The Effects of Muscle Vibration on the Development of Spasticity and Neuroplasticity in a Post-stroke Population
SPACE-TIC
1 other identifier
interventional
165
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Several studies have recently tested the use of muscle vibration for the rehabilitation of patients after a stroke. When applied in a repeated and focused manner, this vibration appears to promote the recovery of functional capacities through the mechanisms of neuromuscular plasticity. These results are encouraging, showing in particular a significant decrease in spasticity in post-stroke patients in the chronic phase (\> 6 months after stroke), on the upper and/or lower limbs. However, very few studies have been done on this type of early intervention. Muscle vibration may therefore be an innovative therapy to complement the care that is currently offered in the acute and subacute phase of post-stroke rehabilitation. Moreover, brain plasticity after a stroke is particularly high in the 3 months after the accident, but the vast majority of studies having evaluated the impact of vibration in a chronic phase (\> 12 months post-stroke). It is likely, however, that the influence of vibration, particularly on brain plasticity, is increased in the acute or subacute phase (first 6 months). To date, the effect of vibration on spinal cord or cortical plasticity has not been quantified in the acute or subacute phase. This is why the second part of this project (phase 2) aims to systematically evaluate and quantify the neuroplastic and functional effects of post-stroke vibration in the early phase. Phase 1 - Validation of a method for measuring spasticity (upper limb) with an isokinetic dynamometer 32 patients with ischemic and/or hemorrhagic stroke (\> 3 months after stroke) Phase 2 - Use of this objective technique to measure the effect of a muscle vibration protocol to limit the onset of spasticity in a population of 100 patients following a stroke, in the acute or subacute phase (\< 6 weeks post-stroke) in a randomized trial:
- intervention group: usual rehabilitation + muscle vibrations
- control group: usual rehabilitation + placebo vibrations
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 30, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 7, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 14, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2027
February 9, 2026
February 1, 2026
5 years
March 30, 2022
February 5, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Phase 1: Joint angle (elbow or wrist of the limb contralateral to the brain injury)
Joint angle (elbow or wrist of the limb contralateral to the brain injury) at the onset of a spastic contraction (maximum intensity of resistance to mobilization) recorded by isokinetic dynamometer on a wheelchair during the initial visit
at baseline
Phase 2: Scoring wrist flexor muscle spasticity
Scoring of wrist flexor muscle spasticity by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), at the beginning of the study and at 6 weeks (end of intervention).
at 6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (22)
Sensorimotor function modifications of the paretic upper limb
at 0, 6 weeks and 6 months
Sensorimotor function modifications of the paretic upper limb
at 0, 6 weeks and 6 months
Sensorimotor function modifications of the paretic upper limb
at 0, 6 weeks and 6 months
Spasticity of the paretic limb at the wrist
at 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months
Spasticity of the paretic limb at the wrist
at 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months
- +17 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Phase 1
EXPERIMENTALPhase 2: Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALPhase 2: control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Phase 1:
- Adult patient,
- Medically stable on medical assessment, with no contraindications to stroke rehabilitation management management (no medical problems or acute intercurrent medical events),
- Have had an ischemic and/or hemorrhagic stroke (\> 3 months post-stroke), impacting the motor skills of the upper limbs,
- ≤ MAS \< 4 on elbow or wrist flexors,
- Having given oral consent.
- Phase 2:
- Adult patient \> 18 years old,
- Able to follow a rehabilitation program on medical opinion (no medical issues or acute intercurrent medical events),
- First stroke ever \< 6 weeks, confirmed by imaging,
- Hemiparesis or hemiplegia of the upper limb (FMA-UE score \< 48), particularly in the wrist and elbow flexors,
- Requiring inpatient or outpatient hospitalization in a rehabilitation center,
- Having given oral consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Phases 1 and 2:
- Significant pain on mobilization of the wrist or elbow (VAS \> 5/10),
- Presence of other neurological, muscular or osteoarticular conditions altering upper limb function,
- Significant cognitive impairments: inability to understand simple instructions or give consent of any kind (not included if: LAST scores \< 5/7 in comprehension, and if YES/NO answers are unreliable),
- Not covered by national health insurance,
- Being pregnant or breastfeeding,
- Being under guardianship or curatorship.
- Person subject to a measure of legal protection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
SSR Marguerite BOUCICAUT
Chalon-sur-Saône, 71100, France
Chu Dijon Bourgogne
Dijon, 21000, France
Related Publications (1)
Julliand S, Papaxanthis C, Delphin C, Mock A, Raumel MA, Gueugnon M, Ornetti P, Laroche D. IMPROVE study protocol, investigating post-stroke local muscle vibrations to promote cerebral plasticity and functional recovery: a single-blind randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 15;14(3):e079918. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079918.
PMID: 38490651DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 30, 2022
First Posted
April 7, 2022
Study Start
June 14, 2022
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2027
Last Updated
February 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- after publication of the lead article
The study team policy is about to share and collaborate with other research teams upon reasonable request for access to study data. Expressions of interest in access to study data, addressed to the corresponding author, will be considered and data de-identified at group or individual level may be shared as appropriate. A data transfer agreement will then be drawn up. The study dataset will be available at the end of the study, once the database is frozen. Sharing the database will be made available between interested parts with a data sharing agreement contract.