Efficacy and Tolerance Comparison Between Subconjunctival Injection of Triamcinolone and Intravitreal Implant of Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Inflammatory Macular Edema
TRIOZ
1 other identifier
interventional
114
1 country
16
Brief Summary
Corticosteroids, whether injected peri- or intra-ocularly, remain indispensable tools of the therapeutic arsenal in treating inflammatory macular edema. However, a few years ago, only triamcinolone acetonide was available to ophthalmologists. This molecule, developed initially for rheumatological or dermatological use, has been increasingly deployed in ophthalmology, while still off-label. In 2011, the delivery system of dexamethasone from biodegradable and injectable implant into the vitreous cavity obtained the label for inflammatory macular edema. This protocol is therefore designed to compare the efficacy and safety of peri- and intra-ocular injections of corticosteroids in the treatment of inflammatory macular edema.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Jan 2016
Longer than P75 for phase_3
16 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 29, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 22, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 15, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 15, 2021
CompletedSeptember 7, 2022
October 1, 2020
5.1 years
May 29, 2015
September 5, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evaluation of the effectiveness of a subconjunctival injection of triamcinolone on reducing the central macular thickness versus an intravitreal implant of dexamethasone between patient selection and 2 months after treatment
Difference of the central macular thickness in the treated eye, measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) spectral domain, for each patient between patient selection and 2 months after treatment
At 2 months after treatment
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Evaluation of the experience of the injection by a questionnaire (tolerable, unpleasant and very unpleasant) and by EVA (0 cm = no pain to 10 cm = extreme pain)
At day 0 (= the day of the treatment)
Evaluation of the effectiveness of the studied injection at each visit regarding gain in visual acuity (ETDRS)
Up to 6 months
Evaluation of the effectiveness of the studied injection at each visit regarding reduction of the anterior flare
Up to 6 months
Evaluation of the effectiveness of the studied injection at each visit regarding reduction of the vitreous haze
Up to 6 months
Evaluation of the effectiveness of the studied injection at each visit regarding central macular thickness measured by OCT, allowing the evaluation of the duration of action of the treatment
Up to 6 months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Reference Drug
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntravitreal implant of 700μg of dexamethasone (Ozurdex®)
Tested Drug
EXPERIMENTALSubconjunctival injection of 16 mg triamcinolone (Kénacort Retard®)
Interventions
Subconjunctival injection at 4 mm from the limbus at 6 o'clock
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient, male or female (under effective contraception if premenopausal) over 18 years old
- Patient affiliated with a social security plan
- Patient able to understand and follow the instructions of the study
- Patient having signed an informed consent
- Patient having a central macular thickness greater than 320μm (Spectral Domain, 270µm Time Domain)
- Patient with an inflammatory macular edema, unilateral or bilateral (in the case of a bilateral inflammatory macular edema, the eye most affected will be treated)
You may not qualify if:
- Patient with an infectious uveitis
- Patient with uncontrolled active infection
- Patient receiving an unbalanced general anti-inflammatory and/or immunosuppressive and/or immunomodulatory therapy (recent modification \<1 month)
- Patient having a history of glaucoma and/or ocular hypertension in the eye studied (intraocular pressure (IOP) \> 25 mmHg without antiglaucoma medication or \> 21 mmHg with antiglaucoma combination therapy) and/or cortisone-causing-hypertension not controlled by an antiglaucoma dual therapy
- Patient with uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c\> 8%) or unbalanced hypertension (Systolic Blood Pressure \> 160 mmHg and/or Diastolic Blood Pressure \> 100mmHg)
- Edematous diabetic maculopathy
- Patient who had received triamcinolone (subconjunctivally or sub-tenon) 3 months before randomization, or 700μg dexamethasone intravitreally 6 months before randomization
- Suspected or active ocular or periocular infection, including most viral diseases of the cornea and conjunctiva, such as active epithelial keratitis with herpes simplex (dendritic keratitis), vaccinia, varicella, mycobacterial infections and mycoses
- History of ocular herpes infection or central serous chorioretinopathy
- Aphakic eye with rupture of the posterior lens capsule
- Eye with implant in the anterior chamber, iris- or transscleral-fixated intraocular implant and rupture of the posterior lens capsule
- Uncontrolled systemic inflammatory disease.
- Known hypersensitivity to the active substance or to one of the excipients of Ozurdex®, Kenacort® or injectable fluorescein
- Pregnant woman or likely to become pregnant or nursing
- Patient participating in another clinical trial
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (16)
CHU Angers
Angers, France
CHU de Bordeaux
Bordeaux, 33076, France
CHU de Brest
Brest, 29609, France
CHU de Dijon
Dijon, 21079, France
CHU de Grenoble
La Tronche, 38700, France
Hôpital Bicêtre (AP-HP)
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94270, France
CHRU de Lille
Lille, 59037, France
Hopices Civils de Lyon
Lyon, 69004, France
CHU de Montpellier
Montpellier, 34295, France
CHU de Nantes
Nantes, 44093, France
CHU de Nice
Nice, 06000, France
Hôpital La Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP)
Paris, 75013, France
Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild
Paris, 75019, France
Centre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts
Paris, 75571, France
CHU de Tours
Tours, 37044, France
CHU de Nancy
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54500, France
Related Publications (1)
Couret C, Poinas A, Volteau C, Riche VP, Le Lez ML, Errera MH, Creuzot-Garcher C, Baillif S, Kodjikian L, Ivan C, Le Jumeau de Kergaradec LM, Chiffoleau A, Jobert A, Jaulin J, Biron L, Hervouet E, Weber M. Comparison of two techniques used in routine care for the treatment of inflammatory macular oedema, subconjunctival triamcinolone injection and intravitreal dexamethasone implant: medical and economic importance of this randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020 Feb 10;21(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4066-0.
PMID: 32041669DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 29, 2015
First Posted
September 22, 2015
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion
February 15, 2021
Study Completion
February 15, 2021
Last Updated
September 7, 2022
Record last verified: 2020-10