Cost-utility Analysis of the AlloMap® Test
CUPIDON
2 other identifiers
interventional
197
1 country
13
Brief Summary
Transplant rejection is one of the most important complications of heart transplantation and requires a specific monitoring, including regular and invasive endomyocardial biopsies. The average hospital cost of a biopsy has been estimated at 3 297 dollars in United States. In France, the reimbursement rates by the Health Insurance for the corresponding stays vary from 682 to 25 865 euros, according to the finding of a rejection and its severity. AlloMap® is a non-invasive blood test that can identify patients with low probability of moderate to severe acute cell transplant rejection. The non-inferiority of the use of the AlloMap® test has been demonstrated in comparison of the usual care in terms of diagnosis of acute cellular rejection in a randomized study conducted in the United States. Following this study, the ISHLT (International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation) made recommendations advocating its use for these patients between 6 months and 5 years after heart transplantation. This new test could be an alternative to systematic biopsies usually performed to patients whose allograft function is stable, but it is very expensive since the analysis of a blood sample cost 2 000 euros pre-tax in France. This cost has to be compared with the current patient care. By replacing biopsies performed systematically, the test should reduce the costs of full and day hospitalizations for the realization of biopsies but also the costs associated with their possible complications. In addition, it can be expected that its use provides a benefit to the patient in terms of quality of life. Indeed, the achievement of a biopsy may cause significant stress and anxiety for the patient, due to discomfort, pain and potential complications that may be severe. To this day, no medico-economic assessment has been conducted to prove the interest of the use of AlloMap® compared to systematic realization of endomyocardial biopsies. The purpose of the CUPIDON study is to assess the effectiveness of the use of the AlloMap® test for monitoring heart transplant patients in the context of usual care and in accordance with international recommendations. AlloMap® will be used and compared to the current surveillance strategy by endomyocardial biopsies from 6 months to 36 months after heart transplantation. The investigators hypothesize that the use of this test for the diagnosis of acute cellular transplant rejection would avoid the costs of a large number of biopsies, while increasing the quality of life of patients related to their health.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
13 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 9, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 11, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 28, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 28, 2022
CompletedAugust 4, 2023
August 1, 2023
6.6 years
November 9, 2015
August 3, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) between systematic biopsies and use of the gene expression profiling blood test AlloMap® in monitoring of heart transplant patients for rejection
QALY will be measured using the EQ-5D quality of life questionnaire. The cost analysis will be conducted from the viewpoints of the French Health Insurance and the hospital, considering only hospital direct costs. All resource consumption, outside the AlloMap® test, will be commonly valued by standard costs.
36 months after heart transplantation
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Budget Impact analysis: estimation of the cost difference of the care of heart transplant patients before and after the introduction of the AlloMap® test
36 months after heart transplantation
Quality of life
At inclusion visit (5 months after heart transplantation)
Quality of life
At 12 months after heart transplantation
Quality of life
At 18 months after heart transplantation
Quality of life
At 24 months after heart transplantation
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Endomyocardial biopsy
ACTIVE COMPARATORSystematic endomyocardial biopsies performed according to a planned monitoring schedule in usual care for patients with a heart transplantation.
AlloMap® test
EXPERIMENTALNoninvasive gene expression profiling blood test (AlloMap®) performed instead of endomyocardial biopsies when planned in the monitoring schedule for patients with a heart transplantation.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years old
- Heart transplantation since 5 months (+/- 3 weeks)
- Stable allograft function :
- Left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 50% measured by echocardiography
- No sign of the presence of humoral rejection or DSA (donor-specific antibodies)
- Absence of biopsy-proven or treated acute cellular rejection in the previous 3 months
- Signed consent to participate in the study
- Patient affiliated to a social security scheme or similar
You may not qualify if:
- All symptoms or clinical signs of graft failure
- Treatment of a transplant rejection with ISHLT grade 2R or higher (proven by biopsy) during the previous 3 months
- Change of immunosuppressive molecule in the previous 30 days
- Treatment with hematopoietic growth factors in progress or during the previous 30 days
- Transfusion during the previous 30 days
- End-stage renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy (hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis)
- Major patient protected by law
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (13)
CHU, Hôpital du Haut Lévèque
Bordeaux, France
CHU, Hôpital Michallon
La Tronche, France
CHRU de Lille
Lille, France
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lyon, France
CHU, Hôpital La Timone
Marseille, France
CHU A. de Villeneuve
Montpellier, France
CHU, Hôpital Nord Laennec
Nantes, France
AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat
Paris, France
AP-HP, Hôpital La Pitié Salpêtrière
Paris, France
CHU de Rennes
Rennes, France
CHU, Hôpital Charles Nicolle
Rouen, France
CHRU de Strasbourg
Strasbourg, France
CHU, Hôpital Rangueil
Toulouse, France
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Laurent SEBBAG, MD
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 9, 2015
First Posted
November 11, 2015
Study Start
April 1, 2016
Primary Completion
October 28, 2022
Study Completion
October 28, 2022
Last Updated
August 4, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08