Home Based Care Transitions Tailored by Cognition and Patient Activation
1 other identifier
interventional
263
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There is overwhelming evidence that patients with multiple chronic illnesses need better self-management skills. Discharge from the hospital may not be the most opportune time to be teaching patients these self-management skills. There are several different care transition models being used across the country; however we know that not every patient needs the same type or amount of an intervention. The purpose of this pilot study is to study the impact delivering a home based care transitions intervention (HBCTI) with four different groups tailored on cognition and level of patient activation compared to usual care (UC) resulting in 8 study arms on the outcomes of health care utilization (HCU) and health outcomes: patient-reported health status, assessment of care for chronic conditions, and health related quality of life in adult patients with multiple chronic diseases dismissed to home from an acute care facility. Our working hypothesis is that patients in the HBCTI groups compared to the UC groups will have lower HCU and improved outcomes (patient-reported health status, assessment of care for chronic conditions, and health related quality of life).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 22, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 24, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 8, 2024
CompletedOctober 8, 2024
September 1, 2024
1.2 years
January 22, 2014
November 8, 2022
September 30, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Health Care Utilization
Patient report of number of Emergency Department Visits and number of re-admissions to the hospital within a 6 month time period was measured. Validation data was obtained from the clinical sites.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Pain Interference
6 months
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Functioning
6 months after intervention
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Satisfaction With Social Roles
6 months
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System- Anxiety
6 months
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Fatigue
6 months
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (8)
Grp 1a: Low Cognition, Low Activation
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will receive an 8 week care transition intervention with an Advanced Practice Registered Nurse-Nurse Practitioner (APRN-NP) and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). The APRN-NP will guide the care transition intervention. This group will receive the most intense intervention.
Grp 2a: Low Cognition, High Activation
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will receive an 8 week care transition intervention with an APRN-NP and CNA. The APRN-NP will guide the care transition intervention. This group will receive an intense intervention.
Grp 3a: Normal Cognition, Low Activation
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will receive an 4 week care transition intervention with a Registered Nurse (RN) Coach. This group will be evaluated at four weeks, if the patient activation levels are still low, they will be referred to the 4 week APRN-NP and CNA.
Grp 4a: Normal Cognition, High Activation
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will receive the least intensive intervention delivered by a RN coach.
Grp 1b: Low Cognition, Low Activation Usual Care
NO INTERVENTIONComparison group to 1a intervention group
Grp 2b Low Cognition, High Activation Usual Care
NO INTERVENTIONComparison group to 2a intervention group
Grp 3b: Normal Cognition, Low Activation Usual Care
NO INTERVENTIONComparison group to 3a intervention group
Grp 4b: Normal Cognition, High Activation Usual Care
NO INTERVENTIONComparison group to 4a intervention group
Interventions
The intervention is focused on knowledge, skills, confidence and creating a partnership with the health care provider. Education is provided at a 5th grade reading level. The "teach back" method is used to validate knowledge, skills and confidence. Once knowledge is validated, the interventions focused on motivation.
The intervention is focused on knowledge, skills, confidence and creating a partnership with the health care provider. Education is provided at a 5th grade reading level. The "teach back" method is used to validate knowledge, skills and confidence. Once knowledge is validated, the interventions focused on motivation and handling stressful situations.
The intervention is focused on knowledge, skills, confidence and creating a partnership with the health care provider. Education is provided for areas of misunderstanding. The "teach back" method is used to validate knowledge, skills and confidence. Interventions are focused on motivation and developing personal behavioral goals.
The intervention is focused on knowledge, skills, confidence and creating a partnership with the health care provider. Focus is on maintaining behaviors during hardship and stress. Empowering, motivating and validating are strategies utilized.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult Patients (age 19 and older) being discharged from the hospital with three or more chronic diseases;
- Have a score greater than 17 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (dementia);
- Reside within a 35 mile radius of Lincoln, Ne.; and
- Able to hear, speak and read English.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients will be excluded if they:
- have a terminal illness;
- have a score of less than 17 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (dementia);
- are under the care of The Physicians Network (TPN) at St. Elizabeth Regional Medical Center (SERMC).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Saint Elizabeth Regional Medical Center
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68510, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Lani Zimmerman
- Organization
- University of Nebraska Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lani M Zimmerman, PhD
University of Nebraska
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 22, 2014
First Posted
January 24, 2014
Study Start
October 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
October 8, 2024
Results First Posted
October 8, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share