NCT02581514

Brief Summary

Eosinophilia, defined by a blood eosinophil granulocytes rate greater than 500 / mm3, is frequently encountered in internal medicine. Its causes are varied: atopy, drug allergies, parasitic infections, autoimmune diseases and solid neoplasias. Over 200 etiologies have been reported, some difficult to diagnose and can be life-threatening Eosinophilia can be a diagnostic dilemma, as the etiologies are extensive and varied. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of a diagnostic approach based on a decision algorithm in a group of patients with eosinophilia. We assume that a procedure with a hierarchy of additional tests would increase the frequency of diagnosed cases while decreasing the time to diagnosis. This procedure defined by an algorithm would even reduce the number of tests necessary to reach a diagnosis.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
53

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2015

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2015

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 19, 2015

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 21, 2015

Completed
3.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

June 5, 2019

Status Verified

June 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

3.9 years

First QC Date

October 19, 2015

Last Update Submit

June 4, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

decision algorithm

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of patients having correctly follow the diagnosis algorithm

    This outcome measure how many patients have correctly followed the diagnosis algorithm

    5 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Rate of diagnosis

    5 months

  • Assess the time to diagnosis

    5 months

  • Description of diagnosis

    5 months

Study Arms (1)

Algorithm

EXPERIMENTAL

Eosinophilia is assessed following the diagnosis algorithm

Other: Scheduled exams and diagnosis

Interventions

Scheduled exams and diagnosis circuit as imposed by the algorithm

Algorithm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient having one of the three following criteria:
  • hypereosinophilia\> 1500 / mm3, checked on at least two samples (interval between 2 samples at the discretion of the clinician)
  • or hypereosinophilia\> 500 cells / mm3 and organ damage with infiltration NCB proven by pathological examination,
  • Patient affiliated or beneficiary of a social security system
  • Patient who signed the informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient with solid tumors known (under chemotherapy or planned)
  • Patient unable to understand or to adhere to the Protocol
  • Patient unable to give consent
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Patient already participating in an interventional trial

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Médecine Interne A

Limoges, 87000, France

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hypereosinophilic Syndrome

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

EosinophiliaLeukocyte DisordersHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Holy BEZANAHARY

    University Hospital, Limoges

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 19, 2015

First Posted

October 21, 2015

Study Start

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion

September 1, 2019

Study Completion

November 1, 2019

Last Updated

June 5, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-06

Locations