Evaluating Use of a Farmers Market Incentive Program Among Low-Income Health Center Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
177
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of a brief clinic-based educational intervention on utilization of Double Up Food Bucks (DUFB)-a Michigan-wide Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) healthy food incentive--among low income health center patients at a community health center in Southeast Michigan.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 4, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 24, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2015
CompletedDecember 28, 2015
December 1, 2015
1.2 years
September 4, 2015
December 24, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Prevalence of participant DUFB use over time, as assessed by an interviewer-administered survey using structured open-ended questions
Use of DUFB at baseline assessed with yes/no response. At each of the the 3 follow-up surveys waves (1.5 months, 3 months, and 5 months), participants will be asked if they have used DUFB in the past month (yes/no), and if yes, how many times.
5 months
Participant-perceived barriers and facilitators to DUFB use following educational intervention, as assessed by an interviewer-administered survey using structured open-ended questions and semi-structured focus group questions
Through an iterative process, three team members will independently conduct thematic analyses, compared codes, resolve discrepancies, and summarize key thematic findings.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline fruit and vegetable consumption at 1.5 months, 3 months, and 5 months, as assessed by a validated 2 question fruit and vegetable screener
baseline, 1.5 months, 3 months, 5 months
Study Arms (1)
Double Up Food Bucks
EXPERIMENTALClinic-based educational intervention about an existing SNAP healthy food incentive program, as well as a $10 voucher to spend on produce at farmers markets
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patient or family member of patient
- at least 18 years of age
- currently SNAP-enrolled
- identifies as one of primary food shoppers for household
- English or Spanish-speaking
You may not qualify if:
- under 18
- not currently SNAP-enrolled
- not one of primary food shoppers for household
- unable to complete a telephone survey in English or Spanish
- unable to provide a working telephone number where they could be contacted
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Michiganlead
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Ypsilanti Health Center, University of Michigan
Ypsilanti, Michigan, 48198, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alicia Cohen, MD
University of Michigan
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Lecturer, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholar
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 4, 2015
First Posted
September 24, 2015
Study Start
August 1, 2014
Primary Completion
October 1, 2015
Study Completion
October 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 28, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-12