Involving Nursing Home Residents and Their Families in Acute Care Transfer Decisions
2 other identifiers
interventional
192
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study addresses the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) area of interest related to development of decision support tools that bring patients, families and clinicians together to decide, in this instance, whether or not transfer from the nursing home (NH) to acute care is necessary and appropriate. The purposes of this study were 1) to develop an evidence-based decision aid addressing potentially avoidable transfers of residents from nursing homes to hospitals (preceded this protocol), and 2) to evaluate this decision aid in terms of acceptability to residents and families and its effect on the quality of transfer decisions. The primary hypotheses to be tested are: Hypothesis 1: Resident and family members in the intervention group will report greater preparation for decision making and less decisional conflict than those in the no treatment control group. Hypothesis 2: Residents and family members in the intervention group will demonstrate increased knowledge related to acute care transfer and less preference for acute care transfer than those in the no treatment control group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 2, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 6, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 31, 2020
CompletedAugust 31, 2020
August 1, 2020
2.9 years
October 2, 2015
April 25, 2017
August 14, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Preparation for Decision Making
Range of possible raw scores: 10 - 50. Items can be summed and scored (sum the 10 items and divide by 10). There are no subscales. A higher score is positive indicating perception of being better prepared to make the decision identified when test is administered.
Decision Aid group only: Post test (2-3 weeks after pretest) and at 3 month follow-up (after post test)
Decisional Conflict Scale
Scale Range of possible raw scores: 0 - 64. A lower score indicates less decisional conflict related to making the identified decision. Decisional conflict is a state of uncertainty about a course of action. Decision supporting interventions are thought to be effective in
Decision aid: Pretest (baseline) and Post test (2-3 weeks after pretest); No decision aid: Post test only
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Knowledge Test
Pretest (baseline) and Post test (2-3 weeks after pretest)
Treatment Preference/Decisional Conflict Scale
Post test (2-3 weeks after pretest)
30 Day Hospital Readmission
Length of stay ≤30 days at Post test
Study Arms (2)
Decision aid
EXPERIMENTALProvision of "Go to the Hospital or Stay Here?"
No decision aid
NO INTERVENTIONDoes not receive the decision aid.
Interventions
Residents and families randomly assigned to the intervention group (one half of the residents and one half of the families enrolled) are given the new Decision Aid to review with an RA trained for this purpose by the investigators. The Decision Aid provides information on risks and benefits of acute care transfer and information on advance care planning, resident and families' right to be involved in the decision. Resident or family member is also asked to re-read it and think about it over the subsequent 14 days.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult nursing home resident and/or family member or identified significant other of a nursing home resident. Cognitively unimpaired individuals. Long or short term residents of nursing home or rehabilitation center.
You may not qualify if:
- Dementia as indicated by score on Mini-Cog. Inability to respond to questions due to physical disability or illness.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Florida Atlantic University, Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing
Boca Raton, Florida, 33431, United States
Related Publications (1)
Tappen RM, Worch SM, Elkins D, Hain DJ, Moffa CM, Sullivan G. Remaining in the nursing home versus transfer to acute care: resident, family, and staff preferences. J Gerontol Nurs. 2014 Oct;40(10):48-57. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20140807-01.
PMID: 25275783RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Ruth M. Tappen, Principal Investigator
- Organization
- Florida Atlantic University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ruth M. Tappen, EdD, RN, FAAN
Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing, Florida Atlantic University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Christine E. Lynn Eminent Scholar and Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 2, 2015
First Posted
October 6, 2015
Study Start
October 1, 2012
Primary Completion
September 1, 2015
Study Completion
September 1, 2015
Last Updated
August 31, 2020
Results First Posted
August 31, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-08