NCT02553681

Brief Summary

This will be an up to six months, subject-masked, contralateral, parallel-group, randomised, daily wear study. All subjects will wear the Test lens in one eye and the Control lens in the other eye. Data from the first four weeks of Test and Control lens exposure will be used for the FDA 510 (k) submission.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
45

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2015

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2015

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 22, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 17, 2015

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2017

Completed
15 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 16, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

August 12, 2020

Status Verified

August 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

July 22, 2015

Last Update Submit

August 10, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • questionnaire addressing subjective comfort and wear time

    Subjects rated on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 was 'poor' and 10 was 'excellent'.

    subjects will be followed-up for one month

  • conjunctival redness - ocular biomicroscopy

    Graded based on a grading scale which ranged from 0 to 4, where 0 is none, 1 is trace, 2 is mild, 3 is moderate and 4 is severe.

    subjects will be followed-up for one month

  • corneal staining - ocular biomicroscopy

    Graded based on a grading scale which ranged from 0 to 4, where 0 is none, 1 is trace, 2 is mild, 3 is moderate and 4 is severe.

    subjects will be followed-up for one month

Study Arms (2)

HPT treated

EXPERIMENTAL

Hydra-PEG Treatment (HPT) treated RGP contact lenses made from roflufocon D

Device: roflufocon D contact lenses

untreated

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

untreated RGP contact lenses made from roflufocon D

Device: RGP contact lenses made from roflufocon D

Interventions

HPT treated rigid contact lenses

HPT treated

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Willing and able to sign the informed consent form
  • Aged ≥18 years old
  • Experienced wearer of rigid gas permeable contact lenses
  • Subject's habitual contact lenses must be made of Contamac's Optimum Extra (roflufocon D) material
  • Subjects must have owned spectacles or contact lenses prior to enrolment for this trial
  • Spherical power between -10.00 D and +10.00 D (at vertex distance 0 mm)
  • Corneal astigmatism ≤2.00 D

You may not qualify if:

  • Pre-existing ocular irritation that would preclude contact lens fitting
  • Currently enrolled in an ophthalmic clinical trial
  • Evidence of systemic or ocular abnormality, infection or disease which is likely to affect successful wear of contact lenses or use of the accessory solutions, as determined by the investigator
  • Any use of medications for which contact lens wear could be contradicted, as determined by the investigator
  • Current extended-wear users (sleep-in overnight)
  • Current monovision lens wearers
  • Current wearers of multifocal contact lenses
  • Current wearers of toric contact lenses (front surface design)
  • Current wearers of astigmatic contact lenses (posterior surface design)
  • Has a reported "Strong" comfort or vision preference between each eye with their habitual RGP lenses
  • Unacceptable fit of habitual lenses
  • Pregnant women and nursing mothers
  • Best-corrected visual acuity worse than 6/9 (LogMAR: +0.20; Snellen decimal: 0.63)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Siehste

Kassel, Germany

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Refractive Errors

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Eye Diseases

Study Officials

  • Andreas Hartwig, PhD, FAAO

    Hartwig Research Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 22, 2015

First Posted

September 17, 2015

Study Start

July 1, 2015

Primary Completion

February 1, 2017

Study Completion

February 16, 2017

Last Updated

August 12, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-08

Locations