Effect of Community Pharmacist Intervention on Adherence to Long-Term Medications
ECO-PHIL
1 other identifier
interventional
1,091
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The 4-arm factorial design RCT tested the impact of a behavioral intervention (SBI or BI), a reminder device (Pillbox), and the combination of the two on adherence in adult patients who filled a prescription for oral medications to treat diabetes or hyperlipidemia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 5, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 16, 2015
CompletedNovember 16, 2015
November 1, 2015
2.1 years
November 5, 2015
November 11, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in medication adherence using the PDC metric, for adult patients with diabetes or hyperlipidemia.
Medication adherence was measured as a Proportion of Days Covered (PDC) by calculating (at the patient level) the denominator as the number of days between the first fill of the medication during a measurement period and the end of the measurement period and the numerator is calculated as the number of days covered by prescription fill date and days of supply. For each patient, the PDC was calculated at baseline and 9-months. The baseline PDC was compared to that at 9-months.
At baseline and nine-months post-enrollment into the study.
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Change in triglyerceride levels from baseline to 6- and 9-months.
At baseline, six months and nine-months post-enrollment into the study.
Change in cholesterol levels from baseline to 6- and 9-months.
At baseline, six months and nine-months post-enrollment into the study.
Change in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels from baseline to 6- and 9-months.
At baseline, six months and nine-months post-enrollment into the study.
Change in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels from baseline to 6- and 9-months.
At baseline, six months and nine-months post-enrollment into the study.
Change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels from baseline to 6- and 9-months.
At baseline, six months and nine-months post-enrollment into the study.
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Screening and Brief Intervention (BI)
EXPERIMENTALScreening and Brief Intervention (BI) at initial prescription fill and at each additional refill.
Pill Box (PB)
EXPERIMENTALPill Box (PB) and information about their medications at the initial fill and at each additional refill.
Brief Intervention + Pill Box (BI+PB)
EXPERIMENTALScreening and Brief Intervention (BI) and Pill Box (PB) at initial prescription fill and at each additional refill.
Standard Care (SC)
NO INTERVENTIONThe Standard Care (SC) arm administered traditional dispensing and counseling by Rite Aid® pharmacists.
Interventions
Rite Aid® pharmacists screened patients at the time of the initial fill with the Adherence Estimator™ and using the screening results, provided the behavioral intervention, Brief Intervention using motivational interviewing principles based on POLAR\*S (BI). BI was considered an active intervention method.
Rite Aid® pharmacists provided patients with a Pill Box (PB) and information about their medications. However, pharmacists did not use motivational interviewing principles for engaging patients in direct interventions to modify behavior. PB was considered a passive intervention method.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients taking oral medications for diabetes or hyperlipidemia
- years of age
- Comfortable speaking in English
- Not institutionalized
- Not diagnosed with psychosis or dementia.
- Needed at least one prescription refill with the index medication picked up within 14 days of the index prescription fill
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Pittsburghlead
- Rite Aid Corp.collaborator
- RTI Internationalcollaborator
- Pharmacy Quality Alliancecollaborator
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Rite Aid® Corporation
Marietta, Georgia, 30060, United States
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15260, United States
Related Publications (10)
Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med. 2005 Aug 4;353(5):487-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra050100. No abstract available.
PMID: 16079372BACKGROUNDYeaw J, Benner JS, Walt JG, Sian S, Smith DB. Comparing adherence and persistence across 6 chronic medication classes. J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Nov-Dec;15(9):728-40. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.9.728.
PMID: 19954264BACKGROUNDVik SA, Hogan DB, Patten SB, Johnson JA, Romonko-Slack L, Maxwell CJ. Medication nonadherence and subsequent risk of hospitalisation and mortality among older adults. Drugs Aging. 2006;23(4):345-56. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200623040-00007.
PMID: 16732693BACKGROUNDTraynor K. Poor medication adherence remains a problem. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2012 Nov 1;69(21):1850. doi: 10.2146/news120074. No abstract available.
PMID: 23111664BACKGROUNDStefanacci RG, Guerin S. Why medication adherence matters to patients, payers, providers. Manag Care. 2013 Jan;22(1):37-9. No abstract available.
PMID: 23373139BACKGROUNDWilliams J, Steers WN, Ettner SL, Mangione CM, Duru OK. Cost-related nonadherence by medication type among Medicare Part D beneficiaries with diabetes. Med Care. 2013 Feb;51(2):193-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318270dc52.
PMID: 23032359BACKGROUNDHaynes RB, Ackloo E, Sahota N, McDonald HP, Yao X. Interventions for enhancing medication adherence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;(2):CD000011. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000011.pub3.
PMID: 18425859BACKGROUNDWilliams A, Manias E, Walker R. Interventions to improve medication adherence in people with multiple chronic conditions: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2008 Jul;63(2):132-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04656.x.
PMID: 18537843BACKGROUNDViswanathan M, Golin CE, Jones CD, Ashok M, Blalock S, Wines RC, Coker-Schwimmer EJ, Grodensky CA, Rosen DL, Yuen A, Sista P, Lohr KN. Closing the quality gap: revisiting the state of the science (vol. 4: medication adherence interventions: comparative effectiveness). Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2012 Sep;(208.4):1-685.
PMID: 24422970BACKGROUNDBabor TF, Kadden RM. Screening and interventions for alcohol and drug problems in medical settings: what works? J Trauma. 2005 Sep;59(3 Suppl):S80-7; discussion S94-100. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000174664.88603.21.
PMID: 16355071BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Janice L Pringle, PhD
University of Pittsburgh
- STUDY CHAIR
Newell McElwee, PharmD, MSPH
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 5, 2015
First Posted
November 16, 2015
Study Start
June 1, 2012
Primary Completion
July 1, 2014
Study Completion
July 1, 2014
Last Updated
November 16, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-11