NCT05315726

Brief Summary

Several studies have recently tested the use of muscle vibration for the rehabilitation of patients after a stroke. When applied in a repeated and focused manner, this vibration appears to promote the recovery of functional capacities through the mechanisms of neuromuscular plasticity. These results are encouraging, showing in particular a significant decrease in spasticity in post-stroke patients in the chronic phase (\> 6 months after stroke), on the upper and/or lower limbs. However, very few studies have been done on this type of early intervention. Muscle vibration may therefore be an innovative therapy to complement the care that is currently offered in the acute and subacute phase of post-stroke rehabilitation. Moreover, brain plasticity after a stroke is particularly high in the 3 months after the accident, but the vast majority of studies having evaluated the impact of vibration in a chronic phase (\> 12 months post-stroke). It is likely, however, that the influence of vibration, particularly on brain plasticity, is increased in the acute or subacute phase (first 6 months). To date, the effect of vibration on spinal cord or cortical plasticity has not been quantified in the acute or subacute phase. This is why the second part of this project (phase 2) aims to systematically evaluate and quantify the neuroplastic and functional effects of post-stroke vibration in the early phase. Phase 1 - Validation of a method for measuring spasticity (upper limb) with an isokinetic dynamometer 32 patients with ischemic and/or hemorrhagic stroke (\> 3 months after stroke) Phase 2 - Use of this objective technique to measure the effect of a muscle vibration protocol to limit the onset of spasticity in a population of 100 patients following a stroke, in the acute or subacute phase (\< 6 weeks post-stroke) in a randomized trial:

  • intervention group: usual rehabilitation + muscle vibrations
  • control group: usual rehabilitation + placebo vibrations

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
165

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
14mo left

Started Jun 2022

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress77%
Jun 2022Jul 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 30, 2022

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 7, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 14, 2022

Completed
5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2027

Last Updated

February 9, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

5 years

First QC Date

March 30, 2022

Last Update Submit

February 5, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Phase 1: Joint angle (elbow or wrist of the limb contralateral to the brain injury)

    Joint angle (elbow or wrist of the limb contralateral to the brain injury) at the onset of a spastic contraction (maximum intensity of resistance to mobilization) recorded by isokinetic dynamometer on a wheelchair during the initial visit

    at baseline

  • Phase 2: Scoring wrist flexor muscle spasticity

    Scoring of wrist flexor muscle spasticity by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), at the beginning of the study and at 6 weeks (end of intervention).

    at 6 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (22)

  • Sensorimotor function modifications of the paretic upper limb

    at 0, 6 weeks and 6 months

  • Sensorimotor function modifications of the paretic upper limb

    at 0, 6 weeks and 6 months

  • Sensorimotor function modifications of the paretic upper limb

    at 0, 6 weeks and 6 months

  • Spasticity of the paretic limb at the wrist

    at 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months

  • Spasticity of the paretic limb at the wrist

    at 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months

  • +17 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Phase 1

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: DynamometerOther: Muscle vibrations

Phase 2: Intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: Muscle vibrations

Phase 2: control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Other: Placebo muscle vibration

Interventions

Measurement of elbow/wrist spasticity

Phase 1

1 session of 10 minutes

Phase 1

3 times/week for 6 weeks

Phase 2: control group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Phase 1:
  • Adult patient,
  • Medically stable on medical assessment, with no contraindications to stroke rehabilitation management management (no medical problems or acute intercurrent medical events),
  • Have had an ischemic and/or hemorrhagic stroke (\> 3 months post-stroke), impacting the motor skills of the upper limbs,
  • ≤ MAS \< 4 on elbow or wrist flexors,
  • Having given oral consent.
  • Phase 2:
  • Adult patient \> 18 years old,
  • Able to follow a rehabilitation program on medical opinion (no medical issues or acute intercurrent medical events),
  • First stroke ever \< 6 weeks, confirmed by imaging,
  • Hemiparesis or hemiplegia of the upper limb (FMA-UE score \< 48), particularly in the wrist and elbow flexors,
  • Requiring inpatient or outpatient hospitalization in a rehabilitation center,
  • Having given oral consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Phases 1 and 2:
  • Significant pain on mobilization of the wrist or elbow (VAS \> 5/10),
  • Presence of other neurological, muscular or osteoarticular conditions altering upper limb function,
  • Significant cognitive impairments: inability to understand simple instructions or give consent of any kind (not included if: LAST scores \< 5/7 in comprehension, and if YES/NO answers are unreliable),
  • Not covered by national health insurance,
  • Being pregnant or breastfeeding,
  • Being under guardianship or curatorship.
  • Person subject to a measure of legal protection

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

SSR Marguerite BOUCICAUT

Chalon-sur-Saône, 71100, France

RECRUITING

Chu Dijon Bourgogne

Dijon, 21000, France

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Julliand S, Papaxanthis C, Delphin C, Mock A, Raumel MA, Gueugnon M, Ornetti P, Laroche D. IMPROVE study protocol, investigating post-stroke local muscle vibrations to promote cerebral plasticity and functional recovery: a single-blind randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 15;14(3):e079918. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079918.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome

Interventions

Muscle Strength Dynamometer

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Organizing PneumoniaBronchiolitis ObliteransBronchiolitisBronchitisBronchial DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesLung Diseases, ObstructiveLung DiseasesGraft vs Host DiseaseImmune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diagnostic EquipmentEquipment and Supplies

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2022

First Posted

April 7, 2022

Study Start

June 14, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Last Updated

February 9, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The study team policy is about to share and collaborate with other research teams upon reasonable request for access to study data. Expressions of interest in access to study data, addressed to the corresponding author, will be considered and data de-identified at group or individual level may be shared as appropriate. A data transfer agreement will then be drawn up. The study dataset will be available at the end of the study, once the database is frozen. Sharing the database will be made available between interested parts with a data sharing agreement contract.

Shared Documents
ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
after publication of the lead article

Locations