A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of the Combination of AL-335, Odalasvir, and Simeprevir
A Phase 2a, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of the Combination of AL-335 and Odalasvir, With or Without Simeprevir, in Treatment-Naïve Subjects With Genotype 1, 2 or 3 Chronic Hepatitis C Infection With or Without Compensated Child Pugh A Cirrhosis
1 other identifier
interventional
161
4 countries
11
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of AL-335 in combination with odalasvir (ODV) with or without simeprevir (SMV) in participants with genotype (GT)1 or GT2 or GT3 chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Oct 2015
11 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 7, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 31, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 11, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 11, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 16, 2019
CompletedJuly 16, 2019
June 1, 2019
2.5 years
October 1, 2015
May 9, 2019
June 24, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-emergent were events between administration of study drug and up to 43 weeks that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state.
Up to 43 weeks
Body Weight at End of Treatment
Body weight (measured using a calibrated scale) at end of treatment was reported.
End of treatment (Cohort 3: 6 weeks; Cohort 1, Cohort 1b+ Cohort 4, Cohort 2, Cohort 5a, and Cohort 6, 7, 8: 8 weeks; Cohort 4, Cohort 5b, Cohort 9 and Cohort 11: 12 weeks)
Body Mass Index (BMI) at End of Treatment
BMI was calculated by dividing the body weight (in kilogram) by the square of height (in meters). BMI at end of treatment was reported.
End of treatment (Cohort 3: 6 weeks; Cohort 1, Cohort 1b+ Cohort 4, Cohort 2, Cohort 5a, and Cohort 6, 7, 8: 8 weeks; Cohort 4, Cohort 5b, Cohort 9 and Cohort 11: 12 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With Worst Post-Baseline Values of Vital Signs
Percentage of participants with worst post-baseline values of vital signs (Systolic blood pressure \[sBP\], Diastolic blood pressure \[dBP\], and Heart rate) were reported. For sBP, abnormally low: less than or equal to \[\<=\] 90 millimeters mercury \[mmHg\]; Grade 1 or mild: greater than \[\>\] 140 to less than \[\<\] 160 mmHg; Grade 2 or moderate: \>=160 to \<180 and Grade 3 or severe: \>=180 mmHg. For dBP, abnormally low: \<=50 mmHg; Grade 1 or mild: \>90 to \<100 mmHg; Grade 2 or moderate: \>=100 to \<110 mmHg and Grade 3 or severe: \>=110 mmHg. For Heart Rate, abnormally low: \<=50 beats per minute \[bpm\] and abnormally high: \>=120 bpm.
Up to 43 weeks
Percentage of Participants With Maximum Decrease From Baseline in Mean Ejection Fraction
Percentage of participants with maximum decrease from baseline in mean ejection fraction was reported. Percentages are based on the number of participants with available data.
Baseline up to End of treatment (up to 43 weeks)
Percentage of Participants by Treatment Emergent Toxicity Grade - Hematology Parameters
Percentage of participants by treatment emergent toxicity grade (1, 2, 3, 4 and 3+4) for Hematology parameters (hemoglobin, lymphocytes, neutrophils, leukocytes, platelets) were reported. Toxicity grades were defined as Grade 1: Mild; Grade 2: Moderate; Grade 3: Severe and Grade 4: potentially life-threatening. A toxicity is treatment-emergent if it is worse than the baseline or if baseline is missing.
Up to 43 weeks
Percentage of Participants by Treatment Emergent Toxicity Grade - Blood Chemistry Parameters
Percentage of participants by treatment emergent toxicity grade (Grade 1,2,3,4,3+4) for Blood Chemistry (Calcium, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, Bicarbonate, Alanine aminotransferase, Alkaline phosphatase, Aspartate aminotransferase, Bilirubin, Direct bilirubin, Glucose, Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Urate, Triacylglycerol lipase, Creatinine, Creatinine clearance, Albumin and Creatine kinase) were reported. Toxicity grades were defined as Grade 1: Mild; Grade 2: Moderate; Grade 3: Severe and Grade 4: potentially life-threatening. A toxicity is treatment-emergent if it is worse than the baseline or if baseline is missing.
Up to 43 weeks
Percentage of Participants by Treatment Emergent Toxicity Grade - Prothrombin International Normalized Ratio (INR)
Percentage of participants by treatment emergent toxicity grade for coagulation parameter (Prothrombin International Normalized Ratio) were reported. Toxicity grades were defined as Grade 1: Mild; Grade 2: Moderate; Grade 3: Severe and Grade 4: potentially life-threatening. A toxicity is treatment-emergent if it is worse than the baseline or if baseline is missing.
Up to 43 weeks
Percentage of Participants by Treatment Emergent Toxicity Grade - Urinalysis Parameter (Protein)
Percentage of participants by treatment emergent toxicity grade (Grade 1, 2, 3, 4, 3+4) for urinalysis parameter (protein) was reported. Toxicity grades were defined as Grade 1: Mild; Grade 2: Moderate; Grade 3: Severe and Grade 4: potentially life-threatening. A toxicity is treatment-emergent if it is worse than the baseline or if baseline is missing.
Up to 43 weeks
Percentage of Participants With Worst Treatment Emergent Abnormalities of Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters
Percentage of participants with worst treatment emergent abnormalities of ECG parameters (Fridericia Corrected QT interval \[QTcF\], Bazett Corrected QT interval \[QTcB\], Heart rate, QRS and PR, was reported. For QTcF abnormality was defined as 30 milliseconds (ms) less than or equal to (\<=) QTcF increase from baseline \<= 60 ms; for QTcB abnormality was defined as 30 ms \<= QTcB increase from baseline \<= 60 ms; for heart rate - abnormal low: \<= 50 beats per minute (bpm) and abnormal high: \>= 120 bpm; for QRS - abnormal high: \>120 ms; for PR - abnormally low: PR \< 120 ms; abnormally high - 200 ms \< PR \<= 240 ms and 240 ms \< PR \<= 300 ms.
Up to 43 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (34)
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) at Week 4, 12 and 24 After End of Treatment
At Week 4, 12 and Week 24 after end of treatment (Cohort 3: 6 weeks; Cohort 1, Cohort 1b+ Cohort 4, Cohort 2, Cohort 5a, and Cohort 6, 7, 8: 8 weeks; Cohort 4, Cohort 5b, Cohort 9 and Cohort 11: 12 weeks)
Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmin) of AL-335 and Its Metabolites (ALS-022399 and ALS-022227)
Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 24 hours postdose (Week 2), 2-4 hours postdose (Weeks 3 and 6), 6-8 hours postdose (Weeks 4 and 8)
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AL-335 and Its Metabolites (ALS-022399 and ALS-022227)
Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 24 hours postdose (Week 2), 2-4 hours postdose (Weeks 3 and 6), 6-8 hours postdose (Weeks 4 and 8)
Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) for AL-335 and Its Metabolites (ALS-022399 and ALS-022227)
Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 24 hours postdose (Week 2), 2-4 hours postdose (Weeks 3 and 6), 6-8 hours postdose (Weeks 4 and 8)
Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AL-335 and Its Metabolites (ALS-022399 and ALS-022227)
Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 24 hours postdose (Week 2), 2-4 hours postdose (Weeks 3 and 6), 6-8 hours postdose (Weeks 4 and 8)
- +29 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (8)
Cohorts 1 and 2 (Without Cirrhosis) : AL-335+ODV+SMV
EXPERIMENTALTreatment-naïve non-cirrhotic Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected participants will receive AL-335 and Odalasvir (ODV) with Simeprevir (SMV) for 8 weeks.
Cohort 1b (Without Cirrhosis) : AL-335+ODV
EXPERIMENTALTreatment-naïve non-cirrhotic HCV-infected participants will receive AL-335 and ODV for 8 weeks.
Cohort 3 (Without Cirrhosis) : AL-335+ODV+SMV
EXPERIMENTALTreatment-naïve non-cirrhotic HCV-infected participants will receive AL-335 and ODV with SMV for 6 weeks.
Cohort 4 (Without Cirrhosis) : AL-335+ODV
EXPERIMENTALTreatment-naïve non-cirrhotic HCV-infected participants will receive AL-335 and ODV up to 8 or 12 weeks.
Cohort 5 (Without Cirrhosis) : AL-335+ODV + SMV
EXPERIMENTALTreatment-naïve non-cirrhotic HCV-infected participants will receive AL-335 and ODV with SMV up to 8 or 12 weeks.
Cohorts 6, 7, 8 and 12 (With Cirrhosis) : AL-335+ODV+SMV
EXPERIMENTALTreatment naïve or treatment experienced HCV-infected participants with compensated cirrhosis will receive AL-335 and ODV with SMV for 8 weeks.
Cohorts 9, 10 and 11 (With Cirrhosis) : AL-335+ODV+SMV
EXPERIMENTALTreatment naïve or treatment experienced HCV-infected participants with compensated cirrhosis will receive AL-335 and ODV with SMV for 12 weeks.
Cohorts 12 to 15: AL-335+ODV With/without SMV
EXPERIMENTALBased on safety, pharmacokinetic (PK), and viral load data, the treatment duration (4 to 12 weeks) and dose levels (AL-335: 400-1,200 milligram \[mg\], ODV: 25-50 mg with/without SMV: 75-150 mg) may be changed for ongoing and future cohorts (up to 15) after obtaining agreement from the Sponsor and the Principal Investigator.
Interventions
AL-335 tablets will be administered in a dose range of 400 to 1200 mg once daily (QD).
ODV capsules will be administered in a dose range of 25 to 50 mg.
SMV tablets will be administered in a dose range of 75 to 150 mg QD or every other day (QOD).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participant has provided written consent
- In the Investigator's opinion, the participant is able to understand and comply with protocol requirements, instructions, and protocol stated restrictions and is likely to complete the study as planned
- Male or female, 18-70 years of age
- Body mass index (BMI) 18-35 kilogram per meter square (kg/m\^2), inclusive
- A woman of childbearing potential must have a negative serum (beta-human chorionic gonadotropin) pregnancy test at screening
- Female participants must either:
- not be of childbearing potential defined as: i. Postmenopausal for at least 12 months (that is \[i.e.\], 2 years of amenorrhea without an alternative medical cause) and a serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level in the postmenopausal range (per reference laboratory), OR ii. Surgically sterile (example \[e.g.\], underwent total hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, or bilateral tubal ligation/bilateral tubal clips without reversal operation), or otherwise incapable of becoming pregnant, OR
- be of childbearing potential AND
- not heterosexually active (e.g., abstinent or homosexual) from screening until 6 months after study drug administration (or longer, if dictated by local regulations), OR
- if heterosexually active
- have a vasectomized partner (confirmed sterile per verbal account of the participant), OR
- using an acceptable method of birth control from screening and agree to continue to use the same method of contraception throughout the study and for 6 months after study drug administration (or longer, if dictated by local regulations). Oral hormone based contraceptives are not allowed from 14 days before the planned study drug administration until 6 months after the last dose of treatment due to the potential for drug-drug interactions which might undermine their efficacy. An intrauterine device (IUD), being either hormonal (i.e., Intra-Uterine System \[IUS\*\]) or non-hormonal, is considered highly effective and reliable; therefore participants using an IUD/IUS are not required to use additional contraceptive methods (no double-barrier method is required). Other non-oral hormone-based contraception methods (e.g., injectable, implants, transdermal system, vaginal ring) may be continued, but as the interaction of the study drug with hormone-based contraception is unknown, these methods are not considered to be reliable and therefore participants should use a double-barrier method (e.g., male condom+either diaphragm or cervical cap with or without spermicide).
- An IUS does not rely on systemic plasma concentrations and is therefore not expected to be impacted by a potential drug-drug interaction (DDI)
- Note 1: Sexual abstinence is considered a highly effective method only if defined as refraining from heterosexual intercourse during the entire period of risk associated with the study drug. The reliability of sexual abstinence needs to be evaluated in relation to the duration of the study and the preferred and usual lifestyle of the participant.
- Note 2: A male and female condom should not be used together due to risk of breakage or damage caused by latex friction
- +17 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant, planning on becoming pregnant (during treatment and up to 6 months after the end of treatment \[EOT\]), or breast-feeding female participant, or male participant whose female partner is pregnant or planning on becoming pregnant (during treatment and up to 6 months after the EOT)
- Other than CHC with or without compensated cirrhosis, clinically significant cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, gastrointestinal, hematologic, neurologic, thyroid or any other medical illness or psychiatric disorder, as determined by the Investigator and/or Sponsor's Medical Monitor
- History or other clinical evidence of significant or unstable cardiac disease (e.g., angina, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, diastolic dysfunction, significant arrhythmia, coronary heart disease, and/or clinically significant ECG abnormalities), moderate to severe valvular disease or uncontrolled hypertension at screening
- Screening echocardiogram ejection fraction \<55 percentage (%) or any other echocardiographic finding suggestive of clinically relevant cardiomyopathy
- Creatinine clearance of \<60 mL/min (Cockcroft-Gault)
- Positive test for Hepatitis A virus immunoglobulin (HAV) Immunoglobulin M (IgM), Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), or Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Ab
- Abnormal screening laboratory results that are considered clinically significant by the investigator
- History of clinical hepatic decompensation, e.g., variceal bleeding, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy or active jaundice (within last year)
- Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise the study's objectives or the well-being of the participant or prevent the participant from meeting the study requirements
- Participation in an investigational drug trial or having received an investigational vaccine within 30 days or 5 half lives (whichever is longer) prior to study medication
- History or family history of abnormal ECG intervals, for example prolonged QT syndrome (torsade de pointes) or sudden cardiac death
- The participant has a positive prestudy drug screen, including methadone unless the drug is prescribed by the participant's physician. The list of drugs that should be screened for includes amphetamines, barbiturates, cocaine, opiates, phencyclidine (PCP), and benzodiazepines
- Laboratory abnormalities including:
- Hematocrit \<0.34
- White blood cell counts \<3,500/millimeter (mm)\^3 (\<1,000/mm\^3 for participants with compensated cirrhosis)
- +14 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (11)
CAP Research Ltd
Phoenix, Mauritius
Republican Clinical Hospital
Chisinau, Moldova
Auckland Clinical Studies
Auckland, 1150, New Zealand
Christchurch Clinical Studies Trust
Christchurch, 8011, New Zealand
Waikato Hospital
Hamilton, New Zealand
P3 Research Ltd - Hawkes Bay
Havelock North, New Zealand
P3 Research Ltd - Wellington
Wellington, New Zealand
Wellington Hospital
Wellington, New Zealand
King's College Hospital
Brixton, United Kingdom
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Glasgow Royal Infirmary
Glasgow, United Kingdom
Pennine Acute Hospitals Trust
Oldham, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Limitations of the study included the open-label design, limited sample size, and the lack of a comparator group.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director
- Organization
- Alios BioPharma, Inc
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Alios Biopharma Inc. Clinical Trial
Alios Biopharma Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 1, 2015
First Posted
October 7, 2015
Study Start
October 31, 2015
Primary Completion
May 11, 2018
Study Completion
May 11, 2018
Last Updated
July 16, 2019
Results First Posted
July 16, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-06