Comparison of Different Methods of Enamel Preparation Before Pit and Fissure Sealants
1 other identifier
interventional
400
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This study concerns the prevention of dental caries by sealing pits and fissures of permanent molars with a photopolymerizable resin. It must compare these three techniques Microdentisty (air abrasion, abrasion and sound using small cutters) usually used to prepare micro cavities in the enamel and / or the outer third of the dentin. These three commonly used techniques have never been compared by retaining as endpoint retention of sealant. These techniques are painless and do not require local anesthesia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2008
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 4, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 2, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedApril 25, 2016
September 1, 2015
5.5 years
June 4, 2013
April 22, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
observation of quality of treatment
Compare enamel preparation techniques of air abrasion and sound abrasion technique enameloplasty (pits and fissures extended to the dental bur) the more conventionally used to identify the most effective as using endpoint retention of material sealing of pits and fissures.
2 years
Study Arms (3)
dental bur versus air abrasion
OTHER1 tooth prepared with air abrasion versus one prepared tooth with dental bur
sono abrasion versus dental bur
OTHER1 tooth prepared with sono abrasion ans 1 tooth prepared with dental bur
air abrasion versus sono abrasion
OTHER1 tooth prepared with air abrasion versus 1 tooth prepared with sono abrasion
Interventions
already used intervention to prepare micro cavities of the dental to be treated by a photopolymerizable resin
already used intervention to prepare micro cavities of the dental to be treated by a photopolymerizable resin
already used intervention to prepare micro cavities of the dental to be treated by a photopolymerizable resin
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Affiliated with the Social Security
- Attendance at inspections
- Subject to high individual risk of caries
- Subjects with at least two pairs of molars and contralateral counterparts with the initial lesions of enamel (pits and fissures colored) or suspected of dentine caries (not highlighted by two clinical and radiographic examination usual)
You may not qualify if:
- Molar inaccessible, closed, sealed, or decayed (reaching the dentine
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
CHU
Nice, 06000, France
APHP
Paris, 75000, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 4, 2013
First Posted
November 2, 2015
Study Start
June 1, 2008
Primary Completion
December 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
April 25, 2016
Record last verified: 2015-09