Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy With or Without Concurrent Chemotherapy for Stage II Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
1 other identifier
interventional
462
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A prior phase III randomized trial showed considerable survival benefit from the combined treatment of cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2DCRT) for patients with stage II (the Chinese 1992 staging system) nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, since intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was known to be superior to 2DCRT in local control, progression free survival and even overall survival, it is a pivotal question whether stage II \[T1N1M0 and T2N0-1M0, based on the 2010 International Union against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC/AJCC) staging system\] patients can still obtain significant benefit from the additional concurrent chemotherapy in the IMRT era. The investigators' retrospective study (PMID:26528755 ) indicated that low risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma (T1N1M0, T2N0-1M0 or T3N0M0, the 2010 UICC/AJCC staging system) patients who underwent IMRT could not benefit from cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy. Therefore, the investigators perform this randomized controlled trial to address this question, on a prudent assumption that IMRT alone was not inferior to IMRT plus concurrent chemotherapy in stage II patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Nov 2015
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 13, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 20, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2025
CompletedNovember 20, 2015
November 1, 2015
7 years
November 13, 2015
November 18, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Overall survival
Two year
Secondary Outcomes (5)
failure-free survival
two year
distant metastasis-free survival
two year
locoregional relapse-free survival
two year
Number of participants with treatment-related acute adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
two months
quality of life assessing by questionnaires
through study completion, an average of 5 year
Study Arms (2)
IMRT alone
EXPERIMENTALIntensity-modulated radiotherapy without cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy
IMRT plus concurrent chemotherapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntensity-modulated radiotherapy with cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy
Interventions
Cisplatin 100 mg/m² every 3 weeks for 3 cycles during radiotherapy.
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Newly histologically confirmed non-keratinizing (WHO 1991) nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
- Tumor staged as T1N1M0 or T2N0-1M0 (the 2010 UICC/AJCC staging system).
- Karnofsky scale (KPS) ≥ 70.
- Adequate marrow: leucocyte count ≥ 4×10E9/L, hemoglobin ≥ 110g/L and platelet count ≥ 100×10E9/L.
- Normal liver function test: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) and bilirubin ≤ 1.5×upper limit of normal (ULN) concomitant with alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≤ 2.5×ULN.
- Adequate renal function: creatinine clearance ≥ 60 ml/min or creatinine ≤ 1.5×ULN.
- Patients must give written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Prior malignancy, except adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer.
- Pregnancy or lactation (consider pregnancy test in women of child-bearing age and emphasize effective contraception during the treatment period).
- History of previous radiotherapy (except for non-melanomatous skin cancers outside intended radiotherapy volume).
- Prior radiotherapy, chemotherapy or surgery (except diagnostic) to primary tumor or nodes.
- Any severe intercurrent disease, which may bring unacceptable risk or affect the compliance of the trial, for example, unstable cardiac disease requiring treatment, renal disease, chronic hepatitis, diabetes with poor control (fasting plasma glucose \> 1.5×ULN), and emotional disturbance.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, China
Related Publications (6)
Zhang LN, Gao YH, Lan XW, Tang J, Su Z, Ma J, Deng W, OuYang PY, Xie FY. Propensity score matching analysis of cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy in low risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era. Oncotarget. 2015 Dec 22;6(41):44019-29. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5806.
PMID: 26528755BACKGROUNDSu Z, Mao YP, Tang J, Lan XW, OuYang PY, Xie FY. Long-term outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with IMRT: a retrospective study. Tumour Biol. 2016 Apr;37(4):4429-38. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-4266-5. Epub 2015 Oct 25.
PMID: 26499947BACKGROUNDChen QY, Wen YF, Guo L, Liu H, Huang PY, Mo HY, Li NW, Xiang YQ, Luo DH, Qiu F, Sun R, Deng MQ, Chen MY, Hua YJ, Guo X, Cao KJ, Hong MH, Qian CN, Mai HQ. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs radiotherapy alone in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma: phase III randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Dec 7;103(23):1761-70. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr432. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
PMID: 22056739BACKGROUNDLai SZ, Li WF, Chen L, Luo W, Chen YY, Liu LZ, Sun Y, Lin AH, Liu MZ, Ma J. How does intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy influence the treatment results in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Jul 1;80(3):661-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.03.024. Epub 2010 Jul 17.
PMID: 20643517BACKGROUNDZhang MX, Li J, Shen GP, Zou X, Xu JJ, Jiang R, You R, Hua YJ, Sun Y, Ma J, Hong MH, Chen MY. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy prolongs the survival of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma compared with conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy: A 10-year experience with a large cohort and long follow-up. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Nov;51(17):2587-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
PMID: 26318726BACKGROUNDPeng G, Wang T, Yang KY, Zhang S, Zhang T, Li Q, Han J, Wu G. A prospective, randomized study comparing outcomes and toxicities of intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiother Oncol. 2012 Sep;104(3):286-93. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.08.013. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
PMID: 22995588BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Fang-Yun Xie, M.D.
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center,Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 13, 2015
First Posted
November 20, 2015
Study Start
November 1, 2015
Primary Completion
November 1, 2022
Study Completion
November 1, 2025
Last Updated
November 20, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-11