Overall Performance of a 1-day Silicone Hydrogel Lens When Habitual Soft Lens Wearers Are Refit
1 other identifier
interventional
103
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The objective of the study is to compare the overall subjective comfort profile over 8 hours of lens wear in two groups of habitual soft contact lens wearers (daily disposable hydrogel lenses and frequent replacement lenses) when refitted in to somofilcon A lenses.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 22, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 28, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 8, 2019
CompletedFebruary 8, 2019
February 1, 2019
5 months
October 22, 2015
January 30, 2017
February 5, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Comfort
Subjective ratings for lens comfort of etafilcon A and somofilcon A. Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, causes pain, 100=cannot be felt ever.
8 hours
Comfort Preference
Lens preference in regards to comfort of etafilcon A and somofilcon A. Categories: Strongly prefer etafilcon A lens, slightly prefer etafilcon A lens, no preference, slightly prefer somofilcon A lens, strongly prefer somofilcon A lens
Baseline and 8 hours
Bulbar Hyperemia
Bulbar hyperemia examination using Efron scale 0-4, 0.5 steps, 0=normal, 4=severe.
Baseline and 8 hours
Limbal Hyperemia
Limbal hyperemia examination using Efron scale 0-4, 0.5 steps, 0=normal, 4=severe.
Baseline and 8 hours
Conjunctival Staining
Conjunctival staining was graded in each quadrant with scale 0-4, 0.5 steps, 0=normal, 4=severe of four areas: N - Nasal, T - Temporal, S - Superior, I - Interior, C - Central
8 hours
Visual Acuity
High contrast visual acuity at high illumination was measured with each lens at each visit using a logMAR chart.
Baseline and 8 hours
Study Arms (2)
Etafilcon A (control)
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects in each of the habitual wearing groups will be randomized to wear either the test or control lens in either the left or right eye.
Somofilcon A (test)
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects in each of the habitual wearing groups will be randomized to wear either the test or control lens in either the left or right eye.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Is at least 17 years of age and has full legal capacity to volunteer;
- Has read and signed an information consent letter;
- Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule;
- Is correctable to a visual acuity of 20/40 or better (in each eye) with their habitual correction or the assigned study lenses;
- Habitually wears either etafilcon A lens or any frequent replacement contact lenses (as defined in 4.1.1);
- Habitually wear contact lenses with a power between -1.00 and -6.00D (Diopters) (inclusive) in both eyes;
- Demonstrates an acceptable fit with the study lenses;
- Is usually able to wear contact lenses for at least 8 hours per day.
You may not qualify if:
- A person will be excluded from the study if he/she:
- Is participating in any concurrent clinical or research study;
- Has any known active\* ocular disease and/or infection;
- Has a systemic condition that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable;
- Is using any systemic or topical medications that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable;
- Has known sensitivity to the diagnostic substances (pharmaceuticals), such as fluorescein dye, or products to be used in the study;
- Is aphakic;
- Has undergone refractive error surgery.
- Has participated in the previous somfofilcon A study (ORE# 20893)
- For the purposes of this study, active ocular disease is defined as infection or inflammation which requires therapeutic treatment. Mild (i.e. not considered clinically relevant) lid abnormalities (blepharitis, meibomian gland dysfunction, papillae), corneal and conjunctival staining and dry eye are not considered active ocular disease. Neovascularization and corneal scars are the result of previous hypoxia, infection or inflammation and are therefore not active.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Center for Contact Lens Research, University of Waterloo
Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada
University of Waterloo
Waterloo, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Senior Manager Global Medical Scientific Affairs
- Organization
- CooperVision Inc.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lyndon Jones, PhD, FCOptom
Centre for Contact Lens Research
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 22, 2015
First Posted
October 28, 2015
Study Start
October 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 1, 2016
Study Completion
April 1, 2016
Last Updated
February 8, 2019
Results First Posted
February 8, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02