NCT02121847

Brief Summary

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion (Restasis®) in patients with dry eye disease.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2014

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 3, 2014

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 22, 2014

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 24, 2014

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 23, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 23, 2014

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 25, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

April 18, 2019

Status Verified

April 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

April 22, 2014

Results QC Date

December 7, 2015

Last Update Submit

April 9, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (11)

  • Change From Baseline in Total Corneal Staining Score With Fluorescein in the Worse Eye

    Total corneal staining with fluorescein is measured in the worse eye utilizing the Ora CalibraTM Corneal Flourescein Staining Scale (0 to 4 scale where 0=no staining and 4= severe staining). The sum of the total includes 3 regions of the cornea, resulting in a maximum possible score of 12 (severe staining score of 4 in all three regions). A negative change from baseline represents a decrease in staining (improvement). A positive change from baseline represents an increase in staining (worsening).

    Baseline, Month 6

  • Change From Baseline in Total Conjunctival Staining Score With Fluorescein in the Worse Eye

    Total conjunctival staining with fluorescein is measured in the worse eye utilizing the Ora CalibraTM Conjunctiva Flourescein Staining Scale (0 to 4 scale where 0=no staining and 4= severe staining). The sum of the total includes 2 regions of the conjunctiva, resulting in a maximum possible score of 8 (severe staining score of 4 in both regions). A negative change from baseline represents a decrease in staining (improvement). A positive change from baseline represents an increase in staining (worsening).

    Baseline, Month 6

  • Change From Baseline in Total Corneal Staining Score With Lissamine Green in the Worse Eye

    Total corneal staining with lissamine green is measured in the worse eye utilizing the Ora CalibraTM Corneal Lissamine Staining Scale (0 to 4 scale where 0=no staining and 4= severe staining). The sum of the total includes 3 regions of the cornea, resulting in a maximum possible score of 12 (severe staining score of 4 in all three regions). A negative change from baseline represents a decrease in staining (improvement). A positive change from baseline represents an increase in staining (worsening).

    Baseline, Month 6

  • Change From Baseline in Total Conjunctival Staining Score With Lissamine Green in the Worse Eye

    Total conjunctival staining with lissamine is measured in the worse eye utilizing the Ora CalibraTM Conjunctiva Lissamine Staining Scale (0 to 4 scale where 0=no staining and 4= severe staining). The sum of the total includes 2 regions of the conjunctiva, resulting in a maximum possible score of 8 (severe staining score of 4 in both regions). A negative change from baseline represents a decrease in staining (improvement). A positive change from baseline represents an increase in staining (worsening).

    Baseline, Month 6

  • Change From Baseline in Reading on the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)

    The OSDI consists of 12 questions measuring the presence of ocular symptoms. The reading question is assessed using a 5-point scale (0=none of the time; 4=all of the time). The reading score is converted to a 0-100 score where 0 is best and 100 is worst. Higher OSDI reading scores are associated with greater severity. A negative number change from baseline indicates improvement and a positive number change from baseline indicates worsening.

    Baseline, Month 6

  • Change From Baseline in Driving at Night on the OSDI

    The OSDI consists of 12 questions measuring the presence of ocular symptoms. The driving at night question is assessed using a 5-point scale (0=none of the time; 4=all of the time). The driving at night score is converted to a 0-100 score where 0 is best and 100 is worst. Higher OSDI reading scores are associated with greater severity. A negative number change from baseline indicates improvement and a positive number change from baseline indicates worsening.

    Baseline, Month 6

  • Change From Baseline in Working With a Computer or Bank Machine on the OSDI

    The OSDI consists of 12 questions measuring the presence of ocular symptoms. The working with a computer or bank machine question is assessed using a 5-point scale (0=none of the time; 4=all of the time). The working with a computer or bank machine score is converted to a 0-100 score where 0 is best and 100 is worst. Higher OSDI reading scores are associated with greater severity. A negative number change from baseline indicates improvement and a positive number change from baseline indicates worsening.

    Baseline, Month 6

  • Change From Baseline in Watching TV on the OSDI

    The OSDI consists of 12 questions measuring the presence of ocular symptoms. The watching TV question is assessed using a 5-point scale (0=none of the time; 4=all of the time). The watching TV score is converted to a 0-100 score where 0 is best and 100 is worst. Higher OSDI reading scores are associated with greater severity. A negative number change from baseline indicates improvement and a positive number change from baseline indicates worsening.

    Baseline, Month 6

  • Change From Baseline in Reading Rate

    Reading speed is assessed as the number of words read correctly in 2 minutes.

    Baseline, Month 6

  • Change From Baseline in Words Read Incorrectly

    The numbers of words read incorrectly are counted in 2 minutes. A positive change from baseline indicates a worsening, and a negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.

    Baseline, Month 6

  • Change From Baseline in Font Size

    The minimum font (letter) size read correctly is assessed. Smaller font size indicates better ability. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive change from baseline indicates a worsening.

    Baseline, Month 6

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Change From Baseline in OSDI

    Baseline, Month 6

  • Change From Baseline in Ocular Discomfort on a 4-point Scale

    Baseline, Month 6

  • Change From Baseline in Tear Film Break-up Time in the Worse Eye

    Baseline, Month 6

  • Change From Baseline in the Interblink Interval in the Worse Eye

    Baseline, Month 6

  • Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Redness in the Worse Eye

    Baseline, Month 6

Study Arms (1)

cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion

EXPERIMENTAL

Cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion (Restasis®) eye drops administered twice daily and carboxymethylcellulose-based lubricant eye drops (Refresh OPTIVE® Advanced) administered as needed for 6 months.

Drug: cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic emulsionDrug: carboxymethylcellulose-based lubricant eye drops

Interventions

Cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion (Restasis®) eye drops administered twice daily for 6 months.

Also known as: Restasis®
cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion

Carboxymethylcellulose-based lubricant eye drops (Refresh OPTIVE® Advanced) administered as needed for 6 months.

Also known as: Refresh OPTIVE® Advanced
cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • History of dry eye in both eyes
  • Willing to use eye drops for dry eye symptoms

You may not qualify if:

  • Anticipate wearing contact lenses during the study
  • Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery within the past 12 months
  • Any ocular and/or lid surgeries within the past 6 months
  • Cataract surgery in either eye
  • Current or anticipated use of temporary punctal plugs during the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Unknown Facility

Andover, Massachusetts, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Stonecipher KG, Torkildsen GL, Ousler GW 3rd, Morris S, Villanueva L, Hollander DA. The IMPACT study: a prospective evaluation of the effects of cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% on ocular surface staining and visual performance in patients with dry eye. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016 May 13;10:887-95. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S101627. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 27257373BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye Syndromes

Interventions

CyclosporineCyclosporins

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lacrimal Apparatus DiseasesEye Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Peptides, CyclicMacrocyclic CompoundsPolycyclic CompoundsPeptidesAmino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins

Results Point of Contact

Title
Vice President Medical Affairs,
Organization
Allergan, Inc

Study Officials

  • Medical Director

    Allergan

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2014

First Posted

April 24, 2014

Study Start

April 3, 2014

Primary Completion

September 23, 2014

Study Completion

September 23, 2014

Last Updated

April 18, 2019

Results First Posted

April 25, 2016

Record last verified: 2019-04

Locations