NCT02590406

Brief Summary

The risk of complication associated with airway in obese patient is important. The result of pre-oxygenation gives the clinician a prolonged non-hypoxic apnea time. The relation between FRC and non-hypoxic apnea time has been correlated. However, the best condition to accomplish the pre-oxygenation in morbidly obese patient has yet to be described in the medical literature. A study previously done in our hospital (EPO2-PV) compared the effect of different positions and ventilation modes on the FRC in the laboratory. A significant difference has been established on the FRC between the inverse Trendelenburg position with positive pressure ventilation and the head up ("beach-chair") position without positive pressure. The current study, EPO2-A is designed to compared the two positions and ventilation modes during the induction of general anesthesia on morbidly obese and correlate the difference in FRC to difference in apnea time.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2015

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2015

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 6, 2015

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 29, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2016

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 18, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

March 25, 2020

Status Verified

March 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

October 6, 2015

Results QC Date

January 10, 2017

Last Update Submit

March 23, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Morbid ObesityBariatric SurgeryPre-OxygenationAnesthesia InductionPositive pressure ventilationNon hypoxic apnea timePositive-Pressure RespirationAnesthesia, General

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Non Hypoxic Apnea Time

    Change of Non-hypoxic apnea time in obese patient during a General Anesthesia induction, as a result of different pre-oxygenation position and ventilation mode; 1-Beach Chair and No positive pressure ventilation, 2-Reverse Trendelenburg and positive pressure ventilation and PEEP. End of measure time frame is 5 minutes after intubation

    After a 3 minutes pre-oxygenation period

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Time to Expired Oxygen Fraction > 0,9

    During the pre-oxygenation period

  • Maximum Expired Fraction of Oxygen Obtained

    After 3 minutes of pre-oxygenation

  • Minimum Arterial Saturation of Oxygen Obtained

    After the end of the Non-hypoxic apnea time

  • Time to 97% Saturation

    Evaluation of the time needed to the beginning of the ventilation to the moment where the saturation is 97%

  • Hemodynamic Changes

    From the beginning of the pre-oxygenation to the end of the protocol

Study Arms (2)

Beach chair (BC) and ZEEP

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Table Position: Beach chair, Inclination of the upper part of the table at 25 degrees, breaking at the patient's hips ZEEP: 3 minutes pre-oxygenation with tidal volumes, FiO2 100%, mouth piece used as a ventilatory interface

Procedure: Beach chair (BC) and ZEEP

Reverse Trendelenburg and NIPPV

EXPERIMENTAL

Table Position: Reverse Trendelenburg, Inclination of the whole table at 25 degrees from an horizontal plane, head up. NIPPV: 3 minutes of pre-oxygenation with 8 cm H2O positive pressure and 10 cm H2O PEEP. Trigger set at 1,5 L/min, mouth piece is used as a ventilatory interface

Procedure: Reverse Trendelenburg and NIPPV

Interventions

Table Position: Beach chair, Inclination of the upper part of the table at 25 degrees, breaking at the patient's hips ZEEP: 3 minutes pre-oxygenation with tidal volumes, FiO2 100%, mouth piece used as a ventilatory interface

Beach chair (BC) and ZEEP

Table Position: Reverse Trendelenburg, Inclination of the whole table at 25 degrees from an horizontal plane, head up. NIPPV: 3 minutes of pre-oxygenation with 8 cm H2O positive pressure and 10 cm H2O PEEP. Trigger set at 1,5 L/min, mouth piece is used as a ventilatory interface

Reverse Trendelenburg and NIPPV

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • BMI \> 40
  • Abdominal obesity : waist circumference: \> 115 for the women waist circumference \> 130 for the men

You may not qualify if:

  • Facial hair
  • Cranio-facial abnormality
  • Asthma (continuous treatment)
  • COPD (FEV1 \< 80%)
  • Severe cardiovascular disease (NYHA \> 3)
  • Pregnancy
  • Tobacco use
  • Know or suspected difficulty with intubation
  • Severe GERD or risk of aspiration

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec

Québec, Quebec, G1V4G5, Canada

Location

Related Publications (21)

  • Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C; Fourth National Audit Project. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2011 May;106(5):617-31. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer058. Epub 2011 Mar 29.

    PMID: 21447488BACKGROUND
  • Juvin P, Lavaut E, Dupont H, Lefevre P, Demetriou M, Dumoulin JL, Desmonts JM. Difficult tracheal intubation is more common in obese than in lean patients. Anesth Analg. 2003 Aug;97(2):595-600. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000072547.75928.B0.

    PMID: 12873960BACKGROUND
  • Langeron O, Masso E, Huraux C, Guggiari M, Bianchi A, Coriat P, Riou B. Prediction of difficult mask ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2000 May;92(5):1229-36. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200005000-00009.

    PMID: 10781266BACKGROUND
  • Tanoubi I, Drolet P, Donati F. Optimizing preoxygenation in adults. Can J Anaesth. 2009 Jun;56(6):449-66. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9084-z. Epub 2009 Apr 28.

    PMID: 19399574BACKGROUND
  • Gambee AM, Hertzka RE, Fisher DM. Preoxygenation techniques: comparison of three minutes and four breaths. Anesth Analg. 1987 May;66(5):468-70. No abstract available.

    PMID: 3578856BACKGROUND
  • Jense HG, Dubin SA, Silverstein PI, O'Leary-Escolas U. Effect of obesity on safe duration of apnea in anesthetized humans. Anesth Analg. 1991 Jan;72(1):89-93. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199101000-00016.

    PMID: 1984382BACKGROUND
  • Damia G, Mascheroni D, Croci M, Tarenzi L. Perioperative changes in functional residual capacity in morbidly obese patients. Br J Anaesth. 1988 Apr;60(5):574-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/60.5.574.

    PMID: 3377932BACKGROUND
  • Pelosi P, Croci M, Ravagnan I, Tredici S, Pedoto A, Lissoni A, Gattinoni L. The effects of body mass on lung volumes, respiratory mechanics, and gas exchange during general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1998 Sep;87(3):654-60. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199809000-00031.

    PMID: 9728848BACKGROUND
  • Altermatt FR, Munoz HR, Delfino AE, Cortinez LI. Pre-oxygenation in the obese patient: effects of position on tolerance to apnoea. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Nov;95(5):706-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei231. Epub 2005 Sep 2.

    PMID: 16143575BACKGROUND
  • Boyce JR, Ness T, Castroman P, Gleysteen JJ. A preliminary study of the optimal anesthesia positioning for the morbidly obese patient. Obes Surg. 2003 Feb;13(1):4-9. doi: 10.1381/096089203321136511.

    PMID: 12630606BACKGROUND
  • Lane S, Saunders D, Schofield A, Padmanabhan R, Hildreth A, Laws D. A prospective, randomised controlled trial comparing the efficacy of pre-oxygenation in the 20 degrees head-up vs supine position. Anaesthesia. 2005 Nov;60(11):1064-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04374.x.

    PMID: 16229689BACKGROUND
  • Collins JS, Lemmens HJ, Brodsky JB, Brock-Utne JG, Levitan RM. Laryngoscopy and morbid obesity: a comparison of the "sniff" and "ramped" positions. Obes Surg. 2004 Oct;14(9):1171-5. doi: 10.1381/0960892042386869.

    PMID: 15527629BACKGROUND
  • Levitan RM, Mechem CC, Ochroch EA, Shofer FS, Hollander JE. Head-elevated laryngoscopy position: improving laryngeal exposure during laryngoscopy by increasing head elevation. Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Mar;41(3):322-30. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.87.

    PMID: 12605198BACKGROUND
  • Coussa M, Proietti S, Schnyder P, Frascarolo P, Suter M, Spahn DR, Magnusson L. Prevention of atelectasis formation during the induction of general anesthesia in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2004 May;98(5):1491-5, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000111743.61132.99.

    PMID: 15105237BACKGROUND
  • Cressey DM, Berthoud MC, Reilly CS. Effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure to enhance pre-oxygenation in morbidly obese women. Anaesthesia. 2001 Jul;56(7):680-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01374-3.x.

    PMID: 11437771BACKGROUND
  • Gander S, Frascarolo P, Suter M, Spahn DR, Magnusson L. Positive end-expiratory pressure during induction of general anesthesia increases duration of nonhypoxic apnea in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2005 Feb;100(2):580-584. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000143339.40385.1B.

    PMID: 15673897BACKGROUND
  • Delay JM, Sebbane M, Jung B, Nocca D, Verzilli D, Pouzeratte Y, Kamel ME, Fabre JM, Eledjam JJ, Jaber S. The effectiveness of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation to enhance preoxygenation in morbidly obese patients: a randomized controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2008 Nov;107(5):1707-13. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318183909b.

    PMID: 18931236BACKGROUND
  • Baraka AS, Hanna MT, Jabbour SI, Nawfal MF, Sibai AA, Yazbeck VG, Khoury NI, Karam KS. Preoxygenation of pregnant and nonpregnant women in the head-up versus supine position. Anesth Analg. 1992 Nov;75(5):757-9. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199211000-00018.

    PMID: 1416130BACKGROUND
  • Lellouche F, Dionne S, Simard S, Bussieres J, Dagenais F. High tidal volumes in mechanically ventilated patients increase organ dysfunction after cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2012 May;116(5):1072-82. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182522df5.

    PMID: 22450472BACKGROUND
  • Dixon BJ, Dixon JB, Carden JR, Burn AJ, Schachter LM, Playfair JM, Laurie CP, O'Brien PE. Preoxygenation is more effective in the 25 degrees head-up position than in the supine position in severely obese patients: a randomized controlled study. Anesthesiology. 2005 Jun;102(6):1110-5; discussion 5A. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200506000-00009.

  • Couture EJ, Carrier-Boucher A, Provencher S, Tanoubi I, Marceau S, Bussieres JS. Effect of reverse Trendelenburg position and positive pressure ventilation on safe non-hypoxic apnea period in obese, a randomized-control trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Jun 8;23(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02128-7.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Obesity, Morbid

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ObesityOverweightOvernutritionNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesBody WeightSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Limitations and Caveats

The main limitation of this study is that we did not compare the position and ventilation mode separately. The reason why we decided to do it as a bundle of interventions was that we wanted to minimize the number of patients exposed to the protocol.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr Jean S Bussières
Organization
Institut universitaire Cardiologie et Pneumologie de Québec

Study Officials

  • Antony Carrier-Boucher, MD

    Laval University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Bussières S Jean, MD

    Laval University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 6, 2015

First Posted

October 29, 2015

Study Start

September 1, 2015

Primary Completion

January 1, 2016

Study Completion

March 1, 2016

Last Updated

March 25, 2020

Results First Posted

March 18, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-03

Locations