Study Stopped
Due to an error in the implementation of the project, CDS was provided to all providers, rather than to the intended random sample of providers.
Clinical Decision Support (CDS) for Outpatient Radiology Imaging
The Impact of Clinical Decision Support (CDS) for Outpatient Radiology Imaging: A Randomized Control Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
2,033
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The goal of the study is to determine whether clinical decision support (CDS) affects the number, type, or appropriateness of targeted high-cost radiology images (i.e. MR and CT) ordered. The CDS will be delivered in Epic through ACRSelect software, which is a leading decision support tool based on the American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria (see http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Appropriateness-Criteria), and presents the ACR appropriateness scores for each image on a scale of 1-9 with 1-3 labelled as 'usually not appropriate', 4-6 'May be appropriate', and 7-9 'usually appropriate'.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 15, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 16, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2016
CompletedJanuary 24, 2017
January 1, 2017
7 months
October 15, 2015
January 23, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
number of "non-advised" scans ordered per visiting provider
"non-advised" scans are (a) all magnetic resonance (MR) or computed tomography (CT) scans that ACR Select rates 1-3 ("usually not appropriate"), and (b) all MR or CT scans rated 4-6 ("may be appropriate") for which an alternative scan (MR, CT, or other modality) rated 7-9 ("usually appropriate") exists
first 365 days after CDS is turned on for the treatment group
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of scans ordered per visiting provider that ACR Select rates 1-3 ("usually not appropriate")
first 365 days after CDS is turned on for the treatment group
Number of scans ordered per visiting provider that ACR Select rates 4-6 ("may be appropriate") for which an alternative scan (MR, CT, or other modality) rated 7-9 ("usually appropriate") exists
first 365 days after CDS is turned on for the treatment group
Study Arms (2)
Treatment
EXPERIMENTALClinical Decision Support (CDS)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONWill not receive Clinical Decision Support (CDS)
Interventions
A best practices alert (BPA) pop-up screen providing CDS will appear at physician sign-off for all scans scored 1-3, and scans scored 4-6 for which an alternative scan scored 7-9 exists. This screen will show the appropriateness score of the original scan order, and will display any alternative scans that are scored 7-9 for the same indications and patient characteristics. It will also display a link to relevant ACR documentation relevant to the selected scan and indication. Any time the pop-up alert appears, a checkbox removing the selected scan from unsigned orders will be checked by default.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Outpatient medical provider with scan ordering permissions at Mount Sinai Hospital or Mount Sinai Queens
- Has an active ID in the Epic electronic medical record ordering system
You may not qualify if:
- Opted out of the study prior to October 13, 2015
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Mount Sinai Queens
Long Island City, New York, 11102, United States
Mount Sinai Hospital
New York, New York, 10029, United States
Related Publications (11)
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2013. National Health Expenditures 2013 Highlights. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
BACKGROUNDCallaghan BC, Kerber KA, Pace RJ, Skolarus LE, Burke JF. Headaches and neuroimaging: high utilization and costs despite guidelines. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 May;174(5):819-21. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.173. No abstract available.
PMID: 24638246BACKGROUNDSherman, D., 2012. Stemming the tide of overtreatment in U.S. healthcare. Reuters. Feb 16, 2012.
BACKGROUNDU.S. Government Accountability Office, 2008. Medicare Part B Imaging Services: Rapid Spending Growth and Shift to Physician Offices Indicate Need for CMS to Consider Additional Management Practices [WWW Document]. URL http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-452 (accessed 2.23.15).
BACKGROUNDConsumer Reports, 2015. Surprising Dangers of CT Scans and X-rays - Consumer Reports [WWW Document]. URL http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/magazine/2015/01/the-surprising-dangers-of-ct-sans-and-x-rays/index.htm (accessed 2.25.15).
BACKGROUNDDehn, T.G., O'Connell, B., Hall, R.N., Moulton, T., 2000. Appropriateness of imaging examinations: current state and future approaches. Imaging Econ 13, 18-26.
BACKGROUNDGeorgiou A, Prgomet M, Markewycz A, Adams E, Westbrook JI. The impact of computerized provider order entry systems on medical-imaging services: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 May 1;18(3):335-40. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000043. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
PMID: 21385821BACKGROUNDMedicare Payment Advisory Commission, 2014. Health Care Spending and the Medicare Program. MedPAC.
BACKGROUNDShreibati JB, Baker LC. The relationship between low back magnetic resonance imaging, surgery, and spending: impact of physician self-referral status. Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct;46(5):1362-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01265.x. Epub 2011 Apr 21.
PMID: 21517834BACKGROUNDBrenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29;357(22):2277-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra072149. No abstract available.
PMID: 18046031BACKGROUNDPitts, J., 2014. The Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014.
BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Amy Finkelstein, PhD
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Madhu Mazumdar, Mazumdar
The Mount Sinai Health System
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bruce Darrow, MD, PhD
The Mount Sinai Health System
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joseph Kannry, MD
The Mount Sinai Health System
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David S Mendelson, MD FACR
The Mount Sinai Health System
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joseph Doyle, PhD
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jesse Shapiro, PhD
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Laura Feeney, MA
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 15, 2015
First Posted
October 16, 2015
Study Start
October 1, 2015
Primary Completion
May 1, 2016
Study Completion
May 1, 2016
Last Updated
January 24, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-01