NCT02591472

Brief Summary

Orthopedic trauma is an unforeseen life-changing event. Nearly 2.8 million Americans sustain traumatic orthopedic injuries such as major fractures or amputation each year. Injury is treated in the hospital by physicians who medically stabilize and reconstruct the patient. Upon completion of their hospital stay, patients are discharged to begin their reintegration back into home and community activities. Despite high surgical success and survivorship rates, these injuries often result in poor quality of life (QOL)-related outcomes in otherwise healthy people. Fifty to ninety percent of patients develop severe psychological distress such as post-traumatic stress syndrome, depression or anxiety. Patients are often not provided the comprehensive support care and resources that are necessary to cope successfully with psychological stress and reintegrate into purposeful living. This is a major problem because high distress levels predict poor physical function, use of pain medications and low QOL. Survivors often cannot return to work, have persistent pain and experience social isolation. Distress worsens the self-perceptions of functional gain and efficacy and decreases personal fulfillment. Lingering psychological distress contributes to the development of other health problems and rebuilding of life is negatively impacted. The lack of psychosocial support contributes to injury re-occurrence, injury recidivism, re-hospitalizations and longer hospitalization stays, and higher personal and societal health care costs. There is currently a lack of comparative efficacy research to determine which delivery approach produces greater improvements in the outcomes that are most desired by patients, specifically, functional QOL and emotional well-being. The proposed research will directly compare these delivery-of-care approaches and measure the patient-reported outcomes that are considered important to patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
88

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2016

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 28, 2015

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 29, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 11, 2016

Completed
7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2023

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 28, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

October 28, 2024

Status Verified

October 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

7 years

First QC Date

October 28, 2015

Results QC Date

November 29, 2023

Last Update Submit

October 24, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change From Baseline, at Weeks 2, 6 and 12 on the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Physical Function Between the Groups.

    Survey questionnaire measures the perception of Physical Function. Physical Function Average: t score = 50±10 Min: 10 Max: 90 A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured. For positively-worded concepts like Physical Functional T-score of 60 is one SD better than average. By comparison, a Physical Function T-score of 40 is one SD worse than average.

    Change from baseline at weeks 2, 6 and 12

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Change From Baseline at Weeks 6 and 12 on the Lower Extremity Gain Scale (LEGS) Between the Groups.

    Change from baseline at weeks 6 and 12

  • Change From Baseline at Weeks 2, 6 and 12 on the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11) Between the Groups.

    Change from baseline at weeks 2, 6 and 12

  • Absolute Hand Grip Scores at Weeks 2, 6 and 12 on the Hand-held Hydraulic Dynamometer to Measure Handgrip Strength Between the Groups.

    Absolute hand grip scores at weeks 2, 6 and 12

Study Arms (2)

Usual Care (UsCare)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This group will receive UsCare for orthopedic trauma involves surgical intervention, acute care therapies, post-acute rehabilitation and follow-up clinic visits after discharge. Additionally, the following test will be performed: Lower Extremity Gain Scale (LEGS), dynamometer isometric handgrip strength, Active Range of Motion (AROM), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Beck Depression Inventory-II, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).

Procedure: Usual Care (UsCare)Other: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information SystemOther: Lower Extremity Gain Scale (LEGS)Other: DynamometerOther: Active Range of Motion (AROM)Other: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)Other: Beck Depression Inventory-IIOther: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)Other: Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11)

Integrated Care (ICare)

EXPERIMENTAL

This group will receive ICare for orthopedic trauma involves surgical intervention, acute care therapies, post-acute rehabilitation and follow-up clinic visits after discharge, plus simultaneous psychosocial support via the Transform-10 Program.. Additionally, the following test will be performed: Lower Extremity Gain Scale (LEGS), dynamometer isometric handgrip strength, Active Range of Motion (AROM), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Beck Depression Inventory-II, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).

Procedure: Integrated care (ICare)Other: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information SystemOther: Lower Extremity Gain Scale (LEGS)Other: DynamometerOther: Active Range of Motion (AROM)Other: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)Other: Beck Depression Inventory-IIOther: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)Other: Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11)

Interventions

The Integrated Care approach provides Usual Care processes plus simultaneous psychosocial support via the Transform-10 Program. The Transform-10 Program will include information regarding emotional well-being, social support, and provides opportunity for the patient to openly discuss their thoughts and concerns regarding their recovery. The patient's normal clinical care usually includes a hospital stay, a 2 week follow up, 6 week follow up, 12 week follow up, 6 month, and 1 year follow up visit.

Also known as: ICare
Integrated Care (ICare)

Usual Care includes radiographic imaging and administration of pain medication and antibiotics, skin care and range of motion of the injured area. The patient's normal clinical care usually includes a hospital stay, a 2 week follow up, 6 week follow up, 12 week follow up, 6 month, and 1 year follow up visit. At the end of the study all of the materials that make up the Transform-10 Program will be provided.

Also known as: UsCare
Usual Care (UsCare)

Questionnaires of Physical Functional quality of life and Emotional Well-being will be performed during the hospital stay, a 2 week follow up, 6 week follow up, 12 week follow up, 6 month, and 1 year follow up visit.

Also known as: PROMIS
Integrated Care (ICare)Usual Care (UsCare)

LEGS consists of a 3-meter walk, putting on a sock, putting on a shoe, rising from an armless chair, stepping up and down stairs, getting on and off the toilet, reaching from a sitting position to an object on the ground. In people with traumatic fractures, LEGS has high internal consistency and the content, concurrent and construct validity are high. This assessment will be performed during the hospital stay, at the 2 week follow up, 6 week follow up, 12 week follow up, 6 month, and 1 year follow up visit.

Integrated Care (ICare)Usual Care (UsCare)

Isometric handgrip strength will be measured using a hand-held hydraulic dynamometer. Handgrip strength is clinically important as it strongly predicts long-term function capability after orthopedic trauma. This assessment will be performed during the hospital stay, at the 2 week follow up, 6 week follow up, 12 week follow up, 6 month, and 1 year follow up visit.

Also known as: Isometric handgrip strength
Integrated Care (ICare)Usual Care (UsCare)

The use of goniometer and a digital inclinometer will be used to assess AROM. This assessment will be performed during the hospital stay, at the 2 week follow up, 6 week follow up, 12 week follow up, 6 month, and 1 year follow up visit.

Integrated Care (ICare)Usual Care (UsCare)

The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist will be administered to measure posttraumatic stress levels. This assessment will be performed during the hospital stay, at the 2 week follow up, 6 week follow up, 12 week follow up, 6 month, and 1 year follow up visit.

Integrated Care (ICare)Usual Care (UsCare)

The Beck Depression Inventory-II is a broadly-applicable, clinically relevant psychometric instrument with high reliability and consistency which notes depression. This assessment will be performed during the hospital stay, at the 2 week follow up, 6 week follow up, 12 week follow up, 6 month, and 1 year follow up visit.

Also known as: BDI-II
Integrated Care (ICare)Usual Care (UsCare)

The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) will be used to measure state anxiety (anxiety about an event) and trait anxiety (anxiety level as a personal characteristic). This assessment will be performed during the hospital stay, at the 2 week follow up, 6 week follow up, 12 week follow up, 6 month, and 1 year follow up visit.

Integrated Care (ICare)Usual Care (UsCare)

Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11) will be used to assess pain-related fear in orthopaedic trauma. This assessment will be performed during the hospital stay, at the 2 week follow up, 6 week follow up, 12 week follow up, 6 month, and 1 year follow up visit.

Integrated Care (ICare)Usual Care (UsCare)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients admitted with severe or multiple orthopedic trauma
  • Patients who have received or will receive ≥1 surgical procedure for their orthopedic injuries
  • Any major bone fractures that impairs mobility and/or participation in activities of daily living and self-care

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with a traumatic brain injury
  • Patients with the inability to communicate effectively (e.g., at a level where self-report measures could be answered completely; such as medicated state or mechanically ventilated)
  • Patients currently using psychotropic medications
  • Patients with psychotic, suicidal or homicidal ideations.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

UF and Shands Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine Institute

Gainesville, Florida, 32611, United States

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Castillo RC, Wegener ST, Newell MZ, Carlini AR, Bradford AN, Heins SE, Wysocki E, Pollak AN, Teter H, Mackenzie EJ. Improving outcomes at Level I trauma centers: an early evaluation of the Trauma Survivors Network. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jun;74(6):1534-40. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182921606.

    PMID: 23694884BACKGROUND
  • Vincent HK, Horodyski M, Vincent KR, Brisbane ST, Sadasivan KK. Psychological Distress After Orthopedic Trauma: Prevalence in Patients and Implications for Rehabilitation. PM R. 2015 Sep;7(9):978-989. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Mar 12.

    PMID: 25772720BACKGROUND
  • Becher S, Smith M, Ziran B. Orthopaedic trauma patients and depression: a prospective cohort. J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Oct;28(10):e242-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000128.

    PMID: 24736695BACKGROUND
  • Vranceanu AM, Bachoura A, Weening A, Vrahas M, Smith RM, Ring D. Psychological factors predict disability and pain intensity after skeletal trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Feb 5;96(3):e20. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00479.

    PMID: 24500592BACKGROUND
  • Holbrook TL, Anderson JP, Sieber WJ, Browner D, Hoyt DB. Outcome after major trauma: 12-month and 18-month follow-up results from the Trauma Recovery Project. J Trauma. 1999 May;46(5):765-71; discussion 771-3. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199905000-00003.

    PMID: 10338392BACKGROUND
  • Calder A, Badcoe A, Harms L. Broken bodies, healing spirits: road trauma survivor's perceptions of pastoral care during inpatient orthopaedic rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(15-16):1358-66. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.532280. Epub 2010 Nov 20.

    PMID: 21091044BACKGROUND
  • Ponzer S, Molin U, Johansson SE, Bergman B, Tornkvist H. Psychosocial support in rehabilitation after orthopedic injuries. J Trauma. 2000 Feb;48(2):273-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200002000-00013.

    PMID: 10697086BACKGROUND
  • Zdziarski-Horodyski L, Horodyski M, Sadasivan KK, Hagen J, Vasilopoulos T, Patrick M, Guenther R, Vincent HK. An integrated-delivery-of-care approach to improve patient reported physical function and mental wellbeing after orthopedic trauma: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018 Jan 11;19(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2430-5.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedMuscle Strength Dynamometer

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Delivery of Health CarePatient Care ManagementHealth Services AdministrationHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationDiagnostic EquipmentEquipment and Supplies

Results Point of Contact

Title
MaryBeth Horodyski, EdD
Organization
University of Florida

Study Officials

  • MaryBeth Horodyski, Ph.D.

    University of Florida Department of Orthopaedics

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2015

First Posted

October 29, 2015

Study Start

January 11, 2016

Primary Completion

January 1, 2023

Study Completion

January 1, 2023

Last Updated

October 28, 2024

Results First Posted

October 28, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-10

Locations