Standardizing Language in Laparoscopic Surgery
SLL
Does Standardizing Language in Laparoscopic Surgery Improve Efficiency? A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Obstetrics and Gynecology residents, fellows and attending physicians will be randomized to view one of two educational presentations of equal duration. The "intervention" presentation will demonstrate the use of a standardized language for effective communication of laparoscopy commands. Both groups will be asked to perform a simulated laparoscopic task. Participants will be timed and use of the standardized language will be tracked and tabulated. The primary outcome of interest is whether the use of standard commands during a simulated laparoscopic task is associated with sooner completion of the task. This may translate into improved efficiency in the operating room.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 30, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2016
CompletedFebruary 11, 2016
February 1, 2016
3 months
September 30, 2015
February 9, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Procedure Time
The simulated laparoscopic task will be timed from initiation to completion
Recorded once per simulated laparoscopic task upon completion (one visit)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Communication
Recorded during per simulated laparoscopic task (one visit)
Other Outcomes (1)
Post-Intervention Survey
After completion of simulated laparoscopic task (one visit)
Study Arms (2)
SLL Presentation
EXPERIMENTALIntervention: Standardized Language of Laparoscopy (SLL) Presentation and simulated laparoscopic task performed on a low-fidelity pelvis simulator Will witness a presentation on the use of a SLL for communication between the primary and assistant surgeons during laparoscopy as previously determined by a national survey of Canadian experts and a modified delphi technique.
Control Presentation
PLACEBO COMPARATORIntervention: Surgical Anatomy (SA) Presentation and simulated laparoscopic task performed on a low-fidelity pelvis simulator Will witness a presentation of similar duration as the intervention group on laparoscopy but not related to communication (laparoscopic anatomy). The simulated laparoscopic task will be identical to the SLL group.
Interventions
Educational presentation on the use of a standardized lexicon for communication between surgeon and assistant during laparoscopy
Educational presentation on relevant anatomy related to laparoscopy performed by a gynecologic surgeon.
Using a low-fidelity pelvis simulator and laparoscopic instruments, pairs of each arm will be asked to perform a laparoscopic task (maneuver a ball into a nylon surgical bag). Use of SLL will be tabulated and task will be timed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents OR fellows OR attending physicians
You may not qualify if:
- Physical disability preventing the candidate from performing laparoscopic surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Ottawa Skills and Simulation Centre
Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4E9, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Mehdizadeh, Mehra, et al. Standardizing Language in Laparoscopy: A Modified Delphi Approach. (Poster) AIME Day, The University of Ottawa, Canada
RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Glenn D Posner, MDCM, FRCSC
Medical Director of the University of Ottawa Skills and Simulation Centre
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr. Glenn D. Posner
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 30, 2015
First Posted
October 1, 2015
Study Start
March 1, 2016
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2016
Last Updated
February 11, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
IPD will not be shared, but will be available upon request as it will not contain any identifying data on the participant as determined through our institution's IRB.