Comparison of nanOss Cervical IBF System to C-Plus PEEK IBF Device With Autograft
Post Market Comparison of nanOss Cervical Interbody Fusion System to C-Plus Interbody Fusion Device With Autograft
1 other identifier
interventional
11
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a post-market, prospective, randomized clinical investigation to evaluate the performance of the nanOss Cervical Interbody Fusion (IBF) device with nanOss Bioactive Bone Void Filler for the treatment of cervical disc disease. A secondary objective is to compare the performance of the nanOss Cervical IBF Device and nanOss Bioactive Bone Void Filler with the performance of the C-Plus PEEK IBF Device with autograft. This study will enroll 40 patients at one (1) site. After subjects have signed an informed consent, they will be randomly assigned to either the nanOss Cervical IBF device arm or the C-Plus PEEK IBF Device. Patients will complete the preoperative visit and examinations. Patients will be evaluated at discharge, six (6) weeks, three (3) months, six (6) months, and twelve (12) months. Patients will be evaluated at twenty-four (24) months post-operatively if they have not demonstrated fusion at the 12 month time point.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 16, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 26, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2019
CompletedJuly 27, 2020
July 1, 2020
3.4 years
October 16, 2015
July 23, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of patients demonstrating fusion at 12 months post-operatively
Fusion is defined as the presence of bridging bone between adjacent endplates of the involved motion segment, AND ≤ 2º total angular motion from flexion to extension, AND \< 1.25 mm translational motion.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Scores on the Neck Disability Index Questionnaire
12 months
Pain on the Visual Analog Scale
12 months
Adverse Events
12 months
Score on the EQ-5D Health Outcomes Survey
12 months
Disc Height in millimetres
12 months
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
nanOss
ACTIVE COMPARATORnanOss Cervical IBF System with nanOss BA Bone Void Filler
C-Plus
ACTIVE COMPARATORC-Plus PEEK IBF Device with autograft
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Is at least 21 years of age and skeletally mature.
- Must have cervical disc disease (defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies) at one level in the cervical spine between C3 to T1.
- Must have completed a minimum of six weeks of unsuccessful conservative, non- operative care or has the presence of progressive symptoms or signs of nerve root/spinal cord compression in the face of conservative treatment
- Has pre-operative objective evidence of primary diagnosis confirmed by appropriate imaging studies (AP/LAT/FLX/EXT X-rays \& a recent MRI)
- Is willing and able to comply with all clinical investigation visits and procedures including screening treatment procedures, post-operative management, the follow-up schedule and completion of forms or questionnaires.
- Is able to understand and sign the informed consent document
You may not qualify if:
- Requires fusion at more than one level
- Has had prior fusion at the level to be treated.
- Has a metabolic or systemic bone disorder.
- Has a disease that significantly inhibits bone healing (i.e., severe osteoporosis, osteomalacia, Paget's disease)
- Has a systemic or local infection (active or latent)
- Has acute or chronic infections in the surgical area (i.e., soft tissue infections; inflammatory, bacterial bone disorders, osteomyelitis)
- chronic use of steroids, other than episodic use or inhaled corticosteroids
- has any significant general illness (i.e. tested positive for HIV, Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C, has active metastatic cancer of any type, uncontrolled diabetes Type I, dialysis dependent renal failure, symptomatic liver disease)
- has a mental or physical condition that would limit the ability to comply with study requirements or would preclude accurate evaluation.
- Is immunocompromised or being treated with immunosuppressive agents (including chemotherapy or radiation treatment).
- has documented allergies to hydroxyapatite or porcine collagen, PEEK, titanium, titanium alloy or tantalum.
- currently pregnant, or interested in becoming pregnant during the clinical investigation follow-up
- is a smoker
- is a prisoner
- is currently involved in another drug or device clinical investigation that may confound the clinical investigation data.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- RTI Surgicallead
Study Sites (1)
Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg
Genk, 3600, Belgium
Related Publications (3)
Zhao Z, Jiang D, Ou Y, Tang K, Luo X, Quan Z. A hollow cylindrical nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide composite strut for cervical reconstruction after cervical corpectomy. J Clin Neurosci. 2012 Apr;19(4):536-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.05.043. Epub 2012 Feb 3.
PMID: 22305868BACKGROUNDKim SC, Kang SW, Kim SH, Cho KH, Kim SH. Clinical and radiological outcomes of anterior cervical interbody fusion using hydroxyapatite spacer. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2009 Oct;46(4):300-4. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2009.46.4.300. Epub 2009 Oct 31.
PMID: 19893716BACKGROUNDRyken TC, Heary RF, Matz PG, Anderson PA, Groff MW, Holly LT, Kaiser MG, Mummaneni PV, Choudhri TF, Vresilovic EJ, Resnick DK; Joint Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Techniques for cervical interbody grafting. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Aug;11(2):203-20. doi: 10.3171/2009.2.SPINE08723.
PMID: 19769500BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dieter Peuskens, MD
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 16, 2015
First Posted
October 26, 2015
Study Start
October 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 1, 2019
Study Completion
March 1, 2019
Last Updated
July 27, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share