Sienna+® Injection Time Study 4 Arms
Sentimag02
Sienna+® Injection Time Study: A Prospective Multicentre, Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Performance of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide vs. Standard Technique as Tracer in Sentinel Node Biopsy
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Patients with breast cancer normally undergo a labelling with radioactive tracer typically 1 day before surgery, which enables the surgeon to localize the sentinel lymph node during surgery. This pilot study uses the magnetic Sentimag technique to mark the lymph nodes either 1 or 4-6 days before surgery to investigate the concordance with the standard technique.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Feb 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 18, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 24, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2016
CompletedNovember 24, 2015
November 1, 2015
4 months
November 18, 2015
November 23, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Detection rate per Patient
Proportion of successfully detected sentinel nodes (detection rate per patient) with both methods.
During surgery
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Number of lymph nodes excised
During surgery
Nodal detection rate
During surgery
Malignancy rate
1-2 days post surgery
Study Arms (4)
Sienna+ retro and Technetium 1
ACTIVE COMPARATORSienna+® is administered retro-mamillary 1 day before surgery for sentinel node marking. Technetium as standard technique is employed according to the gold standard protocol one day before surgery. The Sentimag device is used during surgery to detect the lymph nodes in parallel to the standard technique.
Sienna+ peri and Technetium 1
ACTIVE COMPARATORSienna+® is administered peri-tumorally 1 day before surgery for sentinel node marking. Technetium as standard technique is employed according to the gold standard protocol one day before surgery. The Sentimag device is used during surgery to detect the lymph nodes in parallel to the standard technique.
Sienna+ retro 4-6 and Technetium 1
ACTIVE COMPARATORSienna+® is administered retro-mamillary 4-6 days before surgery for sentinel node marking. Technetium as standard technique is employed according to the gold standard protocol one day before surgery. The Sentimag device is used during surgery to detect the lymph nodes in parallel to the standard technique.
Sienna+ peri 4-6 and Technetium 1
ACTIVE COMPARATORSienna+® is administered peri-tumorally 4-6 days before surgery for sentinel node marking. Technetium as standard technique is employed according to the gold standard protocol one day before surgery. The Sentimag device is used during surgery to detect the lymph nodes in parallel to the standard technique.
Interventions
Sentinel node marking with Sienna+ retro-mamillary 1 day before surgery
Sentinel node marking with Sienna+ peri-tumorally 1 day before surgery
Sentinel node marking with Sienna+ retro-mamillary 4-6 days before surgery
Sentinel node marking with Sienna+ peri-tumorally 4-6 days before surgery
Sentinel node marking with Technetium 1 day before surgery
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject has a diagnosis of primary breast cancer
- Subject has been scheduled for surgery with a sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure
- Subject is ≥18 years old at time of consent
- Subject has an ECOG performance status of Grade 0-2
- Subject has a clinical negative node status
- Subject is available for the follow-up
You may not qualify if:
- Subject is pregnant or lactating
- Subject has a radiological evidence of metastatic cancer
- Subject has had previous axilla surgery or reduction mammoplasty
- Subject has impaired lymphatic function
- Subject has had a preoperative radiation therapy
- Subject has iron overload disease or iron/dextran intolerance
- Subject has a pacemaker
- Subject is under guardianship
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Kantonsspital Badenlead
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Berncollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Kantonsspital Baden
Baden, 5404, Switzerland
Inselspital Bern, Universitätsklinik für Frauen.
Bern, 3010, Switzerland
Related Publications (4)
Thill M, Kurylcio A, Welter R, van Haasteren V, Grosse B, Berclaz G, Polkowski W, Hauser N. The Central-European SentiMag study: sentinel lymph node biopsy with superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) vs. radioisotope. Breast. 2014 Apr;23(2):175-9. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
PMID: 24484967RESULTDouek M, Klaase J, Monypenny I, Kothari A, Zechmeister K, Brown D, Wyld L, Drew P, Garmo H, Agbaje O, Pankhurst Q, Anninga B, Grootendorst M, Ten Haken B, Hall-Craggs MA, Purushotham A, Pinder S; SentiMAG Trialists Group. Sentinel node biopsy using a magnetic tracer versus standard technique: the SentiMAG Multicentre Trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Apr;21(4):1237-45. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3379-6. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
PMID: 24322530RESULTGhilli M, Carretta E, Di Filippo F, Battaglia C, Fustaino L, Galanou I, Di Filippo S, Rucci P, Fantini MP, Roncella M. The superparamagnetic iron oxide tracer: a valid alternative in sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer treatment. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 Jul;26(4). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12385. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
PMID: 26365441RESULTRubio IT, Diaz-Botero S, Esgueva A, Rodriguez R, Cortadellas T, Cordoba O, Espinosa-Bravo M. The superparamagnetic iron oxide is equivalent to the Tc99 radiotracer method for identifying the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jan;41(1):46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.11.006. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
PMID: 25466980RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nik Hauser, PD Dr.
Kantonsspital Baden
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 18, 2015
First Posted
November 24, 2015
Study Start
February 1, 2016
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2016
Last Updated
November 24, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-11