NCT02588573

Brief Summary

The objective of the study is to compare the overall subjective comfort profile over 8 hours of lens wear in two groups of habitual soft contact lens wearers (daily disposable hydrogel lenses and frequent replacement lenses) when refitted in to somofilcon A lenses.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
103

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2015

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2015

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 22, 2015

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 28, 2015

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2016

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2016

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 8, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

February 8, 2019

Status Verified

February 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

October 22, 2015

Results QC Date

January 30, 2017

Last Update Submit

February 5, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Comfort

    Subjective ratings for lens comfort of etafilcon A and somofilcon A. Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, causes pain, 100=cannot be felt ever.

    8 hours

  • Comfort Preference

    Lens preference in regards to comfort of etafilcon A and somofilcon A. Categories: Strongly prefer etafilcon A lens, slightly prefer etafilcon A lens, no preference, slightly prefer somofilcon A lens, strongly prefer somofilcon A lens

    Baseline and 8 hours

  • Bulbar Hyperemia

    Bulbar hyperemia examination using Efron scale 0-4, 0.5 steps, 0=normal, 4=severe.

    Baseline and 8 hours

  • Limbal Hyperemia

    Limbal hyperemia examination using Efron scale 0-4, 0.5 steps, 0=normal, 4=severe.

    Baseline and 8 hours

  • Conjunctival Staining

    Conjunctival staining was graded in each quadrant with scale 0-4, 0.5 steps, 0=normal, 4=severe of four areas: N - Nasal, T - Temporal, S - Superior, I - Interior, C - Central

    8 hours

  • Visual Acuity

    High contrast visual acuity at high illumination was measured with each lens at each visit using a logMAR chart.

    Baseline and 8 hours

Study Arms (2)

Etafilcon A (control)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects in each of the habitual wearing groups will be randomized to wear either the test or control lens in either the left or right eye.

Device: etafilcon A (control)Device: somofilcon A (test)

Somofilcon A (test)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects in each of the habitual wearing groups will be randomized to wear either the test or control lens in either the left or right eye.

Device: etafilcon A (control)Device: somofilcon A (test)

Interventions

contact lens

Etafilcon A (control)Somofilcon A (test)

contact lens

Etafilcon A (control)Somofilcon A (test)

Eligibility Criteria

Age17 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Is at least 17 years of age and has full legal capacity to volunteer;
  • Has read and signed an information consent letter;
  • Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule;
  • Is correctable to a visual acuity of 20/40 or better (in each eye) with their habitual correction or the assigned study lenses;
  • Habitually wears either etafilcon A lens or any frequent replacement contact lenses (as defined in 4.1.1);
  • Habitually wear contact lenses with a power between -1.00 and -6.00D (Diopters) (inclusive) in both eyes;
  • Demonstrates an acceptable fit with the study lenses;
  • Is usually able to wear contact lenses for at least 8 hours per day.

You may not qualify if:

  • A person will be excluded from the study if he/she:
  • Is participating in any concurrent clinical or research study;
  • Has any known active\* ocular disease and/or infection;
  • Has a systemic condition that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable;
  • Is using any systemic or topical medications that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable;
  • Has known sensitivity to the diagnostic substances (pharmaceuticals), such as fluorescein dye, or products to be used in the study;
  • Is aphakic;
  • Has undergone refractive error surgery.
  • Has participated in the previous somfofilcon A study (ORE# 20893)
  • For the purposes of this study, active ocular disease is defined as infection or inflammation which requires therapeutic treatment. Mild (i.e. not considered clinically relevant) lid abnormalities (blepharitis, meibomian gland dysfunction, papillae), corneal and conjunctival staining and dry eye are not considered active ocular disease. Neovascularization and corneal scars are the result of previous hypoxia, infection or inflammation and are therefore not active.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Center for Contact Lens Research, University of Waterloo

Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada

Location

University of Waterloo

Waterloo, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Refractive ErrorsEye Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Senior Manager Global Medical Scientific Affairs
Organization
CooperVision Inc.

Study Officials

  • Lyndon Jones, PhD, FCOptom

    Centre for Contact Lens Research

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 22, 2015

First Posted

October 28, 2015

Study Start

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion

March 1, 2016

Study Completion

April 1, 2016

Last Updated

February 8, 2019

Results First Posted

February 8, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-02

Locations