COntinuous vs BOlus Nasogastric Feeding in Mechanically Ventilated Pediatric Patients 2
COBO2
1 other identifier
interventional
147
1 country
6
Brief Summary
This multi-center, prospective, randomized comparative effectiveness intervention study will evaluate continuous feeding (CGF) and bolus gastric feeding (BGF) protocols and their effect on delivery of prescribed nutrition and feeding intolerance in mechanically ventilated critically ill children for up through 12 hours post achievement goal feeds or exclusion from feeding protocol, whichever comes first, to a maximum of 10 days.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 24, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2018
CompletedJanuary 18, 2020
January 1, 2020
3.1 years
September 24, 2015
January 14, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to goal feeds (TTGF) is decreased in a bolus compared to continuous gastric feeding protocol.
TTGF defined as time to attain goal feeds
12 to 48 hours post enteral feeding
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Feeding interruptions
12 to 48 hours post enteral feeding
Gastric residual volumes
12 to 48 hours post enteral feeding
Rate of ventilator associated infections (VAI)
12 to 48 hours post enteral feeding
Oxygen Saturation Index
12 to 48 hours post enteral feeding
Emesis
12 to 48 hours post enteral feeding
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Continuous Gastric Feeding (CGF)
ACTIVE COMPARATORCGF group will have total daily enteral nutrition requirement delivered at a constant rate via infusion over the entire 24 hour period.
Bolus Gastric Feeding (BGF)
EXPERIMENTALBGF group will have total daily enteral nutrition requirement delivered in interval, finite volumes over the course of the 24 hour period.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- all medical patients hospitalized in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU)
- aged 1 month through 12 years of age
- mechanically ventilated within the first 24 hours of admission
- patients with an anticipated duration of mechanical ventilation greater than 48 hours
You may not qualify if:
- diagnosis of acute or chronic gastrointestinal pathology
- primary cardiac surgery or other surgical service patients
- enteral nutrition initiated greater than 48 hours post PICU admission, or
- enteral nutrition was initiated prior to admission to PICU
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
Shands Children's Hospital
Gainesville, Florida, 32608, United States
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756, United States
Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron
Akron, Ohio, 44308, United States
The Children's Hospital at Oklahoma University Medical Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73117, United States
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Children's Hospital of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226, United States
Related Publications (25)
Mehta NM, Bechard LJ, Cahill N, Wang M, Day A, Duggan CP, Heyland DK. Nutritional practices and their relationship to clinical outcomes in critically ill children--an international multicenter cohort study*. Crit Care Med. 2012 Jul;40(7):2204-11. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31824e18a8.
PMID: 22564954BACKGROUNDMikhailov TA, Kuhn EM, Manzi J, Christensen M, Collins M, Brown AM, Dechert R, Scanlon MC, Wakeham MK, Goday PS. Early enteral nutrition is associated with lower mortality in critically ill children. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2014 May;38(4):459-66. doi: 10.1177/0148607113517903. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
PMID: 24403379BACKGROUNDMehta NM, McAleer D, Hamilton S, Naples E, Leavitt K, Mitchell P, Duggan C. Challenges to optimal enteral nutrition in a multidisciplinary pediatric intensive care unit. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010 Jan-Feb;34(1):38-45. doi: 10.1177/0148607109348065. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
PMID: 19903872BACKGROUNDKhorasani EN, Mansouri F. Effect of early enteral nutrition on morbidity and mortality in children with burns. Burns. 2010 Nov;36(7):1067-71. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2009.12.005. Epub 2010 Apr 18.
PMID: 20403667BACKGROUNDSchindler CA, Mikhailov TA, Kuhn EM, Christopher J, Conway P, Ridling D, Scott AM, Simpson VS. Protecting fragile skin: nursing interventions to decrease development of pressure ulcers in pediatric intensive care. Am J Crit Care. 2011 Jan;20(1):26-34; quiz 35. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2011754.
PMID: 21196569BACKGROUNDLarsen BM, Goonewardene LA, Field CJ, Joffe AR, Van Aerde JE, Olstad DL, Clandinin MT. Low energy intakes are associated with adverse outcomes in infants after open heart surgery. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2013 Mar;37(2):254-60. doi: 10.1177/0148607112463075. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
PMID: 23064254BACKGROUNDMehta NM, Compher C; A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors. A.S.P.E.N. Clinical Guidelines: nutrition support of the critically ill child. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2009 May-Jun;33(3):260-76. doi: 10.1177/0148607109333114. No abstract available.
PMID: 19398612BACKGROUNDBrown A-M, Forbes ML, Vitale VS, Tirodker UH, Zeller R. Effects of a gastric feeding protocol on efficiency of enteral nutrition in critically ill infants and children. ICAN: Infant, Child, & Adolescent Nutrition. 2012;4(3):175-180.
BACKGROUNDTume L, Carter B, Latten L. A UK and Irish survey of enteral nutrition practices in paediatric intensive care units. Br J Nutr. 2013 Apr 14;109(7):1304-22. doi: 10.1017/S0007114512003042. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
PMID: 22853808BACKGROUNDMohr F, Steffen R. Physiology of gastrointestinal motility. In: Wyllie R, Hyams JS, Kay M, eds. Pediatric Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier/Saunders; 2011:39-49.
BACKGROUNDChen YC, Chou SS, Lin LH, Wu LF. The effect of intermittent nasogastric feeding on preventing aspiration pneumonia in ventilated critically ill patients. J Nurs Res. 2006 Sep;14(3):167-80. doi: 10.1097/01.jnr.0000387575.66598.2a.
PMID: 16967399BACKGROUNDLee JS, Auyeung TW. A comparison of two feeding methods in the alleviation of diarrhoea in older tube-fed patients: a randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing. 2003 Jul;32(4):388-93. doi: 10.1093/ageing/32.4.388.
PMID: 12851181BACKGROUNDLee JS, Kwok T, Chui PY, Ko FW, Lo WK, Kam WC, Mok HL, Lo R, Woo J. Can continuous pump feeding reduce the incidence of pneumonia in nasogastric tube-fed patients? A randomized controlled trial. Clin Nutr. 2010 Aug;29(4):453-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.10.003. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
PMID: 19910085BACKGROUNDHorn D, Chaboyer W. Gastric feeding in critically ill children: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Crit Care. 2003 Sep;12(5):461-8.
PMID: 14503430BACKGROUNDHurt RT, McClave SA. Gastric residual volumes in critical illness: what do they really mean? Crit Care Clin. 2010 Jul;26(3):481-90, viii-ix. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2010.04.010.
PMID: 20643301BACKGROUNDSkillman HE. Monitoring the efficacy of a PICU nutrition therapy protocol. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2011 Jul;35(4):445-6. doi: 10.1177/0148607111409046. Epub 2011 Jun 1. No abstract available.
PMID: 21632953BACKGROUNDReignier J, Mercier E, Le Gouge A, Boulain T, Desachy A, Bellec F, Clavel M, Frat JP, Plantefeve G, Quenot JP, Lascarrou JB; Clinical Research in Intensive Care and Sepsis (CRICS) Group. Effect of not monitoring residual gastric volume on risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults receiving mechanical ventilation and early enteral feeding: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2013 Jan 16;309(3):249-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.196377.
PMID: 23321763BACKGROUNDSkillman HE. How you can improve the delivery of enteral nutrition in your PICU. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010 Jan-Feb;34(1):99-100. doi: 10.1177/0148607109344725. No abstract available.
PMID: 20054060BACKGROUNDWeckwerth JA. Monitoring enteral nutrition support tolerance in infants and children. Nutr Clin Pract. 2004 Oct;19(5):496-503. doi: 10.1177/0115426504019005496.
PMID: 16215145BACKGROUNDHorn D, Chaboyer W, Schluter PJ. Gastric residual volumes in critically ill paediatric patients: a comparison of feeding regimens. Aust Crit Care. 2004 Aug;17(3):98-100, 102-3. doi: 10.1016/s1036-7314(04)80011-0.
PMID: 15493856BACKGROUNDCooper VB, Haut C. Preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia in children: an evidence-based protocol. Crit Care Nurse. 2013 Jun;33(3):21-9; quiz 30. doi: 10.4037/ccn2013204.
PMID: 23727849BACKGROUNDThomas NJ, Shaffer ML, Willson DF, Shih MC, Curley MA. Defining acute lung disease in children with the oxygenation saturation index. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010 Jan;11(1):12-7. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181b0653d.
PMID: 19561556BACKGROUNDPoulard F, Dimet J, Martin-Lefevre L, Bontemps F, Fiancette M, Clementi E, Lebert C, Renard B, Reignier J. Impact of not measuring residual gastric volume in mechanically ventilated patients receiving early enteral feeding: a prospective before-after study. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010 Mar-Apr;34(2):125-30. doi: 10.1177/0148607109344745. Epub 2009 Oct 27.
PMID: 19861528BACKGROUNDUkleja A. Altered GI motility in critically Ill patients: current understanding of pathophysiology, clinical impact, and diagnostic approach. Nutr Clin Pract. 2010 Feb;25(1):16-25. doi: 10.1177/0884533609357568.
PMID: 20130154BACKGROUNDBrown A-M. A Comparison of Two Gastric Feeding Approaches in Mechanically Ventilated Pediatric Patients. Akron, OH: The University of Akron; 2014:159.
BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ann-Marie Brown, PhD, CPNP
Akron Children's Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 24, 2015
First Posted
October 1, 2015
Study Start
November 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 1, 2018
Study Completion
December 1, 2018
Last Updated
January 18, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share