NCT02562638

Brief Summary

Traditionally, patients are kept nil-per-os (NPO) or nil-by-mouth (NBM) prior to invasive cardiac procedures. There exists neither clear evidence nor guidance about the benefits of this. The investigators aim to assess if there is a reduced incidence of vasovagal complications (primary outcome) and the combined incidence of aspiration pneumonia, change in eGFR, participant satisfaction if participants are not kept fasting. This (pilot) randomised control trial will have an intervention arm allowing participants to drink clear liquids freely up to 1 hour before the procedure versus keeping them traditionally NPO. 240 patients will be randomised with 120 participants in each arm.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
240

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2015

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 14, 2015

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 29, 2015

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

October 8, 2015

Status Verified

October 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

September 14, 2015

Last Update Submit

October 7, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

NPONBMpre-procedurecardiac

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Primary: Reduction in the incidence of vasovagal complications.

    The presence of two or more of the following during the cardiac invasive procedure or during sheath removal or while manual pressure is being applied to the site will constitute a positive vasovagal reaction : i) Reduced level of consciousness, nausea and vomiting, and cold, clammy, pale skin ii) Reduction in blood pressure to \< 100mmHg systolic or \> 15% decrease from baseline iii) Reduction in the heart rate to \< 60 beats/minute (or if initial heart rate is \< 60/minute, a decrease of \> 15% from baseline). Patients' heart rate and blood pressure will be monitored (continuously) intra-procedure and (every 15 minutes) post-procedure during sheath removal and while manual pressure is being applied. The expected rate of vasovagal reaction in the NPO group is 3% .

    1 day

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Secondary: 1. Patient satisfaction with procedure as assessed by the patient satisfaction survey form.

    1 day

  • Secondary: 2. Overall incidence of aspiration pneumonia (intra and post-procedural).

    1 week post procedure

  • Secondary: 3. Post-procedure change serum creatinine (∆creatinine) compared to pre-procedure.

    5 days post procedure

  • Secondary: 4. Post-procedure change eGFR (∆eGFR) compared to pre-procedure.

    5 days post procedure

  • Secondary: 5. Volume of gastric content immediately prior to the cardiac intervention

    1 day

Study Arms (2)

Group 1 Fasting

NO INTERVENTION

Group 1(control group) Fasting for both solids and fluids for up to 4 hours pre-procedure

Group 2 Non-fasting

EXPERIMENTAL

Group 2 (intervention arm) Clear fluids up to 1 hour before the procedure and fasting for solids up to 4 hours pre-procedure

Other: Non-fasting

Interventions

Clear fluids up to 1hour pre-procedure and fasting for solids for up to 4 hours

Group 2 Non-fasting

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Ability to give written informed consent
  • Diagnostic coronary angiography and coronary interventions (both elective and stable Acute Coronary Syndrome {ACS} patients).
  • ≥ 18 years of age

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who are intubated
  • Patients unable to give informed consent
  • Patients presenting with an acute unstable condition, including:
  • STEMI
  • unstable ACS
  • Patients with a history of or at risk for aspiration pneumonia
  • stroke
  • dysphagia
  • severe gastroesophageal reflux disease
  • Patients with known or anticipated difficult airway
  • Patients who request to be allotted to a particular arm of the study
  • Patients who are temporary transfers from other hospitals

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (35)

  • Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration: application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologist Task Force on Preoperative Fasting. Anesthesiology. 1999 Mar;90(3):896-905. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199903000-00034. No abstract available.

    PMID: 10078693BACKGROUND
  • Rosengarten J, Ozkor M, Knight C: Fasting and cardiac catheterization should we be following the evidence; Controversies and consensus in imaging and intervention (C2I2) 2007: V (2); 22-23

    BACKGROUND
  • Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, Chambers CE, Ellis SG, Guyton RA, Hollenberg SM, Khot UN, Lange RA, Mauri L, Mehran R, Moussa ID, Mukherjee D, Nallamothu BK, Ting HH; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Dec 6;58(24):e44-122. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.007. Epub 2011 Nov 7. No abstract available.

    PMID: 22070834BACKGROUND
  • Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS); European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI); Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, Di Mario C, Falk V, Folliguet T, Garg S, Huber K, James S, Knuuti J, Lopez-Sendon J, Marco J, Menicanti L, Ostojic M, Piepoli MF, Pirlet C, Pomar JL, Reifart N, Ribichini FL, Schalij MJ, Sergeant P, Serruys PW, Silber S, Sousa Uva M, Taggart D. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2010 Oct;31(20):2501-55. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq277. Epub 2010 Aug 29. No abstract available.

    PMID: 20802248BACKGROUND
  • Williams DO, Holubkov R, Yeh W, Bourassa MG, Al-Bassam M, Block PC, Coady P, Cohen H, Cowley M, Dorros G, Faxon D, Holmes DR, Jacobs A, Kelsey SF, King SB 3rd, Myler R, Slater J, Stanek V, Vlachos HA, Detre KM. Percutaneous coronary intervention in the current era compared with 1985-1986: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Registries. Circulation. 2000 Dec 12;102(24):2945-51. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.24.2945.

    PMID: 11113044BACKGROUND
  • Grayson AD, Moore RK, Jackson M, Rathore S, Sastry S, Gray TP, Schofield I, Chauhan A, Ordoubadi FF, Prendergast B, Stables RH; North West Quality Improvement Programme in Cardiac Interventions. Multivariate prediction of major adverse cardiac events after 9914 percutaneous coronary interventions in the north west of England. Heart. 2006 May;92(5):658-63. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.066415. Epub 2005 Sep 13.

    PMID: 16159983BACKGROUND
  • Webb JG, Solankhi NK, Chugh SK, Amin H, Buller CE, Ricci DR, Humphries K, Penn IM, Carere R. Incidence, correlates, and outcome of cardiac arrest associated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2002 Dec 1;90(11):1252-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02846-1. No abstract available.

    PMID: 12450610BACKGROUND
  • Nagel EL, Fine EG, Krischer JP, Davis JH. Complications of CPR. Crit Care Med. 1981 May;9(5):424. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198105000-00037. No abstract available.

    PMID: 7214982BACKGROUND
  • Wharton TP Jr. Should patients with acute myocardial infraction be transferred to a tertiary center for primary angioplasty or receive it at qualified hospitals in community? The case for community hospital angioplasty. Circulation. 2005 Nov 29;112(22):3509-20; discussion 3534. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.478362. No abstract available.

    PMID: 16316972BACKGROUND
  • Warner MA, Warner ME, Weber JG. Clinical significance of pulmonary aspiration during the perioperative period. Anesthesiology. 1993 Jan;78(1):56-62. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199301000-00010.

    PMID: 8424572BACKGROUND
  • Wright SW, Chudnofsky CR, Dronen SC, Kothari R, Birrer P, Blanton DM, Bruner A. Comparison of midazolam and diazepam for conscious sedation in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1993 Feb;22(2):201-5. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)80203-3.

    PMID: 8427432BACKGROUND
  • Chan KLL. Etomidate and midazolam for procedural sedation in the emergency department of Queen Elizabeth Hospital: a randomised controlled trial. Hong Kong J Emerg Med 2008; 15: 75-87.

    BACKGROUND
  • Dunn T, Mossop D, Newton A, Gammon A. Propofol for procedural sedation in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2007 Jul;24(7):459-61. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.046714.

    PMID: 17582032BACKGROUND
  • Brady M, Kinn S, Stuart P. Preoperative fasting for adults to prevent perioperative complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(4):CD004423. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004423.

    PMID: 14584013BACKGROUND
  • Thorpe RJ, Benger J. Pre-procedural fasting in emergency sedation. Emerg Med J. 2010 Apr;27(4):254-61. doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.069120.

    PMID: 20385672BACKGROUND
  • Taylor DM, Bell A, Holdgate A, MacBean C, Huynh T, Thom O, Augello M, Millar R, Day R, Williams A, Ritchie P, Pasco J. Risk factors for sedation-related events during procedural sedation in the emergency department. Emerg Med Australas. 2011 Aug;23(4):466-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01419.x. Epub 2011 May 17.

    PMID: 21824314BACKGROUND
  • Maltby JR, Sutherland AD, Sale JP, Shaffer EA. Preoperative oral fluids: is a five-hour fast justified prior to elective surgery? Anesth Analg. 1986 Nov;65(11):1112-6.

    PMID: 3767008BACKGROUND
  • Phillips S, Hutchinson S, Davidson T. Preoperative drinking does not affect gastric contents. Br J Anaesth. 1993 Jan;70(1):6-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/70.1.6.

    PMID: 8431336BACKGROUND
  • Soreide E, Eriksson LI, Hirlekar G, Eriksson H, Henneberg SW, Sandin R, Raeder J; (Task Force on Scandinavian Pre-operative Fasting Guidelines, Clinical Practice Committee Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine). Pre-operative fasting guidelines: an update. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Sep;49(8):1041-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00781.x.

    PMID: 16095440BACKGROUND
  • Hausel J, Nygren J, Lagerkranser M, Hellstrom PM, Hammarqvist F, Almstrom C, Lindh A, Thorell A, Ljungqvist O. A carbohydrate-rich drink reduces preoperative discomfort in elective surgery patients. Anesth Analg. 2001 Nov;93(5):1344-50. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200111000-00063.

    PMID: 11682427BACKGROUND
  • McCullough PA, Wolyn R, Rocher LL, Levin RN, O'Neill WW. Acute renal failure after coronary intervention: incidence, risk factors, and relationship to mortality. Am J Med. 1997 Nov;103(5):368-75. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)00150-2.

    PMID: 9375704BACKGROUND
  • Hiremath S, Akbari A, Shabana W, Fergusson DA, Knoll GA. Prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury: is simple oral hydration similar to intravenous? A systematic review of the evidence. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e60009. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060009. Epub 2013 Mar 26.

    PMID: 23555863BACKGROUND
  • Agrawal D, Manzi SF, Gupta R, Krauss B. Preprocedural fasting state and adverse events in children undergoing procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Nov;42(5):636-46. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(03)00516-x.

    PMID: 14581915BACKGROUND
  • Godwin SA, Burton JH, Gerardo CJ, Hatten BW, Mace SE, Silvers SM, Fesmire FM; American College of Emergency Physicians. Clinical policy: procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Feb;63(2):247-58.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.10.015.

    PMID: 24438649BACKGROUND
  • Hamid T, Aleem Q, Lau Y, Singh R, McDonald J, Macdonald JE, Sastry S, Arya S, Bainbridge A, Mudawi T, Balachandran K. Pre-procedural fasting for coronary interventions: is it time to change practice? Heart. 2014 Apr;100(8):658-61. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-305289. Epub 2014 Feb 12.

    PMID: 24522621BACKGROUND
  • MENDELSON CL. The aspiration of stomach contents into the lungs during obstetric anesthesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1946 Aug;52:191-205. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)39829-5. No abstract available.

    PMID: 20993766BACKGROUND
  • Dharma S, Shah S, Radadiya R, Vyas C, Pancholy S, Patel T. Nitroglycerin plus diltiazem versus nitroglycerin alone for spasm prophylaxis with transradial approach. J Invasive Cardiol. 2012 Mar;24(3):122-5.

    PMID: 22388304BACKGROUND
  • Epstein SE, Stampfer M, Beiser GD. Role of the capacitance and resistance vessels in vasovagal syncope. Circulation. 1968 Apr;37(4):524-33. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.37.4.524. No abstract available.

    PMID: 5649078BACKGROUND
  • Sander-Jensen K, Secher NH, Bie P, Warberg J, Schwartz TW. Vagal slowing of the heart during haemorrhage: observations from 20 consecutive hypotensive patients. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Feb 8;292(6517):364-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6517.364.

    PMID: 3080172BACKGROUND
  • S. B. Hulley, S. R. Cummings, W. S. Browner, et al: Designing Clinical Research: Fourth Edition, LWW, 2013.

    BACKGROUND
  • Mehran R, Aymong ED, Nikolsky E, Lasic Z, Iakovou I, Fahy M, Mintz GS, Lansky AJ, Moses JW, Stone GW, Leon MB, Dangas G. A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Oct 6;44(7):1393-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.068.

    PMID: 15464318BACKGROUND
  • Perlas A, Mitsakakis N, Liu L, Cino M, Haldipur N, Davis L, Cubillos J, Chan V. Validation of a mathematical model for ultrasound assessment of gastric volume by gastroscopic examination. Anesth Analg. 2013 Feb;116(2):357-63. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318274fc19. Epub 2013 Jan 9.

    PMID: 23302981BACKGROUND
  • Cubillos J, Tse C, Chan VW, Perlas A. Bedside ultrasound assessment of gastric content: an observational study. Can J Anaesth. 2012 Apr;59(4):416-23. doi: 10.1007/s12630-011-9661-9. Epub 2012 Jan 4.

    PMID: 22215523BACKGROUND
  • Perlas A, Van de Putte P, Van Houwe P, Chan VW. I-AIM framework for point-of-care gastric ultrasound. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jan;116(1):7-11. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev113. Epub 2015 May 7. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25951832BACKGROUND
  • Kruisselbrink R, Arzola C, Endersby R, Tse C, Chan V, Perlas A. Intra- and interrater reliability of ultrasound assessment of gastric volume. Anesthesiology. 2014 Jul;121(1):46-51. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000193.

    PMID: 24595113BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fasting

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Feeding BehaviorBehavior

Study Officials

  • Vladimir Dzavik

    University Health Network, Toronto

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Vladimir Dzavik, MD,FRCPC

CONTACT

Christopher B Overgaard, MD,MSc,FRCPC

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2015

First Posted

September 29, 2015

Study Start

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion

December 1, 2015

Study Completion

December 1, 2015

Last Updated

October 8, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-10