Melanoma Image Analysis Algorithm (MIAA) Validation Study
Effectiveness of an Image Analysing Algorithm to Diagnose Melanoma Compared to Gold Standard Histological Determination
1 other identifier
interventional
514
1 country
7
Brief Summary
Prospective, single-arm, cross-sectional, study to establish the effectiveness of MIAA to detect melanoma in pigmented lesions, compared to gold standard histological determination.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 18, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 23, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 11, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 11, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 11, 2018
CompletedJanuary 25, 2019
January 1, 2019
1.5 years
November 18, 2015
January 24, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Area Under the Curve of a Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC) curve of MIAA result, using a maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) from all of the available images of biopsied lesions, compared to the biopsy result
Compare the MIAA result with the biopsy result
Study completion, on average 2 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (31)
The sensitivity of MIAA, using a MLE from all of the available images of biopsied lesions, compared to the biopsy result
Study completion, on average 2 weeks
The sensitivity of MIAA, using a MLE from all of the available images of non-biopsied lesions, compared to clinical assessment
Study completion, on average 2 weeks
The specificity of MIAA, using a MLE from all of the available images of biopsied lesions, compared to the biopsy result
Study completion, on average 2 weeks
The specificity of MIAA, using a MLE from all of the available images of non-biopsied lesions, compared to clinical assessment
Study completion, on average 2 weeks
The positive predictive value of MIAA, using a MLE from all of the available images of biopsied lesions, compared to the biopsy result
Study completion, on average 2 weeks
- +26 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (4)
Impact of patient characteristics on the AUROC assessment of MIAA
Study completion, on average 2 weeks
Impact of the image variables on the AUROC assessment of MIAA
Study completion, on average 2 weeks
Impact of the assessing clinician's level of experience on the AUROC assessment of MIAA
Study completion, on average 2 weeks
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
All patients
EXPERIMENTALEach patient will have any pigmented lesions (PLs) which are due to be biopsied, two PLs not due for biopsy and one patch of healthy skin photographed. Each will be photographed using three cameras: A standard DSLR and two smartphones with a dermoscopic lens attachment. Photographic images will be analysed by Melanoma Image Analysis Algorithm (MIAA)
Interventions
The images will be analysed by MIAA (Melanoma Image Analysis Algorithm). The MIAA result for PLs that are biopsied will be compared to the diagnosis made from the biopsy. The MIAA result for PLs not biopsied will be compared to clinician diagnosis.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study,
- Male or Female, aged 18 years or above,
- Have at least 1 lesion suitable for photographing that is scheduled for biopsy to determine the presence of melanoma,
- In the Investigators opinion, able and willing to comply with all study requirements.
You may not qualify if:
- Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study, or the participant's ability to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (7)
Royal Devon and Exeter
Exeter, Devon, EX2 5DW, United Kingdom
Whipps Corss Hospital
Leytonstone, London, E11 1NR, United Kingdom
Royal Stoke University Hospital
Stoke, Staffordshire, ST4 6QG, United Kingdom
Russells Hall Hospital
Dudley, West Midlands, DY1 2HQ, United Kingdom
Bristol Royal Infirmary
Bristol, BS2 8AE, United Kingdom
Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust
London, NW3 2QG, United Kingdom
Churchill Hospital
Oxford, OX3 7LE, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ioulios Palamaras, MD PhD
Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 18, 2015
First Posted
November 23, 2015
Study Start
January 11, 2017
Primary Completion
July 11, 2018
Study Completion
July 11, 2018
Last Updated
January 25, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-01