Evaluation of Maintaining Visual Performance in Participants Who Engage in Electronic Visual Tasking While Using Restasis®
EMPOWER
1 other identifier
interventional
51
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This study will evaluate the efficacy of Restasis® in participants with dry eye disease who engage in electronic visual tasking.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jul 2015
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 21, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 17, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 21, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 24, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 24, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 1, 2017
CompletedJune 1, 2017
May 1, 2017
8 months
September 17, 2015
March 24, 2017
May 25, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Change From Baseline in the Total Corneal Staining Score With Fluorescein in the Worse Eye
Total corneal staining with fluorescein was measured in the worse eye using the Ora Calibra™ (Scale 1.0) 5-point scale where 0= none (best), no staining to 4=severe staining (worst). The sum of the total includes 3 regions of the cornea, resulting in a maximum possible score of 12 (severe staining score of 4 in all three regions). The worse eye is defined as the worst eye at Baseline. A negative change from Baseline represents a decrease in staining (improvement).
Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in the Total Conjunctival Staining Score With Fluorescein in the Worse Eye
Total conjunctival staining with fluorescein was measured in the worse eye using the Ora Calibra™ (Scale 1.0) 5-point scale where 0= none (best), no staining to 4=severe staining (worst). The sum of the total includes 2 regions of the conjunctiva, resulting in a maximum possible score of 8 (severe staining score of 4 in both regions). The worse eye is defined as the worst eye at Baseline. A negative change from Baseline represents a decrease in staining (improvement).
Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in the Central Region Staining Score With Fluorescein in the Worse Eye
Staining with fluorescein in the central region of the eye was measured in the worse eye using the Ora Calibra™ (Scale 1.0) 5-point scale where 0= none (best), no staining to 4=severe staining (worst). The worse eye is defined as the worst eye at Baseline. A negative change from Baseline represents a decrease in staining (improvement).
Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in the Total Corneal Staining Score With Lissamine Green in the Worse Eye
Total corneal staining with lissamine green was measured in the worse eye using the Ora Calibra™ (Scale 1.0) 5-point scale where 0= none (best), no staining to 4=severe staining (worst). The sum of the total includes 3 regions of the cornea, resulting in a maximum possible score of 12 (severe staining score of 4 in all three regions). The worse eye is defined as the worst eye at Baseline. A negative change from Baseline represents a decrease in staining (improvement).
Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in the Total Conjunctival Staining Score With Lissamine Green in the Worse Eye
Total conjunctival staining with lissamine green was measured in the worse eye using the Ora Calibra™ (Scale 1.0) 5-point scale where 0= none (best), no staining to 4=severe staining (worst). The sum of the total includes 2 regions of the conjunctiva, resulting in a maximum possible score of 8 (severe staining score of 4 in both regions). The worse eye is defined as the worst eye at Baseline. A negative change from Baseline represents a decrease in staining (improvement).
Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in the Central Region Staining Score With Lissamine Green in the Worse Eye
Staining with lissamine green in the central region of the eye was measured in the worse eye using the Ora Calibra™ (Scale 1.0) 5-point scale where 0= none (best), no staining to 4=severe staining (worst). The worse eye is defined as the worst eye at Baseline. A negative change from Baseline represents a decrease in staining (improvement).
Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Font Size
The minimum font (letter) size read correctly was assessed. Smaller font size (less points) indicates better ability. A negative change from Baseline indicates an improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening.
Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Words Read Incorrectly
The numbers of words read incorrectly are counted. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening (more words read incorrectly) and a negative change from Baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Time to Read Passage
The time to read passage (selected portion of text ) in seconds was assessed. A negative change from Baseline indicates an improvement (less time to read the passage).
Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Reading Rate
Reading speed was assessed as the number of words read correctly calculated as words/minute. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement (more words read correctly/minute) and a negative change from Baseline indicates a worsening (less words read correctly/minute).
Baseline, Month 6
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Change From Baseline in Tear Film Break Up Time (TFBUT) in the Worse Eye
Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Ocular Protection Index (OPI) 2.0 in the Worse Eye
Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Interblink Interval (IBI) in the Worst Eye
Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in OSDI© Total Score
Baseline, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Driving at Night on the OSDI©
Baseline, Month 6
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
RESTASIS®
EXPERIMENTAL1 drop of RESTASIS® ophthalmic emulsion instilled in each eye twice a day for 6 months.
Interventions
Cyclosporine 0.05% Ophthalmic Emulsion (RESTASIS®) 1 drop instilled in each eye twice a day.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Has Eye Symptoms when using video display terminals
- Has a reported history of dry eye in both eyes.
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosed with eye infection or active inflammation.
- Has worn contact lenses within the past 7 days or anticipated use during the study.
- Has used any eye drops within 2 hours.
- Has had laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) within 12 months.
- Has used Restasis® within 90 days.
- Has had any eye and or/lid surgeries within 6 months.
- Has had cataract surgery in either eye.
- Has current punctal occlusion or anticipate a change in punctal occlusion status at any point during the study.
- Is currently taking any topical ophthalmic prescriptions or over-the-counter solutions, artificial tears, gels or lid scrubs that cannot be discontinued for the trial duration.
- Use of medication known to cause ocular drying that is not on a stable dose for at least 30 days.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Allerganlead
Study Sites (2)
Andover Eye Associates, Inc
Andover, Massachusetts, 01810, United States
Total Eye Care, PA
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Vice President Medical Affairs,
- Organization
- Allergan, Inc
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jai Parekh
Allergan
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 17, 2015
First Posted
September 21, 2015
Study Start
July 21, 2015
Primary Completion
March 24, 2016
Study Completion
March 24, 2016
Last Updated
June 1, 2017
Results First Posted
June 1, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-05