes, Topical anaesthesia will be administered. The treatment site was selected in the superior nasal iris or in a crypt, where present. Treatment was initiated with a pulse of 3-5mJ, the power was increased until patency was achieved, the opening of iris \>0.1mm. and patency was determined by direct visualization of the posterior chamber.

Device: neodymium:yttrium-aluminum- garnet laserDrug: PilocarpineDrug: ProparacaineProcedure: LPI

LPIP plus LPI

EXPERIMENTAL

LPIP was applied with a VISULAS diode laser of 532 nm (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA). 30 minutes prior to the procedure, a drop of 2% pilocarpine will be instilled into the eye every 15 minutes, Topical anaesthesia will be administered. Twenty to 30 spots of 250-300 mW power with 300-500 microns of size and duration of 400-500 ms were applied. Power was modified arbitrarily until an effective iris contraction was obtained. Effective iris contraction was considered as a concentric movement around the laser spot, with minimal iris pigmentation and immediate angle opening observed through the lens mirrors using a Goldmann lens. Power was lowered if there was any bursting sound perceived, pigment dispersion, air bubbles or considerable pain. LPI was performed after LPIP procedure

Device: neodymium:yttrium-aluminum- garnet laserDevice: frequency-doubled Q-switched neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet 532-nm laserDrug: PilocarpineProcedure: LPIP plus LPIDrug: Proparacaine

Interventions

a neodymium:yttrium-aluminum- garnet laser was used to perform the LPI

LPIP plus LPIsingle LPI

a frequency-doubled Q-switched neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet 532-nm laser was used to perform the LPIP

LPIP plus LPI

30 minutes prior to the procedure, a drop of 2% pilocarpine will be instilled into the eye every 15 minutes, Topical anaesthesia (Proparacaine) will be administered

LPIP plus LPIsingle LPI
LPIP plus LPIPROCEDURE

LPIP was applied with a VISULAS diode laser of 532 nm (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA). 30 minutes prior to the procedure, a drop of 2% pilocarpine will be instilled into the eye every 15 minutes, Topical anaesthesia will be administered. Twenty to 30 spots of 250-300 mW power with 300-500 microns of size and duration of 400-500 ms were applied. Power was modified arbitrarily until an effective iris contraction was obtained. Effective iris contraction was considered as a concentric movement around the laser spot, with minimal iris pigmentation and immediate angle opening observed through the lens mirrors using a Goldmann lens. Power was lowered if there was any bursting sound perceived, pigment dispersion, air bubbles or considerable pain. LPI was performed after LPIP procedure.

LPIP plus LPI

30 minutes prior to the procedure, a drop of 2% pilocarpine will be instilled into the eye every 15 minutes, Topical anaesthesia (Proparacaine) will be administered

LPIP plus LPIsingle LPI
LPIPROCEDURE

LPI was performed with a VISULAS diode laser of 532 nm (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA). 30 minutes prior to the procedure, a drop of 2% pilocarpine will be instilled into the eye every 15 minutes, Topical anaesthesia (Proparacaine) will be administered. The treatment site was selected in the superior nasal iris or in a crypt, where present. Treatment was initiated with a pulse of 3-5mJ, the power was increased until patency was achieved, the opening of iris \>0.1mm. and patency was determined by direct visualization of the posterior chamber.

single LPI

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Clinical diagnosis of primary angle closure (PAC), with IOP≤30mmHg and PAS≤270°.
  • PAC with multi-mechanism based on UBM examination (multi-mechanism is defined as primary angle closure is caused by pupil block plus at least one kind of non-pupil block factors like (relative anterior position and thick of the ciliary body, the big volume of the iris, the anterior location of the iris insertion into the ciliary body)or any two or more kinds of combination.
  • Visual acuity≥ 20/40
  • Age between 40-75 years old Chinese people
  • If both eyes of a patient are eligible for the study, the e eye had worse visual acuity will be selected. Only one eye per patient is eligible for the study.
  • Drug washout:
  • Eligible patients who are already on anti-glaucoma medications are required to have drug washout before being randomized. Various medications have different washout periods: Prostaglandin analogues 4 weeks, Beta blockers 3 weeks, Adrenergic agonist 2 weeks, Cholinergic agonist 5 days, Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors 5 days. Patients whose IOP\>30 mm Hg during this washout period will be stopped from further washout and be withdrawn from the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Unwilling or unable to give consent, unwilling to accept randomization, or unable to return for scheduled protocol visits.
  • Angle closure due to secondary causes (subluxed lens, neovascular, uveitic, traumatic, post-operative)
  • Previous incisional intraocular surgery or ocular laser in study eye (LPI or LPIP, cyclodestructive procedure, cataract surgery)
  • Primary angle closure with glaucomatous neuropathy.
  • Have cataract in the studying eye and anticipated to have cataract surgery in the coming 3 years; the existing cataract affect visual field examination and fundus examination; the visual acuity \<20/40 due to the existing cataract.
  • Who are using IOP lowing drugs and do not have drug washout
  • Need for glaucoma surgery combined with other ocular procedures (i.e. cataract surgery, penetrating keratoplasty, or retinal surgery) or anticipated need for urgent additional ocular surgery
  • Coexisting other ocular diseases (i.e. cornea abnormal or cornea infection, Iridocorneal endothelial syndrome or anterior segment dysgenesis, nanophthalmos, high myopia (\>6.0D), Chronic or recurrent uveitis, ocular cancer, trauma, central retinal vein occlusion, central retinal artery occlusion, retinal detachment)
  • cornea endothelium counting \<1000/mm2
  • need local or systemic steroid long-term use
  • Unwilling to discontinue contact lens use after surgery
  • Who are taking parting in other drug clinical trials
  • Pregnant or nursing women
  • Severe systemic disease (i.e. diabetes mellitus, hypertension, the end stage of cardiac disease, nephropathy disease, respiratory disease and cancer.
  • Allergic to pilocarpine or alcaine
  • +1 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center

Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, China

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Chen S, Lv J, Fan S, Zhang H, Xie L, Xu L, Jiang B, Yuan H, Liang Y, Li S, Chen P, Zhang X, Wang N; Multi-mechanism Angle Closure Study (MACs) group. Laser peripheral iridotomy versus laser peripheral iridotomy plus laser peripheral iridoplasty in the treatment of multi-mechanism angle closure: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Mar 17;18(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1860-4.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma, Angle-Closure

Interventions

LasersPilocarpineSLC7A7 protein, humanproxymetacaine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

GlaucomaOcular HypertensionEye Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Optical DevicesEquipment and SuppliesRadiation Equipment and SuppliesAlkaloidsHeterocyclic Compounds

Central Study Contacts

xiulan zhang, MD,PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD,PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2015

First Posted

November 24, 2015

Study Start

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion

March 1, 2020

Study Completion

April 1, 2022

Last Updated

September 6, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-09

Locations