Comparing Ultrasound Guided PICC Line Insertion in Neonates With Standard Procedure
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Ultrasound Guided PICC Line Insertion in Neonates With Standard Procedure
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a randomized controlled study comparing US guided vs standard procedure for PICC line placement in newborns admitted to Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Neonatal Intensive Care Unit who require a PICC line. Patients will be randomized using REDCap randomization module (stratified by gestational age \< 28 weeks and \>= 28 weeks and blocked to ensure approximate balance with each stratum) into two arms. - Arm 1: PICC line insertion procedure using anatomical landmarks and tip placement will be confirmed by X-ray (current standard); Arm 2: US guided PICC line insertion procedure and tip placement confirmation by both US and X-ray. Sample size of 33 infants per group would achieve greater than 80% power to detect a difference between groups. Primary outcome: Time to complete the standard versus the US-guided procedure. Secondary outcomes (comparison between two arms): The number of total "venipuncture" attempts needed to place a PICC line Number of tip manipulations after complete insertion Proportion of successful tip placement
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 21, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 22, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2020
CompletedJuly 30, 2020
July 1, 2020
3.7 years
October 21, 2015
July 29, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to complete the standard versus the US-guided procedure
Comparison between total time of procedure with standard approach vs US guidance measured in minutes.
one year
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Number of total venipuncture attempts needed to place a PICC line
One year
Number of tip manipulations after complete insertion
One year
Proportion of successful tip placement
One year
Study Arms (2)
Standard procedure group
NO INTERVENTIONPICC line insertion using anatomical landmarks guidance and tip placement confirmation by X-ray
Interventional group
EXPERIMENTALUltrasound guidance for PICC line placement and X-ray
Interventions
Apply ultrasound guidance for PICC line placement and positioning in newborns
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All newborns (0-28 days) admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit who require PICC line insertion after consent has been obtained to include in this study. Including:
- Infants who need prolonged Total Parenteral Nutrition requirement of \> 7 days.
- Infants with difficult peripheral venous access who requires a central line
- Infants who require IV medications for \> 7 days.
- Infants who require medications given by central IV access
- Infants who will undergo complex surgical procedures and will require central IV access before procedure.
You may not qualify if:
- Infants requiring isolation according to infection control protocols
- Unable to obtain or refused consent for PICC line and/or study enrolment
- Infants with any clinical contraindication for PICC line insertion as per unit policy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H8L1, Canada
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nadya Ben Fadel, MD
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Neonatologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 21, 2015
First Posted
October 22, 2015
Study Start
July 1, 2016
Primary Completion
March 30, 2020
Study Completion
March 30, 2020
Last Updated
July 30, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07