Diagnostic Genicular Nerve Block Prior to Radiofrequency Ablation for Knee Osteoarthritis Pain
A Prospective Trial of Zero Versus One Diagnostic Genicular Nerve Blocks to Determine Clinical Outcomes After Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Chronic Painful Knee Osteoarthritis
1 other identifier
interventional
63
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Chronic painful knee OA is a major cause of disability in older adults. In patients whose symptoms are refractory to conservative management but who do not wish to undergo TKA or, alternatively, are not operative candidates, genicular nerve RFA represents a promising treatment option. Investigators will determine if patients with chronic painful knee osteoarthritis experience meaningful and long-term improvement in pain, function, and analgesic use, as well as prevention of TKA after RFA of the genicular nerves. Investigators will also determine whether zero versus one set of diagnostic genicular nerve blocks Answering these questions will help determine if genicular nerve RFA is indeed a worthwhile treatment for chronic painful knee OA. Additionally, this will help determine the optimal diagnostic protocol for patient selection for this procedure, which has implications for improving treatment success rates, preventing unnecessary procedures, and decreasing healthcare cost savings.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 14, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 16, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2018
CompletedAugust 21, 2019
September 1, 2017
2.9 years
October 14, 2015
August 20, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
>50% relief of pain from before to after radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves
Outcomes will be compared between those who received a set of diagnostic blocks and those who did not receive a set of diagnostic blocks (arm 1 vs. arm 2)
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Mean reduction in morphine equivalent use for knee pain from before to after radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves
6 months
Study Arms (2)
no diagnostic genicular nerve blocks
ACTIVE COMPARATORno diagnostic genicular nerve blocks prior to genicular nerve ablation Intervention: genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation
diagnostic genicular nerve blocks
ACTIVE COMPARATORSet of diagnostic genicular nerve blocks prior to genicular nerve ablation Intervention: genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation
Interventions
sensory denervation of the knee joint
Ablation of the genicular nerves of the knee by radiofrequency energy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients ages 30-80 with chronic painful knee osteoarthritis who would undergo treatment by genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation.
- Knee pain for at least 6 months.
- Kellgren-Lawrence knee osteoarthritis of 2 or greater.
- Pain resistant to conventional therapy including NSAIDs, opioids, muscle relaxants, oral steroids, physical therapy, and intra-articular injection therapy.
- No pain referral beyond the expected distribution for knee osteoarthritis.
You may not qualify if:
- NRS pain score of 4 or more
- Focal neurologic signs or symptoms.
- Previous radiofrequency ablation treatment for similar symptoms.
- Intra-articular knee corticosteroid or hyaluronic acid injection in the past 3 months.
- Concomitant radicular pain.
- Previous knee surgery.
- Patient refusal.
- Lack of consent.
- Active systemic or local infections at the site of proposed needle and electrode placement.
- Coagulopathy or other bleeding disorder, current use of anticoagulants or anti-platelet medications.
- Allergy to medications being used for injection procedures (contrast, local anesthetic).
- Inability to read English, communicate with staff, or participate in follow-up.
- Pregnancy.
- Pacemaker.
- Cognitive deficit.
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zachary McCormick, MD
Northwestern University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 14, 2015
First Posted
October 16, 2015
Study Start
October 1, 2015
Primary Completion
September 1, 2018
Study Completion
September 1, 2018
Last Updated
August 21, 2019
Record last verified: 2017-09