NCT02585063

Brief Summary

The UK government's Crown report titled 'Review of prescribing, supply \& administration of medicines' enabled optometrists to train for the qualification of independent prescribing (IP). The UK introduced IP for optometrists in 2009. The proposed research focuses on the role of IP optometrist in the acute ophthalmic services of Manchester Royal Eye Hospital (MREH). The study will compare IP optometrists to consultant ophthalmologists in the ability to diagnose, manage and prescribe medication for patients accessing these services. To achieve this comparison consenting participants will first have a clinical assessment with the IP Optometrist, where findings including diagnosis and management plan will be recorded onto a research proforma. The consultant ophthalmologist will be masked to the IP Optometrist's research proforma to prevent bias. The consultant ophthalmologist will then perform a clinical assessment on a second proforma and inform the participant of their diagnosis and management plan. Percentage agreement, kappa (κ) and weighted κ will be calculated for a range of parameters between the two proformas. Disagreement in diagnosis or management will be arbitrated by a separate ophthalmologist participating in the study with a specialty relevant to the participant's condition. The main objective of the research is to expand the limited base of evidence of of IP optometrists' ability to diagnose, manage and prescribe medication and to determine whether they work at least as safely and effectively as consultant ophthalmologists in acute ophthalmic services. It is the first study in this area since the advent of IP for optometrists, with only one previous study published before IP was introduced. The research will enable the type and frequency of conditions presenting in these services to be measured. Furthermore it will identify conditions that IP optometrists can manage independently and enable guidelines for these conditions to be developed.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
321

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2015

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 14, 2015

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 23, 2015

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2015

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 13, 2017

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 12, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

January 14, 2021

Status Verified

January 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

October 14, 2015

Last Update Submit

January 13, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

independent prescribing,optometristacute care

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Prescribing decision

    The prescribing decisions of ophthalmologists and optometrists will be compared. They will be documented via self-reports.

    Through study completion - up to 18 months

Study Arms (1)

Dual assessment

Where there is time and space, participants will be allocated to have a clinical assessment by the IP optometrist during their wait for the clinical assessment with the ophthalmologist. Both clinical assessments are needed to obtain measurement of agreement. There is no intervention. but participants have two clinical assessments rather than just one.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients will be invited to take part in the study and given the study information either while being triaged in the walk-in, nurse-led Emergency Eye Centre (EEC) to the appointments-based Acute Referral Clinic (ARC) or at arrival at ARC. An approved poster will advertise the study and will be place on the wall in both ARC and EEC. There will be a smaller version on the reception desk at both ARC and EEC accompanied by a participant information leaflet.

You may qualify if:

  • All adult patients referred to MREH's Acute Referral Clinic. Referrals to ARC may be by MREH's nurse led Emergency Eye Centre, by optometrists in the community, by general practitioners, by other medical specialist or by patients with known uveitis (an inflammatory eye condition that may be recurrent).
  • Adult patients invited within the Emergency Eye Centre.
  • Adult patients with capacity for informed consent and willingness to participate.
  • Adult patients who are English speaking.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients under the age of 18 years.
  • Patients without capacity or willingness to consent.
  • Patients unable to comply with routine clinical ophthalmic assessments.
  • Patients who require an interpreter.
  • Patients presenting with conditions that require immediate intervention for example; chemical burn or acute angle closure glaucoma.
  • Patients who are prisoners or young offenders.
  • All in-patients as their care is outside of the skills and experience of an optometrist.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Manchester Royal Eye Hospital

Manchester, M13 9WL, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Eye Abnormalities

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Eye DiseasesCongenital AbnormalitiesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Study Officials

  • Cindy Tromans, PhD

    Manchester Royal Eye Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2015

First Posted

October 23, 2015

Study Start

December 1, 2015

Primary Completion

December 13, 2017

Study Completion

September 12, 2018

Last Updated

January 14, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-01

Locations