An Integrated-Delivery-of-Care Approach to Improve Patient Outcomes, Safety, Well-Being After Orthopaedic Trauma
1 other identifier
interventional
88
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Orthopedic trauma is an unforeseen life-changing event. Nearly 2.8 million Americans sustain traumatic orthopedic injuries such as major fractures or amputation each year. Injury is treated in the hospital by physicians who medically stabilize and reconstruct the patient. Upon completion of their hospital stay, patients are discharged to begin their reintegration back into home and community activities. Despite high surgical success and survivorship rates, these injuries often result in poor quality of life (QOL)-related outcomes in otherwise healthy people. Fifty to ninety percent of patients develop severe psychological distress such as post-traumatic stress syndrome, depression or anxiety. Patients are often not provided the comprehensive support care and resources that are necessary to cope successfully with psychological stress and reintegrate into purposeful living. This is a major problem because high distress levels predict poor physical function, use of pain medications and low QOL. Survivors often cannot return to work, have persistent pain and experience social isolation. Distress worsens the self-perceptions of functional gain and efficacy and decreases personal fulfillment. Lingering psychological distress contributes to the development of other health problems and rebuilding of life is negatively impacted. The lack of psychosocial support contributes to injury re-occurrence, injury recidivism, re-hospitalizations and longer hospitalization stays, and higher personal and societal health care costs. There is currently a lack of comparative efficacy research to determine which delivery approach produces greater improvements in the outcomes that are most desired by patients, specifically, functional QOL and emotional well-being. The proposed research will directly compare these delivery-of-care approaches and measure the patient-reported outcomes that are considered important to patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 28, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 29, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 11, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 28, 2024
CompletedOctober 28, 2024
October 1, 2024
7 years
October 28, 2015
November 29, 2023
October 24, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline, at Weeks 2, 6 and 12 on the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Physical Function Between the Groups.
Survey questionnaire measures the perception of Physical Function. Physical Function Average: t score = 50±10 Min: 10 Max: 90 A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured. For positively-worded concepts like Physical Functional T-score of 60 is one SD better than average. By comparison, a Physical Function T-score of 40 is one SD worse than average.
Change from baseline at weeks 2, 6 and 12
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change From Baseline at Weeks 6 and 12 on the Lower Extremity Gain Scale (LEGS) Between the Groups.
Change from baseline at weeks 6 and 12
Change From Baseline at Weeks 2, 6 and 12 on the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11) Between the Groups.
Change from baseline at weeks 2, 6 and 12
Absolute Hand Grip Scores at Weeks 2, 6 and 12 on the Hand-held Hydraulic Dynamometer to Measure Handgrip Strength Between the Groups.
Absolute hand grip scores at weeks 2, 6 and 12
Study Arms (2)
Usual Care (UsCare)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group will receive UsCare for orthopedic trauma involves surgical intervention, acute care therapies, post-acute rehabilitation and follow-up clinic visits after discharge. Additionally, the following test will be performed: Lower Extremity Gain Scale (LEGS), dynamometer isometric handgrip strength, Active Range of Motion (AROM), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Beck Depression Inventory-II, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).
Integrated Care (ICare)
EXPERIMENTALThis group will receive ICare for orthopedic trauma involves surgical intervention, acute care therapies, post-acute rehabilitation and follow-up clinic visits after discharge, plus simultaneous psychosocial support via the Transform-10 Program.. Additionally, the following test will be performed: Lower Extremity Gain Scale (LEGS), dynamometer isometric handgrip strength, Active Range of Motion (AROM), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Beck Depression Inventory-II, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).
Interventions
The Integrated Care approach provides Usual Care processes plus simultaneous psychosocial support via the Transform-10 Program. The Transform-10 Program will include information regarding emotional well-being, social support, and provides opportunity for the patient to openly discuss their thoughts and concerns regarding their recovery. The patient's normal clinical care usually includes a hospital stay, a 2 week follow up, 6 week follow up, 12 week follow up, 6 month, and 1 year follow up visit.
Usual Care includes radiographic imaging and administration of pain medication and antibiotics, skin care and range of motion of the injured area. The patient's normal clinical care usually includes a hospital stay, a 2 week follow up, 6 week follow up, 12 week follow up, 6 month, and 1 year follow up visit. At the end of the study all of the materials that make up the Transform-10 Program will be provided.
Questionnaires of Physical Functional quality of life and Emotional Well-being will be performed during the hospital stay, a 2 week follow up, 6 week follow up, 12 week follow up, 6 month, and 1 year follow up visit.
LEGS consists of a 3-meter walk, putting on a sock, putting on a shoe, rising from an armless chair, stepping up and down stairs, getting on and off the toilet, reaching from a sitting position to an object on the ground. In people with traumatic fractures, LEGS has high internal consistency and the content, concurrent and construct validity are high. This assessment will be performed during the hospital stay, at the 2 week follow up, 6 week follow up, 12 week follow up, 6 month, and 1 year follow up visit.
Isometric handgrip strength will be measured using a hand-held hydraulic dynamometer. Handgrip strength is clinically important as it strongly predicts long-term function capability after orthopedic trauma. This assessment will be performed during the hospital stay, at the 2 week follow up, 6 week follow up, 12 week follow up, 6 month, and 1 year follow up visit.
The use of goniometer and a digital inclinometer will be used to assess AROM. This assessment will be performed during the hospital stay, at the 2 week follow up, 6 week follow up, 12 week follow up, 6 month, and 1 year follow up visit.
The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist will be administered to measure posttraumatic stress levels. This assessment will be performed during the hospital stay, at the 2 week follow up, 6 week follow up, 12 week follow up, 6 month, and 1 year follow up visit.
The Beck Depression Inventory-II is a broadly-applicable, clinically relevant psychometric instrument with high reliability and consistency which notes depression. This assessment will be performed during the hospital stay, at the 2 week follow up, 6 week follow up, 12 week follow up, 6 month, and 1 year follow up visit.
The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) will be used to measure state anxiety (anxiety about an event) and trait anxiety (anxiety level as a personal characteristic). This assessment will be performed during the hospital stay, at the 2 week follow up, 6 week follow up, 12 week follow up, 6 month, and 1 year follow up visit.
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11) will be used to assess pain-related fear in orthopaedic trauma. This assessment will be performed during the hospital stay, at the 2 week follow up, 6 week follow up, 12 week follow up, 6 month, and 1 year follow up visit.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients admitted with severe or multiple orthopedic trauma
- Patients who have received or will receive ≥1 surgical procedure for their orthopedic injuries
- Any major bone fractures that impairs mobility and/or participation in activities of daily living and self-care
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a traumatic brain injury
- Patients with the inability to communicate effectively (e.g., at a level where self-report measures could be answered completely; such as medicated state or mechanically ventilated)
- Patients currently using psychotropic medications
- Patients with psychotic, suicidal or homicidal ideations.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UF and Shands Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine Institute
Gainesville, Florida, 32611, United States
Related Publications (8)
Castillo RC, Wegener ST, Newell MZ, Carlini AR, Bradford AN, Heins SE, Wysocki E, Pollak AN, Teter H, Mackenzie EJ. Improving outcomes at Level I trauma centers: an early evaluation of the Trauma Survivors Network. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jun;74(6):1534-40. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182921606.
PMID: 23694884BACKGROUNDVincent HK, Horodyski M, Vincent KR, Brisbane ST, Sadasivan KK. Psychological Distress After Orthopedic Trauma: Prevalence in Patients and Implications for Rehabilitation. PM R. 2015 Sep;7(9):978-989. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
PMID: 25772720BACKGROUNDBecher S, Smith M, Ziran B. Orthopaedic trauma patients and depression: a prospective cohort. J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Oct;28(10):e242-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000128.
PMID: 24736695BACKGROUNDVranceanu AM, Bachoura A, Weening A, Vrahas M, Smith RM, Ring D. Psychological factors predict disability and pain intensity after skeletal trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Feb 5;96(3):e20. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00479.
PMID: 24500592BACKGROUNDHolbrook TL, Anderson JP, Sieber WJ, Browner D, Hoyt DB. Outcome after major trauma: 12-month and 18-month follow-up results from the Trauma Recovery Project. J Trauma. 1999 May;46(5):765-71; discussion 771-3. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199905000-00003.
PMID: 10338392BACKGROUNDCalder A, Badcoe A, Harms L. Broken bodies, healing spirits: road trauma survivor's perceptions of pastoral care during inpatient orthopaedic rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(15-16):1358-66. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.532280. Epub 2010 Nov 20.
PMID: 21091044BACKGROUNDPonzer S, Molin U, Johansson SE, Bergman B, Tornkvist H. Psychosocial support in rehabilitation after orthopedic injuries. J Trauma. 2000 Feb;48(2):273-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200002000-00013.
PMID: 10697086BACKGROUNDZdziarski-Horodyski L, Horodyski M, Sadasivan KK, Hagen J, Vasilopoulos T, Patrick M, Guenther R, Vincent HK. An integrated-delivery-of-care approach to improve patient reported physical function and mental wellbeing after orthopedic trauma: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018 Jan 11;19(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2430-5.
PMID: 29325583DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- MaryBeth Horodyski, EdD
- Organization
- University of Florida
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
MaryBeth Horodyski, Ph.D.
University of Florida Department of Orthopaedics
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 28, 2015
First Posted
October 29, 2015
Study Start
January 11, 2016
Primary Completion
January 1, 2023
Study Completion
January 1, 2023
Last Updated
October 28, 2024
Results First Posted
October 28, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10