Evaluation of Investigational (Frequent Replacement) FRP Lens for Daily Wear
Evaluation of the CooperVision, Inc. Sapphire and Pearl Silicone Hydrogel Daily Wear Contact Lenses When Used for Frequent Replacement for Up to One (1) Month of Daily Wear.
1 other identifier
interventional
89
1 country
6
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to compare the investigational contact lens to a marketed contact lens. The study results were not used for design validation of investigational contact lens,
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 2, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 13, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 24, 2020
CompletedOctober 14, 2020
December 1, 2015
4 months
February 2, 2015
September 3, 2020
September 24, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (16)
Slit Lamp Findings for Epithelial Edema
Slit Lamp Findings for Epithelial Edema on a grade of 0-4 (0 NONE: No microcysts; normal transparency, 1 TRACE: 1 to 20 microcysts; barely discernible local epithelial haziness, 2 MILD: 21 to 50 microcysts; faint but definite localized or generalized haziness, 3 MODERATE: 51 to 100 microcysts; significant localized or generalized haziness, 4 SEVERE: \>100 microcysts; definite widespread epithelial cloudiness giving a dull glass appearance to the cornea, or numerous coalescing bullae)
Baseline (After lens dispensing)
Slit Lamp Findings for Epithelial Edema
Slit Lamp Findings for Epithelial Edema on a grade of 0-4 (0 NONE: No microcysts; normal transparency, 1 TRACE: 1 to 20 microcysts; barely discernible local epithelial haziness, 2 MILD: 21 to 50 microcysts; faint but definite localized or generalized haziness, 3 MODERATE: 51 to 100 microcysts; significant localized or generalized haziness, 4 SEVERE: \>100 microcysts; definite widespread epithelial cloudiness giving a dull glass appearance to the cornea, or numerous coalescing bullae)
1 Month
Slit Lamp Findings for Stromal Edema
Slit Lamp Findings for Stromal Edema on a grade of 0-4 (0 NONE: No edema, 1 TRACE: Just detectable clouding, 2 MILD: Faint corneal striae (2 or fewer), 3 MODERATE: Pronounced corneal striae (3), 4 SEVERE: Folds in Descemet's membrane and \>4 pronounced striae)
Baseline (After lens dispensing)
Slit Lamp Findings for Stromal Edema
Slit Lamp Findings for Stromal Edema on a grade of 0-4 (0 NONE: No edema, 1 TRACE: Just detectable clouding, 2 MILD: Faint corneal striae (2 or fewer), 3 MODERATE: Pronounced corneal striae (3), 4 SEVERE: Folds in Descemet's membrane and \>4 pronounced striae)
1 month
Slit Lamp Findings for Corneal Infiltrates
Slit Lamp Findings for Corneal Infiltrates - Present, Absent
Baseline (After lens dispensing)
Slit Lamp Findings for Corneal Infiltrates
Slit Lamp Findings for Corneal Infiltrates - Present, Absent
1 Month
Slit Lamp Findings for Corneal Vascularization
Slit Lamp Findings for Corneal Vascularization on a grade 0-4 (0 NONE: No vessel penetration, 1 TRACE: \<1.00 mm vessel penetration, 2 MILD: \>1.00 mm to \<1.50 mm vessel penetration, 3 MODERATE: \>1.50 mm to \<2.00 mm vessel penetration, 4 SEVERE: Vessel penetration \>2.00 mm)
Baseline (After lens dispensing)
Slit Lamp Findings for Corneal Vascularization
Slit Lamp Findings for Corneal Vascularization on a grade 0-4 (0 NONE: No vessel penetration, 1 TRACE: \<1.00 mm vessel penetration, 2 MILD: \>1.00 mm to \<1.50 mm vessel penetration, 3 MODERATE: \>1.50 mm to \<2.00 mm vessel penetration, 4 SEVERE: Vessel penetration \>2.00 mm)
1 month
Slit Lamp Findings for Limbal Hyperemia
Slit Lamp Findings for Limbal Hyperemia on a grade 0-4 (0 NONE: No hyperemia present, 1 TRACE: Slight regional hyperemia, 2 MILD: Diffuse hyperemia, 3 MODERATE: Marked regional or diffuse hyperemia, 4 SEVERE: Diffuse episcleral or scleral hyperemia)
Baseline (After lens dispensing)
Slit Lamp Findings for Limbal Hyperemia
Slit Lamp Findings for Limbal Hyperemia on a grade 0-4 (0 NONE: No hyperemia present, 1 TRACE: Slight regional hyperemia, 2 MILD: Diffuse hyperemia, 3 MODERATE: Marked regional or diffuse hyperemia, 4 SEVERE: Diffuse episcleral or scleral hyperemia)
1 month
Slit Lamp Findings for Bulbar Hyperemia
Slit Lamp Findings for Bulbar Hyperemia on a grade 0-4 (0 NONE: No hyperemia present, 1 TRACE: Slight regional hyperemia, 2 MILD: Diffuse hyperemia, 3 MODERATE: Marked regional or diffuse hyperemia, 4 SEVERE: Diffuse episcleral or scleral hyperemia)
Baseline (After lens dispensing)
Slit Lamp Findings for Bulbar Hyperemia
Slit Lamp Findings for Bulbar Hyperemia on a grade 0-4 (0 NONE: No hyperemia present, 1 TRACE: Slight regional hyperemia, 2 MILD: Diffuse hyperemia, 3 MODERATE: Marked regional or diffuse hyperemia, 4 SEVERE: Diffuse episcleral or scleral hyperemia)
1 month
Slit Lamp Findings for Palpebral Conjunctiva
Slit Lamp Findings for Palpebral Conjunctiva - Present, Absent
Baseline (After lens dispensing)
Slit Lamp Findings for Palpebral Conjunctiva
Slit Lamp Findings for Palpebral Conjunctiva - Present, Absent
1 month
Slit Lamp Findings for Other Findings
Slit Lamp Findings for Other findings (conjunctival infection, corneal ulcers, iritis, lens adhesions and recurrent erosion) on a grade 0-4 (0 NONE, 1 TRACE, 2 MILD, 3 MODERATE, 4 SEVERE)
Baseline (After lens dispensing)
Slit Lamp Findings for Other Findings
Slit Lamp Findings for Other findings (conjunctival infection, corneal ulcers, iritis, lens adhesions and recurrent erosion) on a grade 0-4 (0 NONE, 1 TRACE, 2 MILD, 3 MODERATE, 4 SEVERE)
1 month
Study Arms (2)
Sapphire
EXPERIMENTALSubjects randomized to the experimental contact lens over the study duration
Pearl
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects randomized to the active comparator contact lens over the study duration
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Prior to being considered eligible to participate in this study, each subject MUST:
- Be at least 18 years of age as of the date of evaluation for the study.
- Have:
- Read the Informed Consent
- been given an explanation of the Informed Consent
- indicated understanding of the Informed Consent
- signed the Informed Consent document.
- Be willing and able to adhere to the instructions set forth in this protocol and able to keep all specified appointments.
- Be an adapted, current full-time silicone hydrogel or soft contact lens wearer. An adapted full-time wearer is defined as wearing contact lenses at least 5 days per week for at least 8 hours per day for at least one month prior to participation in the study.
- Possess or obtain prior to dispensing, wearable and visually functional (20/40 or better) eyeglasses.
- Be in good general health, based on his/her knowledge.
- Require spectacle lens powers between -0.50 and -8.00 diopters sphere with no more than 1.50 diopter of refractive astigmatism and be willing to wear contact lenses in both eyes.
- Have manifest refraction Snellen visual acuities (VA) equal to or better than 20/25 in each eye.
- To be eligible for lens dispensing, the subject must achieve 20/30 VA or better in each eye with the study lens and the investigator must judge the fit as acceptable or optimal.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects may not be enrolled in this study if any of the following apply: The subject is currently or has:
- Wearing lenses in a monovision modality and is unwilling to be fit with distance lenses in both eyes for the duration of the study. NOTE: Subjects may not wear lenses in a monovision modality at any time during the study as it will interfere with the visual acuity analysis.
- Poor personal hygiene.
- Any active participation in another clinical trial during this trial or within 30 days prior to this study.
- To the best of the subject's knowledge, she is currently pregnant, is lactating or is planning a pregnancy within the next 3 months.
- A member, relative or household member of the investigator or of the investigational office staff.
- Has a known sensitivity to the ingredients used in the MPS approved for use in the study and is unable or unwilling to use the alternate care system.
- Previous refractive surgery; or current or previous orthokeratology treatment.
- Is aphakic or psuedophakic.
- Ocular or systemic disease such as, but not limited to: anterior uveitis or iritis (past or present), glaucoma, Sjögren's syndrome, lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, keratoconus or uncontrolled diabetes.
- The need for topical ocular medications or any systemic medication which might interfere with contact lens wear or require the lenses to be removed during the day.
- The presence of clinically significant (grade 2, 3 or 4) anterior segment abnormalities; or the presence of any inflammations such as iritis; or any infection of the eye, lids, or associated structures.
- A known history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity), corneal ulcer, corneal infiltrates, iritis, bacterial or fungal infections.
- A history of papillary conjunctivitis that has interfered with contact lens wear.
- Slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear, including but not limited to:
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
Eric M White OD, Inc.
San Diego, California, 92123, United States
Office of Mark E Nakano, O.D.
Torrance, California, 90503, United States
Advanced Family Eye Care
Denver, North Carolina, 28037, United States
Quinn Foster & Associates
Athens, Ohio, 45701, United States
Primary Eyecare Group, P.C.
Brentwood, Tennessee, 37027, United States
Premier Vision Services, LLC
Amarillo, Texas, 79119, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Myhanh Nguyen
- Organization
- CooperVision, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Steven L Saltzman, MD, FACOG
Sterling IRB
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 2, 2015
First Posted
February 13, 2015
Study Start
February 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
October 14, 2020
Results First Posted
September 24, 2020
Record last verified: 2015-12